The Role Of The Supreme Court In The United States

Improved Essays
#1 The Supreme Court is an appellate court and the highest court in the United States (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 41). The jurisdiction or legal ability for the Supreme Court to hear a case is established by Article III, Section II of the Constitution of the United States of America (“About,” n.d.). As established by the Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) and appellate jurisdiction which means, it can hear appeals from the highest state courts (sometimes called state supreme courts), special federal courts, federal appeals courts, and when circumstances permit federal district courts (“About,” n.d & Cheeseman, 2013, p. 44). The Certiorari Act of 1925 allows the Supreme to decided, with a few exemptions, whether or not to it will hear a case (“About,” n.d.). The Supreme Court only hears about hundred cases out of thousands each year, therefore, writs of certiorari (an official notice that the Supreme Court will review a case) are mostly issued to cases involving constitutional and important issues (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 45). The Supreme Court does not hear any new testimony or evidence. Records from lower courts are reviewed, and if it is determined there was an error, the Supreme Court will reverse or modify the previous court’s decision. …show more content…
44) Since the Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, all decisions are final (Cheeseman, 2013, 44) When decisions are unanimous or a majority then a precedent is set for future

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Glossip Vs Midazolam

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the Supreme Court acts as both moral and legal arbiter of the nation. Supreme Court decisions all have the potential to have a tremendous impact on the lives of Americans. Some decisions have transformed American society. On April 29, 2015, the Supreme Court Case of Glossip v. Gross was argued.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial powers are stated in the Constitution and we labeled the Supreme Court, and those courts that are below the highest in the land, congress has the obligation to establish these courts. Distribution of power allows the Supreme Court to have the final say-so in cases involving: ambassadors, other public ministers and counsels. During any other cases the Supreme Court should have the power of court review and the ability to change the outcomes of the lower courts final deacons. Thus the question that will arise is that, if an act is untasteful in the Constitutions terms can the law become the law of the country, this should be an interesting topic for elected officials.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court established its power of judicial review over the other branches of the federal government in one of the most famous cases in our history. This case, Marbury v. Madison, was decided in 1803. The Constitution clearly limits the cases that can go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court without being first heard in a lower court. Marbury's case did not fit within these limits. Congress had changed the Constitution when it passed that part of the Judiciary Act.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to these facts the U.S. Supreme Court has the ability to exercise judicial review of legislative acts and declare them…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Everything can change at any moment, suddenly and forever” (“Paul”). American author Paul Auster expressed the famous idea of one moment shaping everything else in the future. On February 24, 1803, one mere Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison, changed the course of American history. From this ruling, the Supreme Court gained judicial review: the authority to give their opinions on the constitutionality of laws. This positively impacted America because it prohibited the government from abusing the Constitution.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    he Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court within the hierarchy of the country’s federal courts. The Court was established in accordance to Article III of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court consists of nine total members, all of whom are nominated by the President at the time, and approved by the Senate. All nine members of the Supreme Court serve their term for life, only leaving when they retire, resign, or are impeached.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue.” John Adams, who served as the second President of the United States and was a remarkable political philosopher, penned these words. Remarkably, John Adam’s words ring true today. However, morality is the issue and one point is sure: The United States Supreme Court should not arbitrate morality.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When justices on the bench of the United States Supreme Court make their respective decisions on a case, they are faced with two outcomes. The first is that they can decide to overturn a decision from a lower court, deem a federal law unconstitutional, or nullify other federal or state statute. When the Supreme Court changes previous statute or overturns a previous court decision, it is judicial activism. But when the Supreme Court decides to uphold precedent, upholding laws passed by Congress or state legislatures, or strictly adhering to the original text of the Constitution, it is judicial restraint. Although the aforementioned terms do not have any overlap in their definitions, it can often be seen that both of these judicial practices can be implemented in a single Supreme Court ruling.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1954, the Supreme Court shifts its support of protecting economic rights during the Lochner era, to a commitment to equality liberalism. Brown is a proper use of the Supreme Court’s power. Its four valid shortcomings reveal the support Brown had from other political actors. Brown’s support provides the court legitimacy for their ruling and provided an era for equality. This era of equality allowed the court and social movements to work in synergy.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nominating a Supreme Court Justice is an incredibly important job, it could give your party a majority on the bench. Therefore, Presidents have attempted at nominating justices who agree with them on issues and belong to the same party as them. However, history has proven to be a disappointment for those who nominate Justices based on ideology (Dorsen). Republicans seems to face the most disappointment with two of the current Justices, John G. Roberts and Anthony M. Kennedy moving more to the left since being placed on the bench. However, it was Justice Earl Warren who became to be known as the most disappointing Justice for the Republicans.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Supreme Court will follow precedent — the cases it has previously decided. Even justices who might disagree with a precedent (including those who dissented when the case was originally decided) will almost always feel bound to apply it to later cases. As decisions on a particular issue accumulate, the Court might clarify or modify its doctrines, but the earlier precedents will mark the starting point. History is full of examples of newly elected presidents vowing to change particular precedents of the Supreme Court, but failing despite the appointment of new justices. Stare decisis ensures that doctrinal changes are likely to be gradual rather than abrupt and that well-entrenched decisions are unlikely to be overturned.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the highest court in the United States, the Supreme Court has the lawful authority provided Article III of the U.S. Constitution created the Supreme Court and “authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. In the federal court system’s present form, 94 district level trial courts and 13 courts of appeals sit below the Supreme Court.” This means that regardless of status of status, the Supreme Court has the final decision. The Plethora of Court…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two Supreme Court systems in Texas are the Court of Criminal Appeals and Texas Supreme Court. According to utexas.edu, the Court of Criminal Appeals “is the highest state court for appeals resulting from criminal cases. This court has statewide, final appellate jurisdiction over criminal cases. It also makes rules of post-trial and appellate procedure for criminal cases.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays