Page 1 of 3 - About 23 Essays
  • Helen Longino Epistemological Analysis

    Helen Longino is a feminist epistemologist who argues that in order to reduce the chance of having subjective beliefs and have more objective knowledge, we must expand our epistemic communities. I think that Longino’s solution is more palatable than either foundationalism or coherentism. An epistemic community is the community that we hold our beliefs in. By expanding that community, there are more inputs on certain beliefs. If I have a belief that coincides with my epistemic community, but my community consists of people who have the same biases, our viewpoint is limited and, therefore, may be false. If I have a community that is large and diverse, there is a better chance that my bias will be addressed by others in the community. Longino…

    Words: 911 - Pages: 4
  • Essay On Naturalized Epistemology

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it…

    Words: 597 - Pages: 3
  • The Infinite Regress Argument Analysis

    Specifically, it attempts an account of explanations that end with “non-inferentially justified belief”, by showing the existence of beliefs with a certain property that makes it appropriately basic and indefeasible. This strategy consists of relating claims to know to a foundation, which is asserted to be true, which can be correctly applied to yield knowledge. In this manner, foundationalism aims to provide an alternative to the regression problem – that the chain of reasons can come to rest…

    Words: 1084 - Pages: 5
  • Response To Bonjour's Argument

    Bonjour considers two responses to his argument, externalism and givenism. I would be talking about Bonjours views and arguments on externalism and giving his thoughts and view on the topic. I would also be concerning his counter argument and explaining his views on it and why he disagrees with it. I also would be going over his foundationalist view and some of his thoughts on it. I also would be going over his regress argument. Bonjour thinks that there are two different responses for his…

    Words: 1163 - Pages: 5
  • Paul Helm's Scriptures And Truth

    It had points that made sense with great logic and interpretations of what the Word of God is. It also had reasons that were not suitable for what should go with knowing the Bible. The fact of externalism and foundationalism are contradictory to what the true meaning of Christianity is.With the belief of externalism and foundationalism, they seemed to distance how to actually figure out the ways to become a part of God’s life. If we limited ourselves to only search for the evidence of the…

    Words: 1530 - Pages: 7
  • Essay On Coherentism

    to knowledge, it is thought that these beliefs should be justified. Coherentism is a form of internal, non-linear justification which holds the idea that for a belief to be justified in any way it must cohere with a current system of beliefs. BonJour wrote that 'what justifies beliefs is the way they fit together' , in essence, for beliefs to be justified they must metaphorically form a lattice like structure, where they each support each other, creating a non-linear structure of justification.…

    Words: 1453 - Pages: 6
  • Moral Relativism Essay

    Views on Moral Relativism Relativism is one of the main concepts of ethics. Most moral theorist relate to ethics within their articles that they had written, either being against moral relativism or being supporters. Throughout Mary Midgley’s article “Trying Out One’s New Sword,” she argues about the problems that are related to moral relativism. Another philosopher, John Arthur wrote an article “Religion, Morality and Conscience,” which also addresses the issue of relativism from the…

    Words: 1045 - Pages: 5
  • Examples Of Descartes Argument On God Existence

    that he caused himself, which he says is false because if he would have created himself, he would have made himself perfect. Then he says “my always having existed” which he states does not solve the problem because if he is a dependent being, he needs to be continually sustained by another. Third he says his parents, but this ultimately causes infinite regress. Fourth he states that something less perfect than God created him, but he says that the idea of perfection that he has, could not come…

    Words: 731 - Pages: 3
  • Reading And Discussion Questions On Critical Thinking

    and that truth must be unchanging, eternal, and perfect. 11. Rationalism is a method of acquiring knowledge by means of logic and reason it claims that knowledge is arrived at by means of our minds. Empiricism is a method of acquiring knowledge by means of observation, inquiry, and experience. 12. A posterior knowledge is acquired after some experience. For example: I know that the book will fall down after I release it. I know that the sun sets in the west. A prior is arrived at without…

    Words: 847 - Pages: 4
  • Rousseau's Foundationalist Conservatism

    Rousseau demonstrates his foundationalism by advocating for a government that flows from the means of the “general will” to achieve the end of the “public good.” While Rousseau supports liberty in the form of revolution, he offers stipulations which culminate in his conception of the “general will.” In a sense, Rousseau’s concept of the general will would fall into the category of foundationalist conservatism. Rousseau’s proclamation that “Every legitimate government is republican” demonstrates…

    Words: 868 - Pages: 4
  • Previous
    Page 1 2 3

Related Topics:

Popular Topics: