The Argument Of Good Vs. Evil And The Existence Of God

Good Essays
The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics. He is attempting to find a reasonable answer to physics’ theory of fine-tuning. Fine-tuning is described as the extremely minute margin that allows intelligent life possible. If many things, such as gravity …show more content…
Rowe’s paper, he approaches the subject of God verses no God in a very different context. His forethought for discussing this topic is to understand the existence of evil. Is evil a reason to dispute the existence of God, or an omnipotent, benevolent being? Rowe broaches this subject in understanding the reason for suffering in the world. He states that a reason that atheism is more probable is due to the fact that any benevolent being would not allow suffering to occur unless it was for the greater good or the suffering was in place of something worse happening. Mr. Rowe argues both sides of this debate. He builds a valid argument for both atheism and theism. He shows us how a theist may dispute the atheistic viewpoint by using the G.E. Moore shift. The G.E. Moore shift tells us to deny an opposing conclusion and use it to dispute their premises. For example, a theist could deny the atheist conclusion that God does not exist, by stating that there does not exist suffering that an omniscient being could stop without allowing an evil that is worse. Therefore, this benevolent God with stop any suffering that was not for the greater good or was in place of something worse, so God does

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In this case, we cannot define this action as an evil that God creates or necessarily warrants. However, evil exists because humans have free will to choose cruelty over good. However, Mackie responds, “why could He not have made men such that they always freely choose the good?” [1;334]. Mill proposes that perhaps, God just didn’t know how. And for the same reasons, this is why God couldn’t make humans to live longer or not wear down.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, one cannot assume that suffering is good because if God allows it, it is evil. If we do, then we are assuming God is good and that suffering is good. In other words, we would be “begging the question” to continue assuming that God is good when is reality, he cannot be omnibenevolent if he does not cease the suffering of innocent children for the matter. Johnson questions the moral character of God. There are three possibilities according to Johnson: “a) God is more likely to be all evil than he is to be all good; b) God is less likely to be all evil than he to be all good; or c) God is equally likely to be all evil as he is to be all good.” Given all of the evil present in the world, there are absolutely no reasonable excuses as to why an omnibenevolent God would permit there to be evil.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Natural evil may also be called unjustified, as it cannot be justified by reason or explanation. The problem of evil is relying on the existence of natural evil. It cannot use metaphysical evil because by definition it depends on God’s existence. The evil exists simply because God exists and is perfect. It cannot use moral evil because this can be explained by the necessary existence of free will.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So positive that he confidently states: “No being who was perfect could have created a world in which there was avoidable suffering or in which his creatures would (and in fact could have been created so as not to) engage in morally evil acts, acts which very often result in injury to innocent persons.” After reading this I feel as if McCloskey is blaming the evil doing on God. We in fact know that no man is able to answer the question of why men innocent people. We however can entail that men make their own decisions. It is the ones that believe in God that repent on his mistake made, while being in an evil mind set. I can argue and say that there was an evil spirit, one not of God, that caused the evil…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Aquinas Argument Essay

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Secondly; affirming that evil is not a “thing” created by God meant that God is not omnipotent or omniscient. Some philosophers strongly believe that He is not all powerful, all-knowing or all-good for He has limited control over, and is not willing to prevent the horrific evil happening in the world. Jackson, 2014 stated that Aquinas initially explained that evil occur as a choice, it is not something intended by God to happen and so, in the context of natural evil, it cannot be said that earthquakes or volcano eruptions are chosen by the Earth or the volcano to ensue, as these God creations does not have the knowledge or the power to choose what can occur. Natural evil is not a privation of good nor is it the absence of the ultimate good that men are able to control, rather natural evil is the normal product of God’s creation (Jackson, 2014). God made eruptions and earthquakes as the nature’s normal consequence, which consequently suggests that an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God does not exists.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    God Allows Evil Essay

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A second criticism of God is based on natural evil, rather than moral evil. The definition of natural evil here is the existence of natural disasters, disease, and pain throughout the world. People claim that the universe should not contain these natural evils, and that they are indicators that the world is not perfect. Their question is “If God is perfect, why did he not create a perfect world”? Again, this is a valid argument that deserves an appropriate…

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Freewill Argument

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The ability to divert from these guides constitutes freewill. The guides themselves represent in my opinion an outline of good behavior impressment upon the world by an omnibenevolent God. That God wants the greatest good. However, to limit the degrees of freedom from which people can diverge is to limit freewill and to ultimately limit the quality of the resulting good, which I will dive into more in just a bit. The main point here is that people can choose otherwise and, thus they can choice to be evil, resulting in a world were evil…

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pascal’s Wager is an argument given to atheist and agnostics to show them why believing in God’s existence is the right choice. This argument isn't used as proof of Gods existence, it is a way to explain why it is beneficial to believe in God to maximize ones self-interest. Here is The Wager: The first is either the existence or the nonexistence of God. Reason does not decide the actual decision whether it is…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Atheism Vs Religion

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction Atheism can be defined as a belief system that negates the existence of gods. Atheists believe that there is no god. Religion on the other hand is hinged on the belief in the existence of gods who are considered to be influential in the lives of the believers. There exists the idea that eventually, atheism will become more prominent than religion and this can be attributed to various factors. This essay intends to prove the idea that atheism would eventually trump over religion.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    God does not want to be the puppeteer with humans as his puppets, thus giving humans free will. This is the reason for evil according to Augustine. “So too free will, without which no one can live rightly, must be a God-given good, and you must admit rather that those who use this good wrongly are to be condemned than that He who gave it ought not to have given it” . He argues that free will creates evil not a weak God. Natural disasters, death of a loved one, business failure, so many things are evil, and Augustine explains that the only reason any of that happens is free will .…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics