Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest judicial body in the United States, and leads the federal judiciary. It consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight Associate Justices, all of which are nominated by the President and confirmed with the "advice and consent" of the Senate. The Court meets in Washington, D.C. in the United States Supreme Court building. The Supreme Court is primarily an appellate court, but it has original jurisdiction over a small range of cases. The 17th and current Chief Justice of the United States is John Roberts Jr. He took his seat on September 29, 2005, having been nominated by President George W. Bush after the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist. He has been described as…

#1 The Supreme Court is an appellate court and the highest court in the United States (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 41). The jurisdiction or legal ability for the Supreme Court to hear a case is established by Article III, Section II of the Constitution of the United States of America (“About,” n.d.). As established by the Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) and appellate jurisdiction which means, it can hear appeals from the highest state courts…

he Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court within the hierarchy of the country’s federal courts. The Court was established in accordance to Article III of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court consists of nine total members, all of whom are nominated by the President at the time, and approved by the Senate. All nine members of the Supreme Court serve their term for life, only leaving when they retire, resign, or are impeached. In theory, the Supreme Court is meant to…

3rd + Possible 4th Paragraph: Supreme Court Rulings The have been plenty of public cases through history about free speech, and what constituted as free speech. There have been some that ended in the protection of the certain act, and some of the cases resulted in the act becoming illegal. One of the most notable cases of an act becoming illegal is Schenck v. United States, which took place in 1919. In Schenck's case, it was found that he was mailing letters that was obstructing recruitment for…

United States vs. Robert F McDonnell and use pills Maureen McDonnell case number 15 – 474 the Supreme Court McDowell petitioned the official Act of the conspiracy charges and conviction did not provide Pacific evidence. In 2014 Robert McDonnell, because the 71 Governor of Virginia throughout the term in office became partners with Jonnie Williams, a wealthy businessman. Williams offered favors to influence McDonnell supports with the dietary corporation at the Star Scientific Inc. Robert…

2015). The standard for competency was set by the supreme court case Dusky v United States. Dusky v. United States was a supreme court case in which the defendant, Dusky, challenged the ruling in his original case that he was competent to stand trial despite an expert testifying he was not competent. The court overturned his conviction stating that the "record in this case does not sufficiently support the findings of competency to stand trial". The court then ordered a new evaluation, as well…

Microsoft v. United states December 2013, the agents of the federal law enforcement told the United States District Court that the warrant requiring Microsoft to disclose all e-mails and other information associated with the account of one of its customers. The people that need them because they had received reports and beliefs that the account was being used for drug trafficking and that they need the emails for proof. Magistrate Judge then issued the requested warrant. The United states in the…

his is the Supreme Court opinion in the case which involves the case of United States v. Fields. A man named, Abel Fields. who is a resident of California, is being tried for the Stolen Valor Act. In 2011. Abel Fields spoke publicly at a meeting he attend. During his speech, he claimed that he had served in the military for eight years. Along with that false information, fields also says during his time he received a Purple Heart. Everything fields said was false. He did not serve in the…

Marbury v. Madison was a benchmark United States Supreme court case in which the court formed the foundation for the exercise of Judicial review under Article 3 of the US constitution. The landmark decision of this case, defined the boundaries between the Executive and Judicial branches of the US government. Case Summary The case started with the petition filed to the supreme Court on February 11, 1803 by William Marbury. William Marbury had been appointed justice of Peace in the district of…

of the court seizing it at that time was a legal obligation. Moreover, this type of seize is justifiable under the plain view doctrine and does not violate the rights given to the accused under the Fourth Amendment. Hendrix (2013) explains that “in Harris v. United States (1968), the Supreme Court established that anything a police officer sees in plain view, when the officer has a right to be where he or she is, is not the product of a search and is therefore admissible as evidence” (p.159).…