Reasonable suspicion

discourses the number of young deaths could be dropped by 50%. The case that decided all schools need to protect their students is reasonable suspicion. I’m no politician or law representative, but I would assume reasonable suspicion should include the monitoring, by any means, of all problematic students attending ones school, isn’t that really the bases behind Reasonable Suspicion? This isn’t a hard task to accomplish, so why is it so hard to understand that human lives ought to be saved…

they must have “reasonable suspicion” meaning that based on their training and experience they should be able to determine if a person is involved in criminal activity. Once the person is stopped, the police will conduct several questions to determine his/her identity and their activities also said as their whereabouts. If the police fears for their safety they move on to the next step, to frisk the person for any weapons or other illegal contrabands. The term “reasonable suspicion” and for a…

explanation, but the officers tell him it was a part of the stop and frisk law. However, according to the Fourth Amendment, the stop and frisk law granted officers the right to stop and frisk an individual based on reasonable suspicion.” By law, the officer must have reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed by the suspect. If the officer reasonably suspects that the suspect is armed and dangerous, the police may frisk the suspect, meaning that the…

Racial profiling is what police officers use to target people such as the use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense. Crime rates are racially disproportionate. Young African American males are often more likely than other age and racial groups to commit drug related crimes. Hispanics are more likely than other ethnic groups to have violated immigration laws (1). Racial profiling sometimes can seem to work. Since the New York Police Department…

In particular the question arises if it is a violation of “Stop and Frisk” under the Fourth Amendment based on the suspicions of the officer at the time of the immediate contact with the petitioner. The issue specifically refers to whether the officer in this case had the right to “Stop and Frisk” the subject without probable cause based on the observations of the officer…

and Bell was the result of an ongoing investigation. Det. Martin stated that he believed he witnessed the sale of narcotics during his investigation of the anonymous drug tip, the police may detain a person for investigative purposes if their are reasonable grounds to suspect the individual…

warrantless searches of students, however they do need reasonable suspicion. “White answered by distinguishing the situation. ‘It is evident,’ he wrote, ‘that the school setting requires some easing of the restrictions to which searches by public authorities are ordinarily subject.’ As such, a warrant is not required to search a student, nor is ‘probable cause’ required” (Iannacci 2016). Though, a school official does need reasonable suspicion in order to conduct a search; this is less than…

used to promote mandated reporting of child abuse in state laws vary by state but initially mean “reasonable suspicion” and, although an ambiguous term, it is purposely kept this way to promote reporting. The ambiguity of mandated reporting terms seem to be the cause of underreporting of child abuse because physicians are not able to accurately interpret the meaning of terms such as “reasonable suspicion” (Flaherty, 2006).…

police officer, acting on suspicion that Terry was planning to commit a robbery, detained him and patted him down. Terry and his lawyers claimed that his constitutional rights against unreasonable search and seizure were violated because the police officer did not have a warrant for the search. Once this case reached the Supreme Court, the ruling stated that a police officer does not need a warrant to conduct a search of an individual. Officers only need a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. The…

1. Define enemy combatant. Provide examples of who might be deemed as such and why? Enemy combatants are persons detained under the executive order established by former president of the United States, George W. Bush. It also includes the definition of an individual who was part of or supporting Taliban or al Qaeda forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United states or its coalition partners. One example of someone who may be deemed as such is a…