Supreme Court Case: Dusky V. United States

Improved Essays
On December 16th, 2010, deputies responded to a reported disturbance in St. Augustine, Florida. A woman had called and reported that she had gotten into an argument with her roommate Lawrence Dean O’Bryan, who she described as intoxicated. The woman told the dispatcher she had locked herself into her room and started receiving text messages from O’Bryan asking her to come out. She then reported that she thought she heard O 'Bryan loading one of his many firearms.
As the deputies attempted to help the woman and her daughter leave the house, O’Bryan walked up near the home’s front door and fired at the three sheriff’s deputies. O 'Bryan was then shot by one of the officers and was taken to the hospital. The deputies and O 'Bryan all
…show more content…
About thirty percent of defendants are found incompetent to stand trial every year (Gay, J. G., Ragatz, L., & Vitacco, M., 2015). The standard for competency was set by the supreme court case Dusky v United States. Dusky v. United States was a supreme court case in which the defendant, Dusky, challenged the ruling in his original case that he was competent to stand trial despite an expert testifying he was not competent. The court overturned his conviction stating that the "record in this case does not sufficiently support the findings of competency to stand trial". The court then ordered a new evaluation, as well as a new trial if Dusky was once again found competent. According to the court, in order to be deemed competent to stand trial, a defendant must understand the charges against them, understand how a court operates, and must be able to aid his or her attorneys (Dusky v. United States 362 U.S. 402, …show more content…
Ultimately, in March 2011, a judge found O’Bryan incompetent to stand trial and ordered him into the custody of the Department of Children and Families until he could be restored to competency (Keever, 2016). What methods were used to try and restore O 'Bryan to competency were not all completely publicized. However, we can speculate on what action was taken. Restoration treatment for the mentally ill usually included antipsychotic medication. This medication is only given unwillingly in cases where the patient is considered dangerous (Mueller, C., & Wylie, A. M., 2007). This was initially ruled in the case Sell v. United States. The court ruled that medication should only be given if, the medical professionals believe that the patient will not improve without them and that the medication will not have significant side effects that will interfere with the defendant 's ability to have a fair trial (Sell v. United States 539 U.S. 166, 2003). The defendant in this case, O 'Bryan, was said to have been cooperative with treatment and his attorney has said that he has willingly taken his medication (Keever, 2016). People who are initially found incompetent to stand trial are often found to be incompetent in future rulings (Gay, J. G., Ragatz, L., & Vitacco, M., 2015). The defendant in this case was not an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the judgement of Mason CJ and McHugh J, it was said that a “ trial judge who is faced with an application for an adjournment or a stay by an indigent accused charged with a serious offence [...] the trial in such a case should be adjourned, postponed or stayed until legal representation is available. The judgement also stated that “an accused has the right to a fair trial and that, depending on all the circumstances of the particular case, lack of representation may mean that an accused is unable to receive, or did not receive, a fair trial. “ Moreover, the judgement of Deane and Gaudron suggested that the right to receive counsel was found in the Constitution, specifically Chapter Three which requires that ‘judicial process and fairness be observed.’ However, both Justice Brennan and Justice Dawson dissented, stating that it would unjust for judges to adjourn or stay trial due to the pressures it would place on legal aid agencies. For Dietrich, the outcome of the High Court case meant that without the legal representation he had required for the trial and due to the trial judge’s failure to grant an adjournment, a miscarriage of justice had occurred.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the court case Garrity Vs New Jersey the officer on trial was made to incriminate himself by being forced to testify. This officer was later convicted on his testimony. The supreme court hailed that the officers answers could not be used against him in his criminal trial because the fifth amendment forbid a coerced confession. Today the Garrity rule states if an officer is compelled to provide self incriminating statements information or statements such statements can not be used in a criminal proceeding, but officers can be disciplined or discharged.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At approximately 12:49am, I was in the Platteville Police Department’s dispatch room. A call came in at that time from Ms. Courtney L. Marks (W/F, DOB: 05-30-89). Ms. Marks reported that she had heard two loud bangs which she believed to be gun shots. Ms. Marks was calling from Southwest Hall, room 212, where she resides.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel,” the defendant is appealing his sentence of 111 years and eight months. The defendant was charged and pled guilty to four counts of murder and twenty-six attempted counts of murder, in 1998. During the sentence hearing, the defendant claimed that his actions were caused by a mental disease, and that this…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Boo Muxley Diary

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On 02/23/17 at approximately 0046 hours, Deputy Oxley and I responded to the Dolores Public Library located at 1002 Railroad Ave. in the Town of Dolores in Montezuma County, Colorado. We met with a female identified as Mattingly, Virginia DOB: 03/01/70 who wanted to report a Domestic Violence between her and her boyfriend. Upon arrival, Mattingly, Virginia told Deputy Oxley her and her boyfriend, identified as Mares, Gabriel DOB: 07/25/89, had an argument and it got physical (see Deputy Oxley’s narrative for further information). I had Mattingly, Virginia fill out paperwork while we waited for EMS and the Victim’s Assistant.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “On 02/28/2016 at 11:12 am, the victim was outside playing on a trampoline when the suspect shot him in the right leg. The suspect was interviewed by Det. Johnakin, and he confessed he was showing the gun towards the victim when he accidentally pulled the trigger and fired the weapon. The suspect stated he had found the firearm behind a trash can in the Merrifield’s neighborhood. Officers on scene recovered the firearm in the next yard over, and the suspect stated he had thrown the gun along with the shell casing into that yard.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Southern Manifesto was created as a response to the decision of the Oliver Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka case. The Southern Manifesto is also referred to as the Declaration of Constitutional Principles. Brown v. Board, essentially ordered the end of segregation is schools. It overturned the prior Supreme Court decision of Homer A. Plessy v. John H. Ferguson. That case had decided that racial segregation was legal as long as it was relatively equal and did not imply "any inferiority of blacks," (Plessy v. Ferguson).…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Courtroom participants most have professional standards when serving the public. In Kenneth Olsen’s case the prosecution withheld information. In Brian Adcok case there was ineffective assistance of his counsel. In Judge Amanda F. Williams her court room was not properly ran. Because of theses misconduct, two defendants in these cases were able to appeal their court’s decision.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medications are the most commonly used form of treatment offered to restore a defendant’s competence (). Although due to the decision in, Sell v United States (2003), the court must also find that alternative and less invasive techniques, with the potential to achieve the same results, are not available. However, as Danielle also mentioned, many jurisdictions have established psychoeducational programs to increase the defendants understanding of the legal process. In my opinion, I would recommend antipsychotics to be used prior to standing trial for individuals who are suffering from a severely debilitating mental disorder that was causing significant impairment. On the other hand, I would not recommend antipsychotics to individuals suffering…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, Judge Awotwi, presided over the mock trial State Prosecution vs. Macbeth, and it is my duty to uphold the rule of law and instruct true justice upon this issue. The defendant entered a plea of insanity due to delusional compulsion before this court on October 24, 2017, after committing beyond a doubt one count of murder and two counts of felony murder. The question is not whether Macbeth committed these crimes, or if he is judged to be found guilty; it is to judge if the defendant “did not have [the] mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong”, and that is the responsibility of the court (16-3-2). Due to the facts presented in court I have come to a verdict. The defense’s unique argument and main points overwhelmed the predominant…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1960, Dusky v. United States ruled that the test must decide whether the defendant has sufficient present ability to consult with his attorney with a reasonable degree of rational understanding, and whether he has a rational, as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him. To fully understand this ruling, it is necessary to break down the true meaning. Present ability refers to their mental capacity at the time of the trial; this is important because the defendant’s mental capacity may be different from the time of the offense to the time of the trial. The ability to consult with one’s attorney does not refer to his or her willingness to assist their attorney, rather it refers to whether he or she is capable in doing so.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President John Adams appointed William Marbury an office and his commission was to be present by Chief Justice James Madison; however, Madison refused to present the commission. (Ginsbert et al, 2013). Therefore, in 1803 Marbury made an appealed to the Supreme Court to have his commission honored.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case Weems V. US the US Supreme Court decided that though is has not been determined to what means is a punishment cruel and unusual. It was upheld, however; that the definition should not be held only to the”evil” described by the framers of the constitution. On May 3, 1946, a seventeen year old Willie Francis was convicted and was unsuccessfully executed through the means of an electric chair. Six days after the attempted execution, a new warrant of death was issued and so began the major US Supreme Court case known as the one and only Louisiana Ex rel. Francis V. Resweber.…

    • 1760 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays