The Supreme Court Case: The John Marshall Case

Improved Essays
President John Adams appointed William Marbury an office and his commission was to be present by Chief Justice James Madison; however, Madison refused to present the commission. (Ginsbert et al, 2013). Therefore, in 1803 Marbury made an appealed to the Supreme Court to have his commission honored. The following President Thomas Jefferson did not believe that the Supreme Court could intervene and that the commission should not be granted. Chief Justice John Marshall had three questions in regards to the appeal (McBride, 2006). Did Marbury have a right to petition the court, did the law of the land have the right to make a decision, and finely did Supreme Court have that right to make the decision (McBride, 2006)? It was decide that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1803 William Marbury sued John Madison for being denied the role of Justice of Peace and claimed that the executive branch was forcing actions on the other branches. Before Thomas Jefferson was elected into his role of Presidency, William Marbury had been appointed to be a Justice of Peace by John Adams, but the appointment process had not fully been completed. By that time Jefferson had been in his role of Presidency and Adam's role was terminated. Thomas Jefferson had then denied Marbury access to his role appointed by the previous President, even though William had been expecting a role. William Marbury brought the case to the Supreme Court, stating that not one branch of the government was allowed to force an action upon another branch.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first question was answered when Marshall claimed that Marbury had a right for the writ of mandamus because he was appointed and followed procedures. The second answer was that the Supreme Court should provide a solution to Marbury’s inconveniences. Marshall also believed that the United States’ courts were at liberty to protect their citizens, no matter the situation. The third answer addressed judicial review because the “Court could not grant the writ because Section 13 of the Judicial Act of 1789… was unconstitutional insofar as it extended cases of original jurisdiction” (McBride). Marbury had rejected this act which inclined the Supreme Court to deny his position.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Marshall wrote the unanimous decision that stated Marbury had the right to sue. The Judiciary act of 1789 was considered unconstitutional4. The Supreme Court cannot mandate something happen. The Writ of Mandamus expanded the power that the court has under the constitution. The judiciary act of 1789 directly conflicted with the U.S Constitution.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most intellectual forces of the Marshall Court was its importance on the Supreme Court's power in Marbury v. Madison. Preceding to the Marshall Court, organizers of the Constitution, For example, Alexander Hamilton inquired the Supreme Court part as the lowest part of the major branch of government. The Marshall Court changed this knowledge in Marbury v. Madison. The case's crucial issue was whether the court had the power to support a constitutional check on the case.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall served as chief judge from 1801 to 1835, and he was the greatest dominance to the Supreme Court that there was no judge can compare. At the outset of his tenure Judge, Supreme Court asserted its power by declaring an Act of Parliament was unconstitutional, that case was Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Marshall's decision in the dilemma seems no escape showed natural talent of his absolute. Marshall declared Section 13 of Act 1789 of Justice is unconstitutional because it empowered instance trial for the Supreme Court beyond the provisions in Article III of the Constitution. Thus, the power of the Supreme Court was reconsidered and decided the congressional legislation was unconstitutional had been set.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second issue is does the United States grant Marbury a remedy? Yes, William Marbury was rightfully commissioned to justice of the peace, but his commission was not sent. Marbury’s rights were violated by law, the United States has to grant Marbury a remedy. Thirdly, does the Supreme Court have the authority to review acts of congress and determine if they are unconstitutional and therefore void? Yes it is the duty of the Supreme Court to determine whether a law or…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The appointments were not finalized before the new Secretary of State James Madison took office, and Madison chose not to honor them. Marbury and the others provoked an Act of Congress and sued to get their appointed positions. They decided to call the law unconstitutional by congress In dred scott vs sanford-n this case dred scott and his wife sued for their freedom in missouri.after living with a army surgeon in the free state of wisconsin. The court decided against dred scott. The conclusion they came too was that slaves were not citizens and were not protected by the…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power in the Court John Marshall was one of the most prominent members of the U.S. Supreme Court. Marshall is known for producing one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history after his ruling in the well-known case of Marbury v. Madison. During the time he served as Chief Justice, Marshall managed to bring more power to the judicial branch. He did so by working his way up to the highest position in the court, strengthening the unity of the justices, and establishing judicial review.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since his secretary would have to appoint to the Justice of Peace, Jefferson told him not to appoint him. The Justice of Peace (Marbury) sued the Secretary of State (Madison). This eventually lead to a law being called unconstitutional, and written off. This was the first time that the supreme court ever did anything of…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The legal principle that Chief Justice John Marshall declared in the Marbury vs. Madison was the principle of judicial review. Judicial review states that the Supreme Court has the right to “judge the constitutionality of federal laws.” As a result, to ensure a method of check and balances in the U.S. legal system, the Supreme Court has the authority to overrule the acts of the executive and legislative branches when their actions are not consistent with the U.S.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marbury then applied to the court for a writ of mandamus. The court then ordered Madison to show why the writ should not be issued. The case proceeded after showing no cause. As the court view the case, they had to consider the following questions and then the decision would be made. The first question was “Has the applicant a right to the commission he demands?”…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a) Read Chapter 9 through the end of the chapter. b) How did the presence of George Washington at the Constitutional Convention give the Convention greater legitimacy? Because he was the leader of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War, George Washington became a highly respected individual following Great Britain’s defeat. As a result of his celebrity, everyone involved in this event agreed to elect him to be chairman, a position which enabled him to serve as a mediator.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thurgood Marshall is arguably one of the most important Supreme Court justices in the history of the United States. Thurgood Marshall was born in Baltimore, Maryland, he graduated from Lincoln University and from Howard University Law School. Thurgood began his legal career at the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Working his way up to Chief Legal Officer, Thurgood ran the effort to end racial segregation for the next twenty years. One of Thurgood’s most famous cases argued was Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On February 24, 1803, the Marbury v. Madison takes place. This case is considered one of the most important cases in Supreme Court history. The case determines traditions of judicial review and reshapes Supreme Court as an equal branch of the federal government. One of Jefferson’s greatest achievements happens on April 30, 1803, when the Louisiana Purchase treaty is signed. This agreement doubled the size of the United States, giving territory from the Mississippi river to the Rocky Mountains.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays