Morgan Vs. Virginia Case: Morgan V. Irene Morgan

Improved Essays
In the Morgan V Virginia case Irene Morgan, a negro woman got aboard led a motor common carrier from Gloucester County in the state of Virginia headed for Baltimore, Maryland. When she was asked to give up her seat to a white person and move to the back of the bus and a law in Virginia ordered. However, she refused to give away her seat stating that the bus she boarded was an interstate bus and that the Virginia law that demanded she give up her seat did not apply here. Upon refusal to give up her seat, Irene Morgan was arrested and charged, under a state law that imposed the segregation of passengers in public facilities and public transportations based on their race. In 1946, Irene was tried and convicted of being in violation of a Virginia segregation law on interstate buses and, was also fined $10. …show more content…
Courts had ruled against cases like that of Irene’s for a long time so it was not entirely a surprise when the ruling was not in her favor. However, Irene Morgan’s case taken up by lawyer Thurgood Marshall and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and they an appeal on her behalf in the U.S Supreme Court who then heard her case. With the help of her attorneys and the NAACP, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Irene’s case. In 1946, as the court ruled that the Virginia state law that demanded for the segregation of interstate passengers was in conflict with the power that congress possessed to control interstate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I think the most interesting issue in this case Jeremy Jaynes v. Commonwealth of Virginia was that when a man committed crime in one state and created problems in another state, does the circuit court of the state which he caused problems have jurisdiction over him. In favor of Jeremy Jaynes, he just used his computer to send emails in North Carolina, and did not use his computer in Virginia. Also, he argued that he couldn’t control where the email would be sent, so he didn't have intent to cause harms in Virginia. Therefore, Virginia circuit court had no jurisdiction over him. Virginia circuit court argued that since Jeremy Jaynes sent all his emails through the server of AOL and he knew the AOL server is in Virginia.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Briggs v. R.W Elliott - South Carolina: In 1951, in Clarendon County, South Carolina, twenty courageous African-American parents filed a lawsuit against school officials, for their own children received unequal education services compared to the all-white schools. In South Carolina, young African-American children had to walk far distances to attend schools. Some students even had to walk an eight-mile distance to school. They were not allowed to travel on school-provided transportation such as normal school buses!…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This all started when the state of Maryland placed a tax on the banknotes of the second bank in the United States. One of the cashiers ,James McCulloch, of the bank branch appealed to the supreme court. This certain bank happened to be the only bank that was uncharted. Which means there was a heavy tax laid on it. John Marshall declared the vote to the court.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1961, CORE organized the Freedom Rides; African Americans and white activits devided to test the Supreme Court case, Boynton v. Virginia. The group planed to ride from Washington D.C. to New Orleans, Louisiana. The group encountered mass violence when they arrived to Anniston, Alabama. A mob greeted the activits and there were no police protection for them, Commissioner Bull Connor knew they were comming but decided not to send protection to them. When they arrived to Montgomery, Alabama, the police decided to abdandon the riders and let a white mob attack them violently.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of McCulloch v. Maryland was brought to the United States Supreme Court in 1819. The decisions of Chief Justice John Marshall in this case would set precedence for all future cases involving the expansion of federal power and any impediment on federal powers by state governments. The first Bank of the United States (BUS) was created in 1791 as part of Alexander Hamilton's financial plan. It was opposed by Jefferson, who claimed that Congress was not specifically given the right to charter a bank.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Loving v. Virginia cases began when two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter who is a black African American woman and Richard Loving, a white man. They went to the District of Columbia and get married. When they returned to Virginia shortly after their marriage. The State found them guilty and they were charged with violating the state's law does not allow interracial marriages. Richard Loving and his wife were found guilty and even sentenced to a year in…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    States do not have power to tax federal government and in McCulloch v. Maryland case Maryland taxed all branches of banks not chartered by legislature in Maryland. And court denied Maryland's argument according to "supremacy clause" and explained that congress can create bank according to "necessary and proper…

