Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

Improved Essays
Show More
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Facts
Police officers in Cleveland, Ohio forced their way into Dollree Mapp’s home without a search warrant after being refused admission. The officers believed there was a suspect and equipment from a bombing-case in the home. The officers conducted a thorough search and found literature that could be used against Mapp for a conviction. The Ohio Supreme Court upheld Mapp’s conviction. The American Civil Liberties Union filed an amicus brief on behalf of Mapp to the Supreme Court.
Issue
Can evidence obtained in violation the Fourth Amendment be used in state courts?
Rule
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, houses, and effects. Wolf v. Colorado (1949)

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Walker Vs Ohio Case Study
    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Walker Vs Ohio Case Study

    Ohio case. If you think about it, one case is dealing with a homicide while the other case is dealing with kids going to school. The similarity between the two cases is the religious beliefs. In the Wisconsin V. Yoder case the religious side won in the court system because it did not involve physical harm to a human being where in the Walker V. Ohio case the state won because the safety of a little infant was neglected. The other side may claim that the safety of the Amish students was being violated but we are talking the difference between life and death.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Da Vs Harris Case Study
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Da Vs Harris Case Study

    Florida v. Harris & Florida v. Jardines, both are related to the fourth amendment. Although, citizens have right to be secure against unreasonable search. The reliability of dogs to sniff was questioned in court of law. Also 4th amendment was questioned in these cases.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Weeks Vs Usa Essay
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Weeks Vs Usa Essay

    The purpose for this rule can be looked at like a way for law enforcements to conduct searches and seizures that do not violate the Fourth Amendment and individuals that have had their rights violated. This legal rule first made its appearance during the U.S. Supreme court case Weeks v. United States (1914). Freemont Weeks was arrested under suspicion of using the U.S. mail to transmit lottery tickets. Once he was arrested, officers searched his office without a warrant and found evidence of what he was being suspected of. They also searched Weeks home without a warrant, but found no evidence.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Case Of Irvine V. California
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Case Of Irvine V. California

    But he also thought that things had changed since he was a district attorney. The professional criminal of the Prohibition and Depression era knew what he was doing and took his chances. The average criminal of the 1950s and 1960s, though, might have turned to crime because of disadvantages or because of degradation (Warren, 1977). The criminal procedure cases coming before the Warren Court involved, from Warren’s point of view, principles of fairness and equality that were all part of the Constitution.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is The Fourth Amendment Important
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is The Fourth Amendment Important

    McKayla Magdaleno Mr.Young P.3 10/05/15 Bill of Rights Essay Hook: It’s 1798 and you’re helping construct and write the Bill of Rights, it’s super hot outside and you really just want to go home because you are only on the making of the 4th Amendment right as you get up to leave you get a brilliant idea on what the 4th Amendment should be. Statement: The first amendment reads “The right of the people to be secured in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly, describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Robinson V. California Case Study
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robinson V. California Case Study

    Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case
    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moot Court Case

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is The Fourth Amendment Important
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is The Fourth Amendment Important

    After finding out the officers violated the 4th amendment the judgment of this court was reversed. In order for this search to be legal there would have to be a good reason to search the house. This reason would be used to try to get a search warrant. Because they did not get a warrant, it is illegal. Even if the evidence is strong, it is not allowed to be used in…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Fourth Amendment
    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Fourth Amendment

    Ohio brings challenge to the fourth amendment. A landmark case is a court case that is studied because it has historical and legal significance. In Mapp v. Ohio police were suspicious that Dollree Mapp might be hiding a person suspected in a bombing in her home therefore they barged into her house pretending to have a search warrant. The police found a trunk containing pornographic materials. The police then arrested Mapp and charged her with violating an Ohio law against the possession of obscene materials.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Consent: The Fourth Amendment
    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Consent: The Fourth Amendment

    The Fourth Amendment grants property rights to citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. Consent is one of the most frequently used exceptions to the Fourth Amendment. Determining if a person has the authority to grant consent is an issue unique to computers. Today, technology enables multiple users to log on to a computer using multiple passwords and profiles and create multiple accounts and screen names. A password is analogous to a key that can be used to open a locked container.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Patriot Act: The Dangers Of The Patriot Act
    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Patriot Act: The Dangers Of The Patriot Act

    The Fourth Amendment prohibits the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures. The American Civil Liberties Union also states that “ Section 215 of the patriot Act violates the first amendment as well. ”(www. ACLU.org) The first Amendment gives the people the right of freedom of speech.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Four Amendments Of The Bill Of Rights Analysis
    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Four Amendments Of The Bill Of Rights Analysis

    The question of the case against Mapps was if the evidence obtained through the search violated the Fourth Amendment and should it been allowed for criminal proceeding…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment
    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case: Mapp Vs. Ohio
    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: Mapp Vs. Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, after reading the case file this case should not have ever made it to the Supreme Court or any court in the land. This case was doomed from the beginning due to police misconduct that has opened a crack in a door for criminals to slide through. Should the exclusionary rule be abolished? I do believe that court’s ruling regarding Mapp v. Ohio affect the day-to-day police work of our Officers. Peradventure, that the police are serving a legal warrant to pick up robbery suspect who also is a known drug dealer, because of the exclusionary rule from Mapp v. Ohio when the police arrive at the suspect address, they are not allow to search the home looking for drugs unless the warrant stipulates.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings