Diana And Aquinas Research Paper

Improved Essays
Diana: Aquinas, I have come from the future to understand your argument in regard to God’s existence. My philosophy class sent me to figure out if your argument will help a future philosopher’s theory about meaning and purpose.
Aquinas: Well, who is this philosopher you speak of?
Diana: The philosopher is William Lane Craig.
Aquinas: I have not heard of him.
Diana: Well, of course not! He is from the future.
Aquinas: Despite this man being from the future, I am still interested in what he has to say about meaning and purpose. As a philosopher, it is always important to hear other people’s arguments. So, please, tell me what this man has to say about meaning and purpose and what this has to with God.
Diana: According to Craig, we need God
…show more content…
I will first discuss the argument of causation which deals with cause and effect. All around us we see cause and effect in the world. I can only think of three ways in which this system began. One, the universe could have caused itself. Two, the universe is an infinite chain of causes and effects. Thirdly, there was a first cause that caused the existence of the universe. (McEvoy 1) It does not make sense for the universe to cause itself and it impossible for the universe to be an infinite chain of causes and effects because the universe is not infinite series because effects are caused by something. Thus, their must be a first cause because the universe must have come from something or someone. That something or someone is God. God is the first cause that caused us and everything around us. My second argument I would like to discuss is the argument of contingency. There are two types of beings in the world: contingent ones and necessary beings. Contingent beings are like you and me. We are capable of existing and not-existing because we are born and face death. This also includes animals and other things that face life and death. The second kind of being are necessary beings. These are beings that never come into existence and never leave existence. They are always there in the universe and there was never a time when they did not exist. Now, their must be a necessary being because something cannot come from nothing. There was never a time where God did not exist and he must exist because we could not come from no

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In 1968 a philosopher named H.J. McCloskey wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist,” which attacked the main arguments held by theists. The main arguments that he refers to as “proofs” are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the ontological argument. McCloskey’s article debunks these arguments as being false and without proof. He states that theists should dismiss the idea of God entirely. He claims in his opening statements that he will show reasons why theists should be miserable just because they are theists (1).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument between journalist Carole Radziwill and former Countess LuAnn de Lesseps continues even after filming the latest season of their reality TV series. It seems that the feud will not be over soon so the followers of “The Real Housewives of New York City” or RHONY cannot help but think whether the fight between the two cast members is for real or just for reel in order to catch the attention of the public to watch the show. While chatting with fans last Aug. 12, Wednesday, Carole described someone as “nasty” and “hurtful.” She even added in her tweet that this particular woman “sleeps” with “young boys” and “married men.”…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, things cannot always continually exist and there was a point in time where nothing existed. If nothing existed in the past, no event could ever occur that would lead to our existence. Therefore, there is a being that does not rely on the existence of other objects. This being is God.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conclusion: Therefore, our universe has a cause. This…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The premises for the argument are as follows, 1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The universe didn’t just happen by chance and there is a purpose or goal. It is a causal argument and focus on modern ideas. There are several types of teleological arguments presented for Gods existence that include analogical, anthropic, and intelligent design. Just as there are arguments for the existence of God, there are also those against God. In this paper I will present a few.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before St. Thomas Aquinas gave an answer to the question whether God exists in things, he, in I.7, answered that God is limitless. The characteristic of limitless things is to exist with an unending amount everywhere in everything . Then he asks about God’s existence in things, I.8.1-4. He is trying to answer the questions: Is God in all things, Is God everywhere, Is God everywhere by essence, power, and presence, and Does it belong to God alone to be everywhere? These questions and their answers are a significant component of Aquinas’s understanding of the natural world.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Craig that he is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheist.” In this debate the same will occur for my opponent and all reading. Argument 1: Kalam Cosmological argument (KCA) (Heavily influenced by Dr. Craig’s presentation on the subject) P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause “Nihil fit ex nihilo” That is to say that nothing comes from nothing.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas hypothesised that nothing can be the cause of itself because “it would be prior to itself, which is impossible.” This is one out of three key elements of the cosmological argument that are justified to prove God: cause, motion and contingency. To further support the cosmological argument Aquinas argued that motion cannot be traced back to infinity because there must have been a first movement that began the series of movements. Aquinas argued that the first mover was God because He cannot be moved: He is an external energy.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cosmological argument, in it’s simplest terms, can be broken up into a few understood points that make it what some to believe the answer to God’s existence. The same form of argument that the cosmological argument possesses can actually be applied to discrediting the existence of God. The origin of time and the relationship between an infinite set of causes and effects and if it has a creator both work together in forming good points against the credibility of the cosmological argument made for the existence of God. There are two main assertions made by the argument in favor of God’s existence. The first, when laid out in simpler terms, is as follows; everything that exists must have a first cause so that means that if the universe began to exist, it must have a first cause.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of the universe, the argument claims, stands in need of explanation, and the only adequate explanation of its existence is that it was created by God. In simple words, cosmological argument for exsitence of god is this argument was argue that the cause of those things existence had be a “god-typed” thing, argument go all the way back to Plato and have been used by notable philosophers and thelogians ever since. Besides being philosophically evident, science finally caught up with theologians in the 20th centry when it was confirmed that universe had to have had a beginning, so today, the arguments even powerful for…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Again, Aquinas is giving us the idea again that whatever or whoever this person may be, he is the reason behind the goodness or success. “The end” which this argument is mainly discussing is when the object has a goal and it strives to obtain that goal, not through inheritance within self but through something that is giving it…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This relationship between philosophy and theology stood out drastically to how Christianity had been viewed previously because Aquinas wanted to find a way to connect Catholicism and faith with Aristotle and knowledge. One major argument in Thomas Aquinas’ “Summa Contra Gentiles that Aquinas has relating to faith and reason is that everyone is born with innate reason so everyone has the capacity to have faith. In order to unpack this assertion, one must understand how Aquinas defines faith and reason. Aquinas believes that human reason is limited and that some things transcend the power of human reason,…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays