Pervear V. Massachusetts Case Study

Decent Essays
Pervear v. Massachusetts was a case over the issue of prisoners' rights brought to the United States Supreme Court in 1866. The Court was asked to rule on fines imposed upon a liquor dealer by the state. Pervear was licensed by the United States under the current internal revenue code to keep and sell liquor. He was fined and sentenced to three months of hard labor for failing to have a state license for his liquor store. He pleaded that he had a license from the United States under the internal revenue acts of Congress, he had paid a tax for the keeping and selling of intoxicating liquors, and that the fine and punishment imposed and inflicted by the law of Massachusetts was cruel, excessive, and unusual. Pervear believed the state law was

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Case Facts: On August 7th, 1999 a Maryland police officers legally stopped a car for speeding in the early morning hours. The car was occupied by three men, to include the Defendant/Appellee Joseph Jermaine Pringle. The Officer that initiated the stop saw a large roll of cash in the glovebox while the driver was retrieving his registration. All men were checked and cleared for outstanding warrants and a warning was issued to the vehicles driver. The officer requested and was granted permission to search the vehicle.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of the State of New Hampshire v. Sondra Murray, Ms. Murray was charged with disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, and possession of marijuana. She was convicted of the disorderly conduct which violated N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 644:2, and possession of marijuana, which violated N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland the state of Maryland taxed the Baltimore branch of the first national bank, which the bank refused to pay was consequently sued. The supreme court of Maryland ruled and said that the constitution is silent on about the federal power to establish a bank and therefore Maryland was free to tax the bank. Chief Justice Marshall overruled this hearing and stated that congress could rule on implied powers required to operate a functional national government and states that try to do so are unconstitutional. The major question that was ruled in this case was does congress have the authority to establish a national bank and if so could the state ta it. Another question was if the national government could sustain…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Elridge V.: Case Study

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Elbridge’s divorced in 2010 and Mrs. Gwen Eldridge was awarded custody of their two minor children. Mr. Eldridge was ordered to make child support payments of $700 per month. He lost his job as an electrician in January of 2011 and was unemployed from that date through October of 2011. Upon which Mr. Eldridge received a job in his field as an electrician. Unfortunately, Mr. Eldridge did not make child support payments for the 10 months that he was unemployed.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I too think that having a gun on school grounds is a serious crime. In the case of United Sates v. Lopez it should have only been up to the state to punish him, but that wasn't the case. Lopez's crime should not have been punishable under the Commerce Crime and that was exactly what the ruling upheld. The Commerce Crime had nothing to do with the Gun Free School Zone Act and therefore it was unconstitutional. Great discussion.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Ewing v. California, 583 U.S. 11 (2003) — Facts: George Ewing walked into a pro shop of a Los Angeles County golf course where he concealed and stole three golf clubs priced at $399 a piece. Aside from this incident, Ewing had several prior convictions, four of which were serious, violent, and/or felonious. In this case, Ewing was convicted of felony grand theft and sentenced to 25 years to life under California’s three-strike law. Procedural History: the California Court of Appeal and the Second Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The State Supreme Court denied review, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, as well as upheld the decisions of the lower courts.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    State V. Rallia The following is the facts, legal research and charge recommendation for case against twenty-five year old, Bill Rallia. The following charges are recommended: Conspiracy for attempted armed robbery, carrying of a concealed weapon, attempt of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, and second degree murder. In the case against Thomas the following charges are recommended: unlawful possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to sell, maintaining a drug property and failure to intervene. These charges are recommended based off the fact of the case and Florida law.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State V. Evans Case Study

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of State v. Evans, 671 N.W.2d 720, (2003). , we see the distress of the victim that suffered from both harassment and stalking from her predator for a period that span more than three years (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassment aspect that Hubert Evans summited the victim, Rebecca Arnold, to started out at a very slow rate with it become more intense and leading to stalking over years leading to the arrest of Mr. Evans and criminal conviction for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The rule of law governing search and seizure is the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution which states, in part, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause…” The constitution does not provide definition of what constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure, nor does it define the term effects as it pertains to the venue being searched in this instance. Thus, case law interpreting these provisions must be analyzed to determine the protection of a person in their mobile home as it was not considered during the amendment’s creation. The initial case interpreting the Fourth…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Facts Police officers in Cleveland, Ohio forced their way into Dollree Mapp’s home without a search warrant after being refused admission. The officers believed there was a suspect and equipment from a bombing-case in the home. The officers conducted a thorough search and found literature that could be used against Mapp for a conviction.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Privacy rights is an issue that dates back to the nineteen hundreds. Even though there is a disagreement where the right of privacy is specifically stated in the constitution, Supreme Court justices have agreed that the right to privacy does exist. One major concern regarding the right to privacy is the issue of consensual adult women having the ability to freely use contraceptives without government intrusion. The use to freely use contraceptives was a major issue from 1873 when the Comstock Law of 1873 originated making it illegal to sell or promote anything that dealt with contraception or abortion etc. This paper will discuss three articles that brings light to the privacy concerns about using contraceptives.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The case posed questions regarding the conduct of an inmate who participated in assisting fellow prisoners in planning the appeals for a writ of habeas corpus and any other legal papers. The amendment in scrutiny was the 28 U.S.C ~ 2242 that violates such prisoner actions. C. 384 US 436 (1966) Miranda v. Arizona Argued 2/28/66; 3/1/66; 3/2/66 Decided Jun 13, 1966 On March 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for the allegations of rape and kidnapping.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays