3rd Circuit Court Incident Summary

Improved Essays
“Experience,” was the message Susan Theall voiced at a forum held at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette Tuesday afternoon.

Theall and Vanessa Anseman were initially scheduled to debate but Anseman was not able attended after a district judge Alonzo Harris ruled Monday she was ineligible said moderator Ian Auzenne who is the vice president of the Acadiana Press Club.

“Yesterday district judge Alonzo Harris of St. Landry parish ruled Anseman was ineligible to run,” he said. “Anseman filed an appeal on his ruling and because the appeal is a lengthy process she will not be able to attend.”

Theall, 60, main point of discussion at the forum was emphasizing her qualification to fill the remaining eight years of judge James “Jimmy” Genovese’s 10-year
…show more content…
“I do believe to be a judge you must be a lawyer first to know what you are doing as judge,” she said. “For example lets say someone has to rule on questions about evidence, the decision has to be made a quick and I having tried of a lot cases I’m familiar with how cases should be ruled.”

With those experience in mind Theall suggested a change in requirement to the 10 years of practicing law that is required to run for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeal.

“There is a minimum of 10 years to run for this positions,” she said. “You do not know you are as a lawyer in 10 years and I think 15-20 years should be required to run for this position.”

Theall believes her experience as a judge and lawyer will allow her keep her personal beliefs out of cases and solely make a ruling from the facts presented.

“As a judge you learn very quickly that your personal opinions don’t matter,” she said. “Your opinions are solely based off the facts and evidence in front of you.”

She alluded again on how her experience is more valuable than the other two candidates running for the 3rd Circuit Court of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Based on diverse constituents from her own experiences of crossing social and political borders she builds collectively on the problems women of color face everyday.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imay Stewart Case Study

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Who is Erma Fay Stewart? Erma Fay Stewart is a 30-year-old mother of two who lives in a small town of Hearne in Texas. She was arrested on a drug bust that she claims she was not a part of. Unfortunately, that did not make a difference with law enforcement and she was thrown in jail anyways.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    U.S Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor, a former professor at NYU School of law was honored to receive the Doctors of Law degree, and there she delivered the NYU’s 180th Commencement to all the graduates and faculty at the Yankee Stadium on May 16, 2012. In this Commencement Sotomayor was greatly welcomed by the Trustee Maria Bartiromo, Kenji Yoshino, and the Chief Justice Earl Warren Professional of Law highly introduced Sotomayor to the enthusiastic crowd as “a self-described Nuyorican” and an “early and awesome achiever.” Since the beginning of Sotomayor’s speech, it is obvious that the most effective appeal for her speech was pathos.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 78 written by Alexander Hamilton fully examined the judicial branch. In the Federalist Paper, it claimed that the Judicial neither wields the sword of the Executive Branch nor has the purse of the Legislative. The sword is the power of the Executive that controls the nation’s militia and grants the President to be the Commander-in-Chief. The power of the purse grants the Legislative Branch the ability to control the spending and tax policies of the nation. The Judicial Branch, in Hamilton’s words, “had neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment,” deeming it to be the least dangerous of the three branches.…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Informational Essay Ruth Bader Ginsburg or aka R.B.G. is notorious for her great accomplishments. You probably don’t know what she did or the achievements she have made. Ruth Ginsburg has made notable feats in gender equality, that are no small deeds, especially when you’re a mother in college, facing a sexist society, while still managing to insert females into a unfamiliar field. Ruth Joan Bader Ginsburg grew up in a low-income family in Brooklyn, New York.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She reminds her audience that, “we Democrats believe… that we can come out of a small town or a poor neighborhood and have the same chance as anyone else; and it doesn’t matter whether we are black or Hispanic or disabled or a [woman]” (Richards). With the support of the persona she established throughout her speech, Ann Richards convinces her audience that everyone deserves to be…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this model, judges act purely according to their own viewpoints, beliefs and preferences regardless of their court coworker’s reaction and response. For this reasons, this model of judicial behavior seems to lack theoretical consistency and reasoning. Judges’ policy preferences have a significant and possibly larger role in the judicial decisions making process (Ivers). Thus, legal considerations are also relevant in this process and cannot be ignored due to the fact that judges make decisions inside a legal framework.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will be discussing how a person can predict the decisions of the justices on the Supreme Court based on whether they are conservative or liberal leaning justices. Then, where does that leave the idea the that no case is prejudged? If a person can predict the decisions of the justices on the Supreme Court based on the conservative or liberal leanings of the Supreme Court justices, where does that leave the idea that no case is prejudged? The way I believe that a person predicts the decision of the justices on the Supreme Court is in part on how they interpret the constitution (Pollack, 2017).…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gender Issues In Film

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The law is a hot profession to depict in Hollywood. We can all recall countless movies focused on the legal field. Hollywood has a tendency to exaggerate situations and only cast the most beautiful specimen. However, films do have a tendency to bring to light the issues of a layperson. Films such as Legally Blonde, Erin Brockocich, and The Verdict feature women in the legal field.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After watching the movie Muhammad Ali’s Greatest Fight, many of the events/situation that occurred between the Supreme Court Justices and law clerks surprised me. First, I was fascinated by Justice Harlan’s law clerk, Kevin Connolly’s tenacity and idealistic attitude during the process of rejecting and accepting the case, Clay v. the United States. For instance, Connolly’s bravery was demonstrated when he tried to dismiss his responsibility to write the brief directed by Justice Harlan due to his political ideology.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Murder on a Sunday Morning is a documentary that follows the trial of 15 year old Brenton Butler in order to prove his innocence by displaying the ethical issues behind the case. Brenton Butler was accused for murdering Maryann Stephens who was walking with her husband to their hotel room after breakfast, when he supposedly approached Ms. Stephens and demanded for her purse at gun point, then proceeded to lift his gun and shot her in the face, leaving Mr. Stephens as the eye witness to the crime. When questioned by detectives, Mr. Stephens describes the shooter to be a tall, skinny built black male wearing a dark shirt and shorts, and a fishing hat. Police who were surveying the area spotted Brenton Butler who coincidentally fit the description. Brenton, who was on his way to apply at a local Blockbuster store was told by police of a murder that happened nearby, and was asked to go to the police station to answer questions about what he may have seen; however, the 15 year old ended up in the back of a…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The future is never clear, and my own was no exception. Thoughts of what I wanted to do with my life were always followed by uncertainty. During the entirety of my adolescence I always felt overwhelmed by my inability to decide my future, leading to a metastasizing panic in my inabilities to achieve success in any discipline. My transition from childhood fantasies to adult goals was anything but seamless and I often found myself lost, especially in academics.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Prior to English 101, I have been taking several English classes, but each class helped me little by little to an English 101 student. Learning to have efficient studying habits such as study the day of the class and not doing things last minute. Also learning how to actually study other subjects and how to think critically. This has increased my learning habits. My student habits have changed dramatically,…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays