Seizure

The Supreme Court has ruled that any items other than weapons seized are violation of the person’s fourth amendment rights. Finally, the law enforcement authorities can perform search and seizure activities from a suspicious person only if they think that person is carrying illegal weapons for some criminal intentions. Q4. Describe a case where evidence was not accepted in the court due to violation of Fourth Amendment. Due to the suspicious…

eight amendments. These rights mentioned have evolved because of other cases that have affected the criminal justice system. The freedom from unreasonable search and seizures is protected by The Fourth Amendment. The people are protected, and secure in their persons, homes, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizures are not to be violated. Unless there is probable cause, no warrants shall be issued,…

Frisk The practice of stop and frisk first began with Terry vs. Ohio. The Fourth Amendment had long required that uniformed officers have probable cause in order to conduct Fourth Amendment invasions in order to administer a reasonable search and seizure. In 1968 the Warren Court, despite its liberal reputation lowered the standards that police officers had to meet. In order to conduct a certain type of search this is now known as “stop’ and ‘frisk. A "stop and frisk" occurs when a uniformed or…

Parental Thoughts and Actions Regarding Their Child’s First Febrile Seizure Febrile seizures (FS) are a common convulsive disorder triggered by a fever during early childhood between the ages of 6 months and 5 years. They have no important negative effects on the patients cognitive development and usually represent a benign condition which does not require an extensive workup. To medical professionals, FS are just an everyday, harmless phenomenon with good prognosis, but to the inexperienced…

uncontrolled seizure disorder on Monday, February 22, 2016. She continues to report it was a mild seizure and there wasn’t any need to call EMS. Client reported she used to go to Bread & Life for community support but she doesn’t go anymore because it always crowded. EDUCATION: Client continues…

The Fourth Amendment Do you know you have the right to say NO?. The Fourth Amendment in other words Search and Seizures allows one to say no until proper legal document or warrant is shown to search or seized someone’s home, car, personal item and to protect people rights to privacy from the government intrusions. Meaning the government can’t use police force in which would expose citizens. Also the Fourth Amendment respects people rights and that it should not be violated. The…

maintained that the search performed on Dickerson was far more invasive than what is applicable under the Fourth Amendment. Furthermore, the courts stated that by allowing the “plain touch” exception, there have been numerous unlawful searches and seizures conducted. Officers can confiscate contraband, and it can be used against the perpetrator; yet, it must be within the same boundaries that are set in place by Terry vs.…

the stop and frisk laws are the reason. I personally do not believe that stop and frisk laws are Constitutional. It is very difficult for me to justify how this is legal under the fourth amendment rights against illegal search, and seizure. The rights apply to the seizure as it relates to the stop or detaining of a person. Any time a person is stopped by a police officer and is not permitted to leave is considered an arrest.…

the officers at the port was border search exception which is a Unites States criminal law that usually allows all kinds of searches and seizures at the US international borders and all their functional warrant actually without a warrant or even probable case. How would the Customs Officer describe what was found in her reports to articulate her search and seizure? After asking Mr. Noris a few questions on where he was going and what he was upto, I realized that he really fidgeting and…

However, the court in Long had ruled that if police lacked probable cause in believing that the object in plain view was contraband then conducting a further search to make the object apparent would make the plain view doctrine unwarranted with the seizure of the contraband. The Minnesota Supreme Court, thus, rejected the plain view doctrine because, first, the sense of touch was inherently unreliable compared to the sense of sight. secondly, the sense of touch was more intrusive and, thus,…