Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

Drones strikes don’t have any good outcomes on the war on terrorism all they do is cause problems. Drones are a violation certain laws like International Covenant on civil and Political Rights. There are no good outcomes from drone strikes the civilians are afraid of drones they are afraid of if the drone will kill them or not. When family is apart of collateral damage that's what causes people to be motivated to join the terrorist against the americans and their ideals. Drones strikes and drones don’t help people feel any safer and are the true terrorist against civilians. How the CIA and JSOC use drones aren't a legal way to use the drones and are a violation against Human and political rights. Drones are a violation to International Covenant and Political rights by killing people suspected to be a terrorist. “According to top secret intelligence reports reviewed by …show more content…
Despite the administration guarantees of the accuracy of the CIA targeting intelligence. The CIA and JSOC target extremist and other militants, but do not publicly reveal whether those killed are actively involved in terrorism against the United States” (Source K). When drone strikes are sent by the CIA or JSOC operators kill people who are suspect as a terrorist. If a drone is sent to kill someone and they don’t know if they are a terrorist or not they can’t do anything and they don’t tell anyone. The CIA aren’t supposed to suspect someone as a terrorist unless they are a potential threat against the United states. Drones are illegal to use according to International Covenant on civil and political rights. “Simply being suspected of some connection to a “militant’ organization or under CIA policy of “signature” drone striking fitting the profile of a terrorist in an area where terrorists is not sufficient to make someone a permissible target for killing Article of the