Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Victor I been thinking about what happen in court and still don't understand this conclusion. I think we should been postpone the hearing due to the Attorney ad Litem just send her report to you that morning , was not prepare for her conclusion. According to her they already knew 3 o 4 weeks ago which way she was going to rule in favor off . With that said , I hear that my daughter husband stayed also 3 weeks ago that Mrs Moody was friends with Meredith and that was going to be in their…

The Supreme Court is tricky with some of their rulings and terms. The terms standing and justiciability are two of those tricky terms in which they more of the less mean what the Supreme Court wants them to mean. The term justiciability is a limit on whether or not the court feels that it can exercise its judicial authority. This term is tricky in the fact that it say whether the court feels it can answer a case. This term was used to decide in the case Goldwater v Carr. The term standing…

In the present action, Ndeumeni’s motion for summary judgment was based on the premise that because the alleged agreement made between Ndeumeni and Kemogne failed to satisfy the statute of frauds, she should be precluded from arguing that there was an agreement under a theory sounding in tort. Initially, we observe that in her original complaint Kemogne did allege that Ndeumeni breached a contract with her. Plainly, a breach of contract claim could not be sustained where it is undisputed that…

Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction: This court is in the lowest level of the judicial system. These courts are only authorized to hear specified types of cases such as marriage, divorce, alimony, adoption, emancipation, juvenile offenses, misdemeanors, traffic violations, small claims, inheritance, and estate settlements. This type of court goes by different names such as Justice of the Peace Courts, Municipal Courts, Constitutional County Courts, County Courts at Law, and Statutory Probate…

On October 7, 2008, the United States Supreme Court of Arizona argued case number 07-542, Arizona v. Grants and the decision towards the case was issued on April 21, 2009. Rodney Grant, the respondent/offender, was apprehended by the Arizona State Law enforcement/police because he was driving with a suspended driver’s license. Upon his apprehension and as he was securely placed in the back of the police vehicle, the police officers deliberately went ahead to search his automobile and found a bag…

Curtilage can be defined as an enclosed area or land around the proximity surrounding a home in which the grounds are utilized for daily activities of domestic living in which the homeowner has taken protocols to ensure the privacy of that area. The word curtilage plays an important part in the United States Constitution. Its determination of the Fourth Amendment is extremely important in prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures of an individual home or property by justifying a reasonable…

The Georgia court system consists of a Municipal Court, Magistrate Court, Probate Court, Juvenile Court, State Court, Superior Court, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. The Municipal Court has three hundred and seventy courts with three hundred and fifty two active Judges. The Municipal Court handles traffic offenses, local ordinance violations, conduct preliminary hearings, issue warrants, and they may handle misdemeanor shoplifting and possession of marijuana cases. The Judges in the…

The crux of the Michigan case rest largely upon nine (9) purported intercepted calls, which if proven false would not subject either brother to an indictment or to Michigan’s jurisdiction. The record lacks any evidence to prove that the lawyers filed several motions important to the outcome of the case. They did not file a Frank’s motion, a Motion to Suppress Evidence of Illegal Wiretapping under Title III and there is no motion under 901, 704 or 701 that could identify the voice or establish…

the Federal Arbitration Act. The district court granted the motion to dismiss and request to move into arbitration, which the court ruled was pursuant with the arbitration clause of Jackson’s employment contract. Jackson filed an appeal with The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and they ruled that a court must determine an arbitration agreement’s validity when the clause’s validity is in question. Rent-A-Center then appealed the decision of the Ninth Circuit to the U.S. Supreme…

Case Name: Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991) Statement of Facts: The defendant Payne broke into his girlfriend’s neighbor’s house and tried to engage in sexual activity with her, she refused then Payne became violent. He killed Charisse, a mother of two and he killed her daughter. He also severely injured her son also by stabbing him numerous times. The cops saw him walking out the house with blood on his clothing. Throughout his sentencing he got several people to testify that he had…