Ethos is the rhetorical appeal that refers to the author of the document and establishes their credentials and authority. A specific example that illustrates the effective use of ethos occurs after the defense argued that a life sentence is unconstitutional under Article I, section 15 of the Oregon constitution. Haselton responds to this claim using ethos stating that “Article I, section 15, of the Oregon Constitution provides a basis for challenging the constitutionality of “[l]aws for the punishment of crime,” not for challenging the length of a particular individual’s sentences” (para. 19). By referencing Article I, section 15 of the Oregon constitution, Haselton demonstrates his credibility and knowledge of the legal system. By doing so, Haselton showcases the audience his authority to deny the defenses’ appeal.
Ethos is the rhetorical appeal that refers to the author of the document and establishes their credentials and authority. A specific example that illustrates the effective use of ethos occurs after the defense argued that a life sentence is unconstitutional under Article I, section 15 of the Oregon constitution. Haselton responds to this claim using ethos stating that “Article I, section 15, of the Oregon Constitution provides a basis for challenging the constitutionality of “[l]aws for the punishment of crime,” not for challenging the length of a particular individual’s sentences” (para. 19). By referencing Article I, section 15 of the Oregon constitution, Haselton demonstrates his credibility and knowledge of the legal system. By doing so, Haselton showcases the audience his authority to deny the defenses’ appeal.