    • 49 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case is significant by that it tests whether people of different races can marry each other. At the time, a white male and a black female getting married was unthinkable and was looked upon with contempt. There were actual state laws that prevented whites from marrying blacks. This case discusses how Virginia's law to segregate blacks and whites from marrying each other was eventually overturned by the superior court because of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protections Clause.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marshall’s ruling on the Marbury v. Madison case was a stroke of political genius. Early in office, Marshall was confronted with an almost impossible political decision. Newly appointed to the Supreme Court, Marshall was asked by Marbury to challenge the Executive branch. Democratic Republican president Jefferson didn’t want Marbury to be appointed Justice of the Peace but Marbury asked the Marshall court to give Vice President Madison a writ of mandamus forcing him to deliver the document legally giving Marbury his desired position. This is a lose-lose situation for Marshall.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Jim Crow Era

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The claim of these laws were the promotion of equality but it was made clear that segregation of African Americans from Caucasians were the basis. These so called equal accommodations were in fact the opposite of equal. Equality was simply not the case and African American passengers sat in unsafe and uncomfortable seating, while their Caucasian counterparts were seated in safe, clean and comfortable spaces. According to Henry Fireside’s article Separate and Unequal: Homer Plessy and the Supreme Court Decision that Legalized Racism, African American passengers were to sit in cars that had drunk and disorderly Caucasian individuals, and were often used for prison transport. Not all African Americans gave into these discriminations, in fact in 1892 a violation of the “Separate Car Act” took…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1890, Louisiana carried out a law that enacted “separate but equal” railway cars for blacks and whites on railroads which was called the Separate Car Act. In 1892, the passenger Homer Plessy, who was one-eighths black and seven-eighths white, sat in a “whites only” car on a Louisiana train. Refusing to move to the black car, he was arrested and jailed for a charge of violating the Separate Car Act. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court. The question was “Is Louisiana’s law authorizing racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional violation on the rights and entitlements and the equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment?”…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of the People vs Smith case, the supreme court of Michigan made an error in a trail of double jeopardy. The defendant Smith was being charged with first-degree murder of a store owner named Richard Cumming and one of the employees Stephen Putman. The victims died of gunshots wounds the store had been robbed. The police discovered the victim's wallets missing and over $2000 in cash from the drops and registers in the store. Smith was convicted of two counts of first-degree felony murder with two counts of larceny armed robbery, and four counts of possession with a firearm.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Equality

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Even though African Americans had many of the same rights as whites, they still struggled with equality. The term “separate but equal” was coined in 1890 in Louisiana’s Separate Car Act. The act explained how on railroads, there would be separate areas for each race and that the areas had to be equal (Laws.com).Plessy v. Ferguson was the first major case since the Civil War to deal with racial inequality. On June 7th, 1892 a one-eighth African-American man, Homer Plessy, sat in what was reserved as a “white-only” car. The scenario was not an accident either.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Among the grievances were exclusion from a hotel dining room; refusal of admission to a New York City opera; segregation to lower-quality seats in a theater; and removal from a train car set aside for white women. All of these indignities were violations of rights enumerated in the 1875 legislation. The Supreme Court analyzed these cases in view of the Fourteenth Amendment and concluded the Amendment was not designed to apply to private citizens or private organizations, but only to the federal and state governments. This decision resulted in the Civil Rights Act of 1875 being invalidated, and opened the doors to blatant discrimination by businesses and individuals. John Marshall Harlan, who was a supporter of civil rights, was the lone voice of dissent on the Court, which ruled 8-1 against the petitioners.…

    • 2708 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A railroad company was incorporated by the laws of Louisiana as a common carrier, and was not authorized to distinguish better between citizens according to race”(Plessy v. Ferguson.” LII / Legal Information Institute, www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/163/537. Paragraph 4). They didn’t have permission to treat others differently by race. “Upon petitioner’s refusal to company with such order, he was, with the aid of a police officer, forcibly ejected from said coach and hurried off to and imprisoned in the parish jail of New Orleans”(Plessy v. Ferguson.”…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays