What Are The Arguments Against Stop And Frisk Laws

Improved Essays
Stop and frisk is truly an complicated development in the world of criminal justice. It allows for officers to stop people based solely off how they look, or act socially; and search them in New York city. While new york has shown a extravagant decrease in crime as of late, there is no concrete evidence that states that the stop and frisk laws are the reason. I personally do not believe that stop and frisk laws are Constitutional. It is very difficult for me to justify how this is legal under the fourth amendment rights against illegal search, and seizure. The rights apply to the seizure as it relates to the stop or detaining of a person. Any time a person is stopped by a police officer and is not permitted to leave is considered an arrest.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    3rd Circuit Case Summary

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court ruling. A Fourth Amendment seizure requires restraint of a person’s freedom of movement by physical force or show of authority. The seizure of a police officer depends on whether the order is issued in the police department’s capacity as an employer, or in its role as the law enforcement arm of the state. The Third Circuit recognized whether a police officer would reasonably have perceived his superior officer to be issuing orders as his supervisor or as a law enforcement agent will not always be clear.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hourlong Debate Summary

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the article “Excerpts from the Hourlong Debate of the Democratic Candidates for Mayor” Green mention racial profiling it is illegal under the federal law and the most ideal approach to do stop and frisk is by making rules when a police officer question a person in public place. On the other hand, Hevesi argue that during in 1994 to 1995 police disregard those rules and they were permitted to profile. Also he mention that people were stop and frisk despite the fact there is no crime and connection with the victims. Vallone argue that he is not going to suspend stop and frisk, but only can be done when the officers have probable cause or reasonable suspicious of a person who commit a crime, is committing or is about to commit a crime. Likewise…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reason for saying this is because it is simply racist the fact that most stops conducted have been and should be on black and/or Hispanic people. I find it great that law enforcement officials conduct stops on people that seem suspicious, but not just focus on black and Hispanic people and especially those that are not suspicious of anything. I believe that instead of decreasing crime in New York City the only thing that this policy has been doing and will continue doing is creating anger and more crime. Moreover, there are no difference in the formulas, because the intention to still stop black and Hispanic people is still happening and it should not be this way, but sadly it is. All in all, every person regardless of their race should be stop if found…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the New York Civil Liberties Union, studies have shown that the stop and frisk do not actually reduce crime rates. In most of the stops done because of the officers’ beliefs that there is weapon involvement, nothing is usually found, which means that no arrest is made. This means that a lot of the stops done, are done to innocent people. In the New York Civil Liberties Union article, “Stop and Frisk Data”, it even states, “Nearly nine of 10 stopped-and-frisked New Yorkers have been completely innocent.”…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NYPD implementation of its Stop, Question, and Frisk program under Mayor Bloomberg and the NYPD Commissioner Kelly has been a heavy controversial subject for decades (Garrison, 2014). Stop-and-Frisk has also been a contentious law enforcement practice since it was first approved by the Supreme Court (Rudovsky and Rosenthal, 2013). Terry Vs. Ohio established the Stop-and-Frisk act in 1968, concluding that the law enforcement had the right to stop citizens under reasonable suspicion that they have committed, committing or going to commit a crime. It was also concluded that if the law enforcement suspected citizens to be armed and/or dangerous, they could conduct a “frisk” or a pat down to citizens outer clothing in search for weapons.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stop and frisk searches sometimes are unsuccessful in catching potential criminals. However, proponents of the stop and frisk program believe it’s a successful crime deterrent. The practice of stop and frisk has sparked a large amount of controversy amongst the police and the general public. The NYPD should not be able to proceed any further with the practice of stop and frisk. The program directly violates the people’s Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Essay

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop-and-Frisk Policy Review According to the Washington Post article “Here’s what you need to know about stop and frisk — and why the courts shut it down” by Dylan Matthews, Stop and Frisk is “an NYPD policy wherein police will detain and question pedestrians, and potentially search them, if they have a reasonable suspicion that the pedestrian in question committed, is committing, or is about to commit a felony or a Penal Law misdemeanor” (Matthews). This means that if a person appears suspicious of having commit or being about to commit a crime according to a police officer then that police officer has the right to question, search and detain this particular individual. This seems like something that would benefit society, preventing crime and ridding society of wrongdoers. However, there are serious issues with this policy.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three, consent; a person can give an officer to have authority to search or seizure. Four, Stop and Frisk: An officer can stop a suspect as long as there is a reasonable suspicion. Five, Automobile exception: a warrant is not required to search vehicles, if there is probable cause. The automobile exception, does allow the search of a boat to be searched. (National Paralegal College,…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is just a form of racial profiling because over half the percent of people they stop are African Americans. We are suspected to have some form of a weapon on contraband, or us and if it just happened that someone they stopped and frisked did they would get charged. In these cases whites never seem to cause suspicious among cops. It is easier for police to just be able to go into urban areas and criminalize the people there because it is cheaper for their police force than to go into suburban areas where there can be drugs or contraband inside of there houses and having to look into many of the crimes police would need a search warrant because the crimes in these areas are typically done behind closed doors. Because we look suspicious to a specific police officer they take this as an advantage and use this as a style of policing it gives them to right to just stop and search me as If I was a criminal.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment, must primarily demonstrate an expectation of solitude, which is not simply a subjective expectation in attitude; however, an expectation that civilization is prepared to distinguish as realistic under the circumstances. For example, warrantless searches of personally own properties are customarily prohibited without admissible concessions; in contrast, a warrantless confiscation of derelict property typically does not violate the Fourth Amendment. (Legal Information Institution, n.d.) Seizures Seizures transpire when law enforcement physically apprehends a citizen; this frequently occurs during an arrest, though, it can likewise ensue in the course of stopping a pedestrian, a traffic stop or in other situations.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Canady 1 Keyaira Canady Ms. Purdie English II 31 March 2015 What is racial profiling unfair? Racial Profiling is an unfair practice that is not necessary in crime prevention. Racial profiling is the act of targeting a person for criminal investigation primarily because of racial or ethnic characteristics. It impacts our society because people now don’t really trust law enforcement because of certain cases were some law enforcement were using racial profiling to solve a case.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crime in the United States has been very bad in the last couple decades, though in the more recent years’ crime has been steadily decreasing. The police have been implementing a way of reducing crime by using the method of stop and frisk mostly in cities such as New York City or Chicago which are more prominently used. Stop and frisk is when a police officer has reasonable suspicion that a crime is going to happen, about to happen, or has happened before stopping a suspect. The officer then goes on to do a quick pat down to see if they have anything suspicious on them. There are different points of view of whether or not the act of stop and frisk should be legal or not.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Racial Profiling Argument

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Racial Profiling goes against this right and should be banned, or have harsher punishments when is displayed. Furthermore, cops are taking it upon themselves to kill many innocent people, there needs to be a better way to protect themselves without having to resort into taking someone’s life. As John F. Kennedy states “The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human lives…” (Kennedy pg1. 1961).…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays