International humanitarian law

dodge the issue in the international criminal law and for a genuine international criminal law to emerge which goes beyond the sovereignty of individual states. The basic meaning of International Humanitarian Law is derived from the idea of rules that seek to limit the effect of armed conflict, for humanitarian reasons. It seeks to protect people who are not participants in the hostilities and also restricts the means and methods of warfare. International humanitarian law is also known as ‘The law of war or the law of armed conflict’. It is the law which regulates the conduct of armed conflicts. IHL is inspired by considerations of humanity and the mitigation of human suffering. It comprises a set…

In order to understand the relationship between international humanitarian law and international human rights law, the foundation, development and overall intention of these separate sets of laws must be explored. International Humanitarian Law or IHL, is a set of international rules that has been established by treaties or customs for the intention of solving the humanitarian problems that arise directly from international or non-international armed conflicts. This universal body of law began…

knowing the consequences that goes along with it. These drones have been used without congress approval. Also, after the World Trade Center was attacked, President Bush signed a Memorandum of Notification creating a secret list of “High Value Targets” that the CIA was authorized to kill anywhere in the world without further presidential approval. Apparently, the CIA needs to be wiser when they have to go against terrorists, extremists or militants. The United States has to find another way to…

these pilotless aerial vehicles provide military personnel with the ability to conduct reconnaissance easily and continuously and to carry out lethal attacks with improved precision. In this regard, drones are today used by US led international coalition against terrorism purposely for targeting and…

There is footage that shows how a predator drone “vaporizes” people who appear to be crossing the border. In the video, we see what appear to be three people, walking alongside a fence, when suddenly, there is smoke similar to that of a nuclear bomb and these three innocent people completely vanish. In the Middle East, for example, drones have killed many innocent people—including babies. However, the government and militaries main targets are those who are believed to be terrorists. “Believed”…

Other perspectives, especially the political cases from the Middle Eastern nations, do not advocate for drones, as drone strikes may cause unintended collateral damage to this area of attack. For example, drones carry inherent political costs to nations, such as Yemen, Pakistan, Iran, and even Afghanistan. According to an article written by respected journalist Joshua Foust on the political consequences of drone strikes, domestic populations in the area of attack perceive drones as “almost…

Drones are a violation certain laws like International Covenant on civil and Political Rights. There are no good outcomes from drone strikes the civilians are afraid of drones they are afraid of if the drone will kill them or not. When family is apart of collateral damage that's what causes people to be motivated to join the terrorist against the americans and their ideals. Drones strikes and drones don’t help people feel any safer and are the true terrorist against civilians. How the CIA…

The United states should continue their use of drone strikes because terrorist have been attacking our nation.Not only have the terrorist have been attacking the nation,but also the people with -in the United States.We are just doing everything we can to protect our people of our nation. One reason that we are doing the drone strikes is because the United States are trying to protect the people from the terrorist so we must fight back.According to Jarret .T Crawford ,Shaun Wiley and Nina…

million. It is clear that it is a win-win situation for drones. Drones save money and lives. How? Military troops cost more and drones don’t put any soldiers in life-threatening situations. Their last point is that drones conserve lives. Drones save lives in a few ways. It decimates terrorists which decreases chances in terrorist attacks. Drone attacks in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia have killed upwards of 3,500 militants, including dozens of high-level commanders implicated in…

of service the United States Drone Program has racked up more than 2,400 confirmed kills. In many cases these drones aren’t as perfect as they seem, they do have limited abilities, some believe they are counterproductive and destabilizing, and that these drones can be easily taken over by the enemy if shot down. There have also been many reports of increased PTSD with the drone pilots, when flying these UAVs it can feel much like a video game with good graphics and drone pilots have had trouble…