Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

Great Essays
In 1960 Ohio police were searching for a suspect they believed had involvement with a resent bombing. While investigating the case, three police officers went to the residence of Dollree Mapp who they had reason to believe was protecting the fugitive or had information of their whereabouts. When the officers arrived at her home they asked Mapp to open the door and let them come in to search her home. She contacted her attorney at the time and he advised her not to let them in without a warrant. The police, who knowingly did not have legal permission to enter, left the residence. Some hours later they returned and told the woman to again grant them access into her home. This time she did not answer them and after some time one police officer …show more content…
Mapp v. Ohio set the standard for the exclusionary rule, meaning that the States now too fell under the rule. Police today cannot search or seize any items with a search warrant. Furthermore, because of the case of Katz v. United States, the police are required to demonstrate “probable cause” for any investigative activity that is in violation of a citizen’s expectation of privacy. Today law enforcement still has to be granted a warrant to search through a person’s belongings. Although if a person is openly in violation of the law and the evidence is in plain view, a police officer can perform a search, without a warrant. While people will fight this and do not like this idea, it is still the law and the police will use this ability to obtain the evidence they want. Also a warrantless search is legal when, the suspect has given consent, the police are already in pursuit of the defendant, or the search is incidental to a lawful arrest. In addition, if police are granted a search warrant by the court and they carry out the search only to find out that the warrant itself was not valid through no fault of their own, the items seize can still be used because the police were acting under good faith and are protected under the good faith exception. While the police are still held to the standard of the law and its requirements to perform a lawful search, citizens should still be aware that their privacy is not formally protected under the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peradventure, that the police are serving a legal warrant to pick up robbery suspect who also is a known drug dealer, because of the exclusionary rule from Mapp v. Ohio when the police arrive at the suspect address, they are not allow to search the home looking for drugs unless the warrant stipulates. Because of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Mapp v. Ohio complicates law enforcement with bureaucracy and suppresses simple law enforcement.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Probable cause, holds a belief given by facts and more of concrete evidence of a crime. For example, police need reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk and individual. While, in probable cause must exist if the police obtain a search warrant. However, Law enforcement officers do not have to have justification to stop someone on a public street to ask questions. Under the Fourth Amendment; individuals are…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Police Arrest

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the police officer does not arrest the suspect, this is called non-invocation discretion. Non-invocation discretion means when the police officers invoke the law based on their decision. In cases like this, officers try to solve problems in a certain way that avoids formal processing that could lead to negative consequences. Most police work consists of problem solving, and arresting individuals is how they solve problems. When the police officers made the decision of not arresting the individual, nobody knows about it beside the individual and the police officer.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At this point, a pretrial motion to dismiss without prejudice is fair due to the misconduct of police and the violation of the client 's Fourth Amendment Rights. "In other areas of constitutional law and criminal procedure, the Court now routinely engages in textual interpretation informed by history, yet the debate over the exclusionary rule still seems to lack any foothold in conventional constitutional interpretation" (Re, pg. 5). There should be no interpretation whether or not the client 's rights were violated due to the facts in the case that the police blatantly without regard to the U.S. Constitution and showed true police…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alomar phone should be excluded because the law that authorized the search itself was not reasonable. During the search of the cell phone Det. Colabello should not have opened the photo of the handgun due to the fact that it was not legally authorized nor was there any legal reasoning to open the photos. Legally, officers are permitted to search and gather evidence illegally when they suspect the evidence needed will be destroyed in the time need to apply and receive a warrant. Which is known as “Hot Pursuit”.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arrest warrants are issued to allow the police to identify and locate a person, or persons. These persons are usually those who have been previous arrest, released on bail, but then fail to show up to court after their release, in contrast a search warrant allows the police to enter into a promise, in search of evidence or contraband that may be used in an upcoming trial. In order to take possession of an item, and that property to be searched it must be specifically listed in the search warrant. The police are limited to only what is indicated in the warrant after its approved by a judge. ( John Worrall.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Victim Blaming Women

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When Marie go raped she did not turn to the police first instead, she called her mother and then decided what to to do. Then after they called the cops but the situation did not seem so real that they made a report about her rapist due to everything that he used was in her home and was very careful about what he did. According to studies "In another case, relationships between the victim and known assailant are…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although S 5(2) orders the council to consult with the community, s 5(3), the council still holds the power to decide whether the resolution is necessary or not, regardless of the community’s opinion. It also does not specify how and which part of the community is to be contacted. On the other hand, the legislation does provide officers with discretionary power in s 7. Analogously to Entick, where an officer searched the plaintiff’s residence without a warrant. Nonetheless, through s 7, it becomes state necessary that the officers arrest persons displaying or wearing gang insignia without a warrant.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Warrantless Searches Essay

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Warrantless searches include: consent, plain-view, search incident prior to an arrest, exigent circumstances, automobile exception, and hot pursuit (Justia: Criminal Law, n.d). If consent is given voluntarily by a person then the area may be searched without a warrant. For example, if police want to search someone’s backpack and the person agrees to them searching there is no need for a search warrant. Plain-view is like stated earlier if an object is out in plain sight then the item can be seized as evidence. However, it must be completely in plain sight, an officer is not allowed to move an item to gain access or see another.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment is meant to protect the citizen from unreasonable seizures and searches without a warrant. This includes having their homes, persons, and items in their homes searched by police as well as other officials. Following the Amendment, if a police officer suspects that a citizen has is perpetrating or is taking part in a crime, the office has first to obtain a warrant legally. The warrant has to be granted by a judge before the offer can enter the property of the suspect as he or she searches for evidence. This amendment has been observed to have both negative and negative impact on law enforcement.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays