Comparing Pascal's Wager And The Existence Of God

Improved Essays
Pascal: Pascal’s Wager essentially revolves around the fact that betting on God’s existence is the best bet that one can make.This is because if one wagers on God’s existence and God doesn’t exist, they lose nothing. However, if he does exist, then the can potentially gain entrance into Heaven which is the ultimate reward. Therefore, betting on God’s existence is the best bet that one can possibly make. Pascal’s Wager excludes the important virtues that support Christianity and serves as a mainly self-centered principal.

Aquinas:

The First Way: Motion

Since objects can not potentially move while they are actually in motion, they can not move themselves and must be moved by something else. That “something else” is known as God.

The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes

Everything effect that occurs is a result of a cause. If a prior cause does not occur, neither will the preceding effect. Therefore,
…show more content…
Therefore, things cannot always continually exist and there was a point in time where nothing existed. If nothing existed in the past, no event could ever occur that would lead to our existence. Therefore, there is a being that does not rely on the existence of other objects. This being is God.

The Fourth Way: Argument from Gradation of Being

Things that are labeled as better or worse than other things are compared relatively to the something that is the most perfect of that certain trait. Something that possesses the most perfect qualities created the objects with lesser qualities. That thing, which is the most perfect of all objects, is God.

The Fifth Way: Argument from Design

Most objects lack intelligence, but can achieve their goals by being directed by a being that possesses a higher intelligence. Therefore, everything must be directed by a being that possesses supreme intelligence over everything else. This being is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Pascal’s Wager, he believes that we should live our lives like God exists because we have nothing to lose from it. If we believe in him and he does exist, we get to go to heaven, and if he does exist and we lived our lives like he doesn’t exist, we go to hell. Pascal thinks we have nothing to lose from believing in God but I think that is one of the things that he is wrong about. If we pretend to believe in God just in case he is real so we can go to heaven, wouldn’t God be able to tell if we were lying about it our whole lives?…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Psa/111 Week 1 Analysis

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Week One Devotional Psa 111:2 (KJV), "The works of the LORD, are great, sought out of all them that have pleasure therein." Our devotional begins with whom all things begin and that is God. Not only is God creator of all things, visible and invisible, but He is the one who holds everything together. He holds all things together as He has placed them, and they function as He has purposed them to do so. The moon, the sun, the stars, the universe, the entire solar system including the earth are all held together and consist by Him and for Him (Col 1:17 KJV).…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These arguments do come together though to form a strong case for the theistic belief in God. Dr. Mark Foreman suggests using four elements when approaching these arguments. These elements are the best explanation approach, the cumulative approach, the aspect of defeasibility, and the minimalistic concept. The best explanation approach simply implies that God is the best explanation for certain aspects of the universe. This approach is actually used often throughout science to affirm things we cannot see or touch such as electrons and black holes.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal then adds, “if you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing,” and explains why this is so. There are two options, either you believe in God or you don’t. The first option is if you believe in God and He exists, then you gain an eternity of happiness, but if you are wrong, and he doesn’t exist, you lose nothing. The second option is if you don’t believe in God and he exists, then you lose all, meaning you lose your chance at eternal life; but if he doesn’t exist, you die and lose nothing. One might try to argue that you can lose truth and knowledge if you believe in God, but Pascal explains that the comparison to what you can lose to what you can gain is so minuscule that it will be no worse than a death where you didn’t believe.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pascal Wager Beliefs

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Pascal Wager beliefs are if an individual believes in God our heavenly father, you would receive an infinitely great reward and if you did not believe in His existence, then one loses nothing. There are many different ways in which rewards and punishments can be disbursed; they might be handed out on the basis of believing in God the creator and our maker, the basis of good deeds, believing in the Heavenly Father. However, if such rewards and punishments are distributed on the basis of belief in the Christian God, then believing in the Christian God would be in our best interests. According to Wager, the choice between believing and disbelieving in God is a choice between neither losing nor gaining anything.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The best choice in this case is to believe that God does exist because it will have the greatest expect utility for oneself. Pascal believes that because of all of this we should take the risk and believe in the existence of God. The justification that Pascal uses is that we can neither prove god's existence nor know his nature because we are finite and he is infinite and we would reason about something that isn't known to us. Pascal starts off his essay by stating that, “If there is a God, He is infinitely incomprehensible……

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the contrary, by not believing in God’s existence, a person benefits by being able to engage in sin, thus eliminating the cost of believing in God. Pascal concludes by explaining that the benefits of believing in god far outweigh the cost of believing in…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal’s Wager argues that it is in the best interest to believe that God does in fact exist. Pascal’s Wager holds that if you believe in God’s existence, and follow God’s wishes, then you will inevitably go to heaven. However, if you do not believe in God’s existence you will go to hell. Pascal proposes that it is well worth it to go to church on Sunday mornings instead of sleeping in, if by simply going to church you are spared from going to hell. If you live your life believing in God, and God does exist, then you go to heaven.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cosmological argument, in it’s simplest terms, can be broken up into a few understood points that make it what some to believe the answer to God’s existence. The same form of argument that the cosmological argument possesses can actually be applied to discrediting the existence of God. The origin of time and the relationship between an infinite set of causes and effects and if it has a creator both work together in forming good points against the credibility of the cosmological argument made for the existence of God. There are two main assertions made by the argument in favor of God’s existence. The first, when laid out in simpler terms, is as follows; everything that exists must have a first cause so that means that if the universe began to exist, it must have a first cause.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will discuss how Anselm specifies God in a vague manner making it difficult to understand, at first, what he is talking about. Also, I will discuss whether or not it is possible for there to be something that is greater than God himself. In Anselm’s text, “On the Ontological Argument,” he starts by saying that something than which nothing greater can be thought could be an idea or an understanding. He explains how something than which nothing greater can be thought “cannot be nonexistent even in thought.” (132).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In true philosophical fashion, the paper will look into the critique of Thomas Hobbes to Rene Descartes’s argument for the existence of God. Descartes argues that he has the idea of the existence of an infinite, perfect and all-powerful being. In the meditations on first philosophy, Descartes presents the proves for the existence of god with the apparent evidence that I am finite and imperfect being but I have this idea of the existence of an infinite, perfect and eternal being in mind which must have been caused by something infinite and perfect. He claims that something cannot arise from nothing therefore a perfect and infinite substance must exist that is the cause of this idea and therefore perfect (god) exists. In other words, something…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The existence of God is always important in the aspect of philosophy. St. Thomas Aquinas explains what he believes is the five reasons god exists. The five reasons he believes why God exist is the Argument from Motion, Efficient Causes, Possibility and Necessity, Gradation of Being, and Design. The definition of God means that which nothing greater can be meant. St. Aquinas is a known philosopher for his discussions of the relationship between faith and the reasons, including the five reasons and proof why God existence is true, while developing Aristotelian doctrines within the church (PBF 42).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An individual who does not acknowledge God as a supreme being may think of God as a mere idea. This brings us to the idea that because God exist, he must have been the creator of mankind. God as the creator of mankind brings about the issue of whether or not this idea is completely right or wrong. The view that God created man is not necessarily wrong, but it is the desire of man for factual evidence to support this view that makes it difficult to comprehend.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays