Cosmological argument

(1033-1109), who was the Catholic archbishop of Canterbury and a Doctor of the Church, first created the Ontological Argument. This is among one of the strangest arguments as well as also being one of the most debated. The ontological argument is notable due to its claim of the existence of God by basing its evidence solely on human reason and without any…

different way with his statement. In response, Evan and Manis say that the thrust of the non-temporal argument is that present existence of contingent objects requires that there be a necessary being” (Evans & Manis, 2009). As mentioned McCloskey claims that everything requires a cause for its existence; therefore God requires a cause for his existence. Evans and Manis discuss it this way, the argument assumes that all contingent beings require a cause for their existence; however, God is not a…

When it comes to the existence of God, there are many arguments. Some say that God does not exist while others try to explain how the universe was created. Saint Thomas Aquinas gives a cosmological view on whether God exists. In his article, Whether God Exists, he provides five arguments to support his view. The first article talks about motion. Just like the Myth of the Cave the prisoners used their senses to survive on a daily basis. Your senses prove that things are in motion. This shows…

In this paper, two of the most used type of philosophical arguments is further explored. The first one is known as cosmological arguments which begins by stating obvious fact that there are contingently existing things, and it ends with the conclusion that the existence of a cause with power as explanation for the existing things (Zeyl, 2005). In other words, in its simplest form cosmological argument is an attempt that tries to answer the question “why is there something rather…

In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible…

makes us believe that evolution has a designer is due to the fact of a defender who believes that God is the designer and he has realized his purpose in his designs. I would have to say that even though there is no real proof in the teleological argument that God was our designer of the universe, that as a person who believes that there is a God, we must decide for ourselves what we believe and don’t believe about the universe. Evil is something that has been in the world, going back to the…

existence of God is an ongoing argument between the atheist and the Christian. While the atheist needs undeniable proof that there is in fact an intelligent being that is causally necessary for the existence of everything on earth, Christians argue that one hundred percent certainty may not be possible. Foreman offers four ways to approach this argument: the existence of God is the best explanation for certain effects in the world, we may need to offer more than one argument in order to make…

structured arguments in defense of God to better understand how or why the universe might be reliant on a higher power, and authors, such as Brian Davies and John Hick have written about such arguments for this reason. While speaking about God, philosophers employ cosmological, design, and ontological arguments, in attempt to defend God’s existence. To begin, cosmological arguments use the existence of the world to assert the existence of God. Davies focuses on three cosmological…

of the three arguments related to the Proof for the Existence of a god, I found all three arguments to be very convincing, opinionating and interesting. These arguments appeared to be based on personal opinions, while convincing the reader to their beliefs from either a religious view, logical view or natural purpose view. The concept they all appeared to have in common was that they all believed god did exist, which I found to be very enlightening. My impression of each argument would be in…

Response Paper H. J. McCloskey is a proclaimed atheist, and in his article, “On being an Atheist” he explains his views in a unique way from the 1960’s while refuting various arguments and views held by theists. McCloskey brings up a whole pot of valid points in his arguments. However, Evans & Manis, the authors of Philosophy of Religion: Think About Faith and Holmes, the author of Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions are able to counter and bring up many points and McCloskey’s points…