The claim of these laws were the promotion of equality but it was made clear that segregation of African Americans from Caucasians were the basis. These so called equal accommodations were in fact the opposite of equal. Equality was simply not the case and African American passengers sat in unsafe and uncomfortable seating, while their Caucasian counterparts were seated in safe, clean and comfortable spaces. According to Henry Fireside’s article Separate and Unequal: Homer Plessy and the Supreme Court Decision that Legalized Racism, African American passengers were to sit in cars that had drunk and disorderly Caucasian individuals, and were often used for prison transport. Not all African Americans gave into these discriminations, in fact in 1892 a violation of the “Separate Car Act” took …show more content…
He was found guilty and charged with violating the “Separate Car Act.” According to Stephen Berrey who wrote in his article Resistance Begins at Home: The Black Family and Lessons in Survival and Subversion in Jim Crow Mississippi “The Supreme Court’s 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision cemented the laws dictating separate spaces for blacks and whites” Through this more laws were based from the ruling of the Supreme Court. Plessy was given the option to go to jail for a consecutive time of twenty days or to pay a fine of twenty-five dollars. Plessy chose the