Mapp v. Ohio

    Page 1 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    In 1960 Ohio police were searching for a suspect they believed had involvement with a resent bombing. While investigating the case, three police officers went to the residence of Dollree Mapp who they had reason to believe was protecting the fugitive or had information of their whereabouts. When the officers arrived at her home they asked Mapp to open the door and let them come in to search her home. She contacted her attorney at the time and he advised her not to let them in without a warrant. The police, who knowingly did not have legal permission to enter, left the residence. Some hours later they returned and told the woman to again grant them access into her home. This time she did not answer them and after some time one police officer…

    Words: 1223 - Pages: 5
  • Mapp V. Ohio Case Analysis

    Ohio allowed the American criminal justice system to realize that there was still a communication problem between federal and state departments of justice. “At the time of the case unlawfully seized evidence was banned from federal courts but not state courts” (Mapp v. Ohio Podcast). When there is a deviation between the two systems, in certain cases, then problems can arise. In this case, a problem arose and the federal judges of the U.S. Supreme Court had a decision to make, in the realm of…

    Words: 1124 - Pages: 5
  • Mapp V. Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio was a notable landmark supreme court case that focuses on the fourth amendment which is protection from unreasonable search and seizures being violated. In this case, Dollree Mapp’s fourth amendment right was violated. In a 5-3 majority of Mapp’s favor, I reject the dissenting opinion. In Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion, he argued that the majority had faced the wrong issue in their decision. He explains that since Mapp was in violation of possession of lewd and obscene…

    Words: 629 - Pages: 3
  • Achman Case Study

    for something that wasn 't included in the search warrant? It wasn 't in Plainview. If it was in Plainview, then it would be admissible in court as evidence but it wasn 't. This reminds me of Horton V.…

    Words: 748 - Pages: 3
  • The 14th Amendment And The Bill Of Rights

    public reasons. The Bill of Rights was first applied to the states in 1925 in the Supreme Court in the Gitlow v. New York case. In this case Benjamin Gitlow was a Socialist Party member and he was convicted of writing some revolutionary pamphlets in defiance of the New York’s Criminal Anarchy Act. Gitlow’s argument was that New York’s law violated the First Amendment which protects citizen’s freedom of speech. The Supreme Court…

    Words: 1372 - Pages: 5
  • Supreme Court Case Weeks Vs Usa Essay

    can be looked at like a way for law enforcements to conduct searches and seizures that do not violate the Fourth Amendment and individuals that have had their rights violated. This legal rule first made its appearance during the U.S. Supreme court case Weeks v. United States (1914). Freemont Weeks was arrested under suspicion of using the U.S. mail to transmit lottery tickets. The purpose for this rule can be looked at like a way for law enforcements to conduct searches and seizures that do not…

    Words: 937 - Pages: 4
  • The Exclusionary Rule

    circumstances when the law enforcement receives evidence on a silver platter. Mapp vs. Ohio case The Mapp vs. Ohio is also considered as another landmark case that the exclusionary rule is applied to criminal prosecutions at the state level. The Cleveland police forced their way into Ms Dolree Mapp’s house in search of a bombing suspect. The law enforcement did not obtain a search warrant prior to entering Miss Mapp’s residence. They did not find the bombing suspect, but they did manage to…

    Words: 1087 - Pages: 5
  • Essay On Exclusionary Rule

    One of the most controversial, and perhaps,most important American legal principle, is the exclusionary clause which under Constitutional law, holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of defendants constitutional rights is not permitted for use in criminal persecutions. Sparked by the famous case Mapp v. Ohio, the exclusionary rule has a fair share of critics who argue that police blunders let criminals go free. In the 1961 Supreme Court case, Dollree Mapp was convicted when police…

    Words: 1086 - Pages: 5
  • Exclusionary Rule Disadvantages

    help stop illegal searches and seizures. The fourth amendment was undermined, until the police and many law enforcement agencies realized their evidences acquired through all these illegal means were going to be tossed out in court. The exclusionary rule helped to enforce the fourth amendment. Under the fifth amendments of the constitutions, all citizens were granted the right not to testify against their own self, and also no citizen shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due…

    Words: 854 - Pages: 4
  • Supreme Court Case Paper

    Thesis This paper will discuss the cases of: Weeks v United States, Mapp v Ohio, Gideon v Wainwright and Scott v Harris. This paper will discuss which of these cases was the most important and it has impacted the criminal justice system. Each of these four Cases answered questions that influenced the criminal justice system to a whole new level. Mapp v Ohio: Police illegally entered the home of Dollree Mapp without a warrant. Officers were initially searching her home for a fugitive, but…

    Words: 701 - Pages: 3
  • Previous
    Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50

Related Topics:

Popular Topics: