Family court

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 42 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Forensic readiness plan is simply having the ability of collecting evidence that can be admissible to court or any other platform where it is appropriate. Having an effective forensic readiness plan helps the organisation have the ability to collect evidence, preserve the evidence, and analyse the evidence to know the extent of an issue which is important when legal action is inevitable. Legal bodies (courts) depend on facts and evidence to make judgement. Therefore, having an effective forensic…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Court Narrative Essay

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1) Narrative of Student/Court employee discussions: 1. I know people have different attorneys, but that one lady has defended multiple people here for different things today. What is her job title? And what does she do? - Her job title is a Public Defender. If the defendant does not have a lot of money, they can hire her and she will defend you. 2. Right before the judge walks in, one of the bailiffs says, “All rise Court is now in session.” Why do we have to stand up when the judge walks in?…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Law enforcement use: Currently, law enforcement has the power to use a great amount of discretion when dealing with incentivized criminal informants. In the majority of cases involving law enforcement discretion it is for example an individual being caught selling a small amount of drugs but law enforcement offers to let them go without any charges if they give up the name and location of the bigger dealer. The idea behind this is understandable, but it leads to wrongful convictions. The…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    detail about the responsibilities of a sheriff when detaining a prisoner from another county or when jailing a minor. In article 2 it specifies the proceedings of a commitment hearing, such as, bonds, warrants, the witness’s responsibility to appear in court, the time that is given to be prepared for the case, and hearing the evidence provided in a case. Article 3 sets the instructions for indictments and what that means for officers, children and other specific indictments. The 4th section is…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When charged with a DWI, there are some important things you need to know about your options. First, if you're considering defending yourself, forget about it. Facing a DWI charge is not the time to be thinking about doing it yourself. Talk to a legal professional who has experience representing individuals in DWI cases. Hiring a DWI lawyer is the first important step following an arrest for a DWI. But how do you know you are getting the right lawyer for your circumstances? The bottom line is…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just Justice Fair

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    more experienced when it comes to actual criminal cases. Remember those caseloads? All of those cases in a short period of time means that the Public defenders while on the job went through way more criminal cases than a lawyer who simply practiced family law. This point may come across as valid, but once again the evidence is circumstantial and therefore cannot determine that the entire judicial system is defunct because of…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A counter argument to ‘State v. Black’ would of course be the case of ‘State v. Oliver.’ Yet, this case should not apply to my client nor should it have an effect on the outcome of his case. Other than the fact that both of the husbands in each case disciplined their wives, there are no similarities to be drawn. Yes, both husbands did hit their significant others, but this argument is a weak one, as one husband (Richard Oliver) was far crueler, inflicted major physical damage and perhaps had ill…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    American Jury System Is the American jury system still a good idea today? The American jury system was a system first started in England hundreds of years ago. If in the community a crime were committed the accused would be brought to court with a judge and jury. I believe the jury system is still a good idea for today’s community for the reason that it keeps citizens involved in the judicial branch. Also the jury is usually correct. Lastly it keeps the civic rituals of the jury system. I…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States courts have seven key types of jurisdiction. The first type of jurisdiction is personal jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction is the authority the court has over the person. The second type of jurisdiction is subject matter jurisdiction. Subject Matter Jurisdiction is the authority granted upon a court to hear a particular type of case. The third type of jurisdiction is geographical jurisdiction. Geographical jurisdiction is the authority the court has to hear cases that arise…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Angela M. Blythe, lawyer, 51, Oakland, Maryland, was sentenced by a government jury of plotting to confer bank extortion, bank misrepresentation and two checks of putting forth a false expression to a bank. Blythe was a lawyer authorized to practice in Maryland and West Virginia, with an office in Oakland, Maryland. She was a settlement lawyer in land exchanges. As indicated by proof displayed at the nine day trial, from 2000 to 2006, Blythe arranged deeds, home loans and notes utilizing false…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Page 1 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 50