Cosmological argument

Through the Argument of Possibility and Necessity, the existence of God is proven. Possibility is having the tendency to stop existing or being contingent. Necessity is a form from itself, which could not possibly have failed to exist. These two concepts and forms of being and the way they interact represent the existence of God. Thomas Aquinas, medieval theologian and philosopher, asserted and taught Five Ways to prove the existence of God. One argument of these five that I find to be…

I believe that “The Cosmological Argument” for God is still quite valid, my reasons for defending this argument have been produced after a great deal of reflection on the matter, I have concluded that the argument is still quite useful. To best describe the argument, it is the conclusion that “nothing comes from nothing” as was stated by St. Aquinas, in other words God must exist because if there was nothing then we needed something to “call it into existence” so to speak. This coincides…

The existence of the universe stands in need of explanation. The only explanation that is logical is that God created it. (Holt, The Kalam Cosmological Argument) The universe is thought to have a beginning in time that its existence is thought to stand in need of explanation. (Holt, The Kalam Cosmological Argument) God created the moral law for three reasons. He created to show how his true character is. The moral law is God’s way of telling his people the path he ways them to go down. You are…

Zachary Burnham Philosophy 220 Professor: John Shea September 24, 2015 First Exam The ontological argument for existence of God was introduced by a monk named Anslem. St. Anslem explains his argument for existence of God by saying, “The fool said in his heart, ‘There is no God,’ but certainly that same fool having heard just what I said, “Something greater than which cannot be thought,” understands what he heard. What he understands is in his thought, but it cannot exist only in thought, for…

Colton Clemens Dr. Mayra Valadez Philosophy 101 December 7, 2017 Causal Theist 1. Conclusion: Causal theists have adopted the belief that there is sufficient evidence to prove that a deity exists. They take most of their arguments directly from Thomas Aquinas, the original causal theist. 2. Premises: They believe that they have several solid pieces of evidence, but probably their strongest case comes in the form of Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologica. a. One of the premises of causal theists…

2.1 The Rival Conceptions of God Here the author discussed the idea of how people in this world are divided into groups according to whether or not they believe in God and if they do believe in Him, they are further divided according to their beliefs about His involvement with the people of the world. As a former atheist, he discussed his view and explored the difference in the beliefs of the Pantheists, (those who believe that God is just another part of the universe, therefore, a part of…

Diana: Aquinas, I have come from the future to understand your argument in regard to God’s existence. My philosophy class sent me to figure out if your argument will help a future philosopher’s theory about meaning and purpose. Aquinas: Well, who is this philosopher you speak of? Diana: The philosopher is William Lane Craig. Aquinas: I have not heard of him. Diana: Well, of course not! He is from the future. Aquinas: Despite this man being from the future, I am still interested in what he has…

and arguments by philosophers. The existence of God is discussed well in books such as the assortments of the world and these are important as they reveal that truly the greatest being existed. It is true that the leading argument about the existence of God was presented by Anselm in the ontological argument. This philosopher argument moves to the extent of making sure that it shows well that God exists and does not, in any case, defend on jurisdictions. Philosophers while making an argument…

Over a millennium after Aristotle wrote his unmoved mover argument. The Catholic philosopher Saint Thomas Aquinas reintroduced the idea as part of his five proofs for the existence of God. Aquinas’s first way is derived from motion. Following the same premise as Aristotle, Aquinas argues that a first mover, existing in a state of perfect actuality, must exist to move things from potential to actual states. Absence of this first mover would result in an infinite regress; therefore, the…

Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes Everything effect that occurs is a result of a cause. If a prior cause does not occur, neither will the preceding effect. Therefore,…