Plain view doctrine

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 36 of 44 - About 438 Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sheraton Hotel located in downtown Memphis, TN is classified as a convention hotel and is known as the leader in the convention segment. The newly renovated location is neighboring the popular Memphis Cook Convention Center and towers the downtown areas with up to 600 guest rooms to vacate. This Hotel, with versatile square footage of 16,000+, is known for being the largest hotel in the Memphis area. The Sheraton Downtown Memphis address is 250 N Main St, Memphis, TN 38103. The location is…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Broader Context: The Gospel of Luke In order to best understand how to properly interpret Luke 16:1-13, it is best to first read the passage in light of its surrounding context—the entire book of Luke. In his introduction, Luke clearly states his purpose in writing this gospel: “so that you may know the exact truth about the things you have been taught,” (Luke 1:4). This is Luke 's purpose statement, but what is the truth the Luke is trying to demonstrate? The main theme Luke wants to convey…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    under those circumstances. However, the court in Long had ruled that if police lacked probable cause in believing that the object in plain view was contraband then conducting a further search to make the object apparent would make the plain view doctrine unwarranted with the seizure of the contraband. The Minnesota Supreme Court, thus, rejected the plain view doctrine because, first, the sense of touch was inherently unreliable compared to the sense of sight. secondly, the sense of touch was…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    home to reach the accused, the marijuana was in clear view, therefore, as an officer of the court seizing it at that time was a legal obligation. Moreover, this type of seize is justifiable under the plain view doctrine and does not violate the rights given to the accused under the Fourth Amendment. Hendrix (2013) explains that “in Harris v. United States (1968), the Supreme Court established that anything a police officer sees in plain view, when the officer has a right to be where he or she is…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    seizure, as well as other rights such as the plain view doctrine; have been set in place by officials for everyone’s protection. The plain view doctrine allows an act of seizure to take place as long as evidence is in plain view, which in this case is. If this response were simply a knock and talk, it…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exigent circumstances are okay only when ca officer feels it was an emergency then no probable cause or warrant is needed. Stop and frisk searches are when the cops believe they are dealing with a dangerous person. Plain view searches is whe something illegal is right there in plain view of the officer to be used a evidence while making an arrest during a crime scene. Open field searches are when the open field and pastures are not protected by the constitution can be searched. (Lyman…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Welcome, class of 2014. New recruits, you have learned much in your training and you are now ready to hit the streets. You will be assigned a training officer for a few months and will be paired up with an experienced officer after some time. But before you go out on the streets, we need to discuss a few things. You will no longer be dealing with instructors and textbooks, you will be dealing with real people and must avoid the slightest hint of impropriety. Police persons must be shining…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    says that no warrant should be issued but only by probable cause supported by an oath or a place to be searched or items to be seized. There is seven exception for the fourth amendment search warrant requirement that are lawful arrest, consent, plain view, caretaker function, inventory/impounded vehicles and motor vehicle. Lawful arrest Lawful arrest does not require a search warrant when arresting someone. The officer can search the person and any area surrounding the person. The police search…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    interpretation, it is later disputed in the court as to whether a warrant should have been issued. Another example of when you do not need a warrant is the plain view doctrine. This state anything in plain view of an officer my be seized without a search warrant. The court case Arizona v. Hicks, is a perfect example of how the plain view doctrine is used. In this case, police officers investigated a shooting in Hicks apartment. The police came across very expensive looking stereos that looked…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Petitioner also challenged the logic of the government’s argument that the jury instruction constituted plain error. For Petitioner, if the error was so egregious, the government should have objected at trial. Indeed, in other contexts, appellate courts applied the plain error doctrine to legal questions that were contested at the underlying trial, not in situations where there was no objection, and therefore no dispute, between the parties. In support of this argument, Petitioner analogized to…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Page 1 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 44