Administrative Appeals Tribunal

This case arises out of damages sustained to a 397-unit apartment complex in Camp Springs, Maryland. The Owner, Metropolitan Apartments at Camp Springs, LLC (“Metropolitan”), incurred significant property damage following a magnitude 5.8 earthquake that occurred on August 23, 2011. (E. 1013). Appellee is WCS Construction, LLC (“WCS”), which served as the general contractor and construction manager of the project called “Town Center at Camp Springs Apartments.” (E. 947) Appellant is the…

Case 5: “Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., et al. v. Weyerhaeuser Co., No. 8:2011cv0047 (Md. Dist. Ct.Jan. 6, 2011)”. Facts. In August 1998, Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) signed a separate contract with Clark Construction Group, LLC (Clark) to construct CBF’s headquarters in Annapolis, Maryland, and Clark, in March 2000, made a purchase order with Weyerhaeuser Company, the defendant in this case, in order to supply Parallams, which is a LEED recycled product, for the columns in this project.…

Facts: The accused, Robert William Latimer was initially charged with the second degree murder of his daughter Tracy Latimer. Tracy was a quadriplegic with severe cerebral palsy causing her to be immobile with the mental capacity of a four month old baby only able to communicate through facial expressions. Her condition, caused by neurological damage had led to up to six seizures a day forcing her need of on the clock care. Tracy soon developed scoliosis which is the abnormal arch of one's…

In the Supreme Court case, Nelson v. Colorado, the judgment revolves around the constitutionality of the Colorado Exoneration Act. This act stated that monetary fines paid due to conviction charges can only be returned to the exonerated individual if they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are innocent of the accused crime. The constitutionality of this law was debated and in question in regards to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. I concur in the…

The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the United States can be a quite confusing and complex matter. To begin with, every judgment not from the state in which enforcement is sought, is considered a “foreign judgment” regardless of whether the judgment is from another state within the United States or a foreign country. Luckily for foreign judgments from sister states, the Full Faith and Credit Clause of Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution applies.…

Monday she was ineligible said moderator Ian Auzenne who is the vice president of the Acadiana Press Club. “Yesterday district judge Alonzo Harris of St. Landry parish ruled Anseman was ineligible to run,” he said. “Anseman filed an appeal on his ruling and because the appeal is a lengthy process she will not be able to attend.” Theall, 60, main point of discussion at the forum was emphasizing her qualification to fill the remaining eight years of judge James “Jimmy” Genovese’s 10-year…

This case takes place in the Supreme Court of Washington. This is a state court case. It is a civil case, appealed by the defendants, from the court of appeals decision. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s decision. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals. This case was decided in 2014. Issue: Did the Court of Appeals err in determining that plaintiffs may hold Tremont Group Holding liable on Washington state securities act negligence and negligent…

Exam 2 1. Impeachment is the accomplishment of calling into examination the honesty or validity of something. There is a two-step process to the impeachment process. It is looked upon by the House of Representatives, and must pass a simple majority of those present and voting. Upon pass being approved, the offender has been impeached. It’s stated in Article II that the President, Vice President, and all public officers of the U.S shall be detached from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction…

day smoking ad is attempting to stop people, James Twitchell refers to as “Experiencers” in his passage, “What We Are To Advertisers”. The strategy that this anti smoking advertisement is using to prevent consumers from smoking is utilizing, human appeals such as the need for feeling safe, as well as the need to have guidance. Pathos also plays a big role in this advertisement, pathos targets consumers emotions by doing so, ads draw more attention to themselves. This advertisement is clearly…

Only monetary claims may be the subject of a Rule 167 offer. Lauren is seeking the court to impose a constructive trust (an equitable remedy) on 10% of future inspection sales generated by Hartford and State Farm. While this is an equitable remedy, the imposition of the constructive trust will result in monetary damages. The issue is whether this would classify as a monetary claim for rule 167 purposes? Under rule 167.2, “an offer must not include non-monetary claims and other claims to which…