Supreme Court Case: Garrity Vs. New Jersey

Decent Essays
In the court case Garrity Vs New Jersey the officer on trial was made to incriminate himself by being forced to testify. This officer was later convicted on his testimony. The supreme court hailed that the officers answers could not be used against him in his criminal trial because the fifth amendment forbid a coerced confession. Today the Garrity rule states if an officer is compelled to provide self incriminating statements information or statements such statements can not be used in a criminal proceeding, but officers can be disciplined or discharged. When police officers wrongdoing does occur rarity states that the department should make a decision to pursue officers criminally or civilly before interrogation begin. No legal principles

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This case mainly references the Fifth Amendment, the right against self-incrimination. In the case, Malloy, a petitioner, was sentenced to one year in jail for unlawful gambling. After 3 months, however, he was released from jail and put on probation for 2 years. While malloy was on probation, he was asked to testify to a state inquiry into gambling and other criminal-related activities that Malloy was involved in. When he heard this, he declined to testify and answer their questions because it would have incriminated…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Jersey v. T.L.O case is one of the most controversial cases that has passed the supreme court when it comes to our 4th amendment. No unreasonable Searches and Seizures. This very amendment protects our privacy to our things and our lives, leaving it one of our dearest amendments. The New Jersey v. T.L.O. case started in 1984 but ended in 1985. This case started because of an incident in a New Jersey high school.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the Fourteenth Amendment establishes due process and equal protection of the law. The Garrity Rights begin in New Jersey when two law enforcement officers were being investigated. These two officers were given the choice to either incriminate themselves or to loss their jobs under a statute on the grounds of self-incrimination. The confessions of the officers were taken; however, their confession was not voluntary, but coerced as they were under the impression that they would lose their jobs if they did not cooperate with the internal investigation. The purpose of this case study is to determine whether these officers’ Fifth and Fourteenth…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Morgan V Virginia case Irene Morgan, a negro woman got aboard led a motor common carrier from Gloucester County in the state of Virginia headed for Baltimore, Maryland. When she was asked to give up her seat to a white person and move to the back of the bus and a law in Virginia ordered. However, she refused to give away her seat stating that the bus she boarded was an interstate bus and that the Virginia law that demanded she give up her seat did not apply here. Upon refusal to give up her seat, Irene Morgan was arrested and charged, under a state law that imposed the segregation of passengers in public facilities and public transportations based on their race. In 1946, Irene was tried and convicted of being in violation of a Virginia segregation law on interstate buses and, was also fined $10.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The McCulloch v Maryland case, presided over by John Marshall, dealt with the legality of the State of Maryland’s decision to place taxes on bank notes chartered from outside of the area. The issue was brought to the national level after James McCulloch, leader of the Second National Bank of the United States within Baltimore, refused to pay the imposed fee. The Supreme Court ultimately sided in his favor, citing the fact that the state had ratified the Constitution and then, the Necessary and Proper Clause. Likewise, Congress possesses powers that are not specifically defined within the supreme law of the land, therefore it is up to the discretion of the Judicial Branch to decide whether or not the intent is reasonable. In this case, they…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student protestors of Gallaudet University presented the Gallaudet University Board of Trustees with four demands: 1. The resignation of the newly appointed university president Elizabeth Zinser, a hearing person, and the selection of a Deaf person as the universities president. 2. The immediate resignation of Jane Basset Spilman, who was chair of the Board of Trustees. 3.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salinas Vs Texas Summary

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CASE BRIEF Case Name – Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. 12 (2013) Facts – Genovevo Salinas, the petitioner, who was not in custody or read Miranda warnings, agreed to go to the police station to answer questions regarding involvement in a murder. When petitioner was asked if ballistic testing would match ammunition casings found at the scene, he remained silent. Petitioner contended that the prosecutors’ use of his silence to indicate guilt violated his Fifth Amendment rights. Procedural History – The petitioner was charged in Texas state court with murder.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (Alito, Salinas v Texas, 2012) Holding: The Judgment is affirment Rationale/Reason: The reason of this case concerns whether the prosecuting attorney may have used the defendant’s silence throughout pre-arrest , using pre-Miranda questioning as practical evidence of his guilt. Salinas put up a good argument that his Fifth Amendment right were violated by the Supreme Court because they should have over turn his guilty verdict because of the fact the Court of Criminal Appeals and lower Texas courts used evidence of silence throughout pre-arrest, pre-Miranda questioning. (Alito, leranlebertyedu,…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 1) Oregon vs. Smith, is a United States Supreme Court case that determined wither or not the state could reject unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state’s narcotic prohibition, even if the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Legally states have the right to accommodate some illegal acts done in pursuit of religious beliefs, but they are not required to make accommodations. This made The Supreme Court decision a major event in Native American religious beliefs, the case attracted widespread support form not only Native religious beliefs but also voodoo religious beliefs. Oregon v. Smith had a diverse range of religious groups eager to protect their own religious freedom and their use of spiritual medicine.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The struggle between the Native Americans and the Americans was extremely relevant and volatile during the 1800’s. The struggle escalated in 1830 when Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act (“Worcester”). As a result, new issues arose on a fight that had been around for centuries between the Native Americans and the Americans. One major collateral outcome of this act is the Supreme Court case, Worcester vs. Georgia. This case and the results of it turned out to be a major step forward for the Native Americans fighting for their rights and freedom during this time.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most intellectual forces of the Marshall Court was its importance on the Supreme Court's power in Marbury v. Madison. Preceding to the Marshall Court, organizers of the Constitution, For example, Alexander Hamilton inquired the Supreme Court part as the lowest part of the major branch of government. The Marshall Court changed this knowledge in Marbury v. Madison. The case's crucial issue was whether the court had the power to support a constitutional check on the case.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment says that no one can be accused of a crime unless a grand jury decides that there is enough evidence to charge a person for a crime in court. The defendant has a choice to testify or not to testify. If they choose to testify, the defendant loses his Fifth Amendment privilege and must answer the questions asked. However, at the trial the defendant who has been called to the witness stand by the grand jury can refuse to answer certain…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Privacy rights is an issue that dates back to the nineteen hundreds. Even though there is a disagreement where the right of privacy is specifically stated in the constitution, Supreme Court justices have agreed that the right to privacy does exist. One major concern regarding the right to privacy is the issue of consensual adult women having the ability to freely use contraceptives without government intrusion. The use to freely use contraceptives was a major issue from 1873 when the Comstock Law of 1873 originated making it illegal to sell or promote anything that dealt with contraception or abortion etc. This paper will discuss three articles that brings light to the privacy concerns about using contraceptives.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp v. Ohio, after reading the case file this case should not have ever made it to the Supreme Court or any court in the land. This case was doomed from the beginning due to police misconduct that has opened a crack in a door for criminals to slide through. Should the exclusionary rule be abolished? I do believe that court’s ruling regarding Mapp v. Ohio affect the day-to-day police work of our Officers. Peradventure, that the police are serving a legal warrant to pick up robbery suspect who also is a known drug dealer, because of the exclusionary rule from Mapp v. Ohio when the police arrive at the suspect address, they are not allow to search the home looking for drugs unless the warrant stipulates.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays