Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination

1954, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision regarding discrimination in the school system known as, Brown v Board of Education (Keck, 2009). Immediately following this decision, backlash erupted in the Southern states. Some reactions were beneficial for the civil rights activists and helped them move forward, but similar to what we are seeing today with the LGBTQ community, some reactions were detrimental to the group and caused more harm than good. In June of 2015, the Supreme Court made…

amendment right to unreasonable seizures. The federal districted court denied his motion; therefore, the evidence was not suppressed. As a result of that decision Rodriguez entered a conditional guilty plea and was given a five year prison sentence. Rodriguez filed an appeal, but the United States appellate court for the eight circuit affirmed. The court held that the brief delay was acceptable when compared to other previous…

Section 4. Which government governs the public school As state, and federal officers governed for the state 's interests, the performance as the sovereign authority of the state is to prevent violation of civil rights of individuals. Procedural due process under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment guarantees certain bureaucratic rights to entities who are view as being disadvantaged of life, liberty, or property by federal, state, or local government (Coggburn, & Kearney, 2011), When…

all their applications are moved to the bottom of the adult application list. The respondents ask the federal district court in the United States and the district court asks the Board to keep their children’s original visa filing dates, rather than the date where they view their applications. The Board denied the request. Later, the respondents appealed the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Where they argue about the Child Status Protection Act and this act stated that…

took place. Gideon vs. Wainwright that took place in 1963 was a case fought between Clarence Earl Gideon and Louie L. Wainwright, a judge and member of the Supreme Court. Gideon was charged with breaking into Bay Harbor Pool Room in Panama City, Florida and entering with intent to commit petty larceny, a crime where someone steals someone else’s property. In court, Gideon asked for someone to represent him. The courts denied him a lawyer informing him that since he wasn’t being charged with a…

Without it where would we be today in life if it was not for you? What would the outcome be of violence? How would we resolve situations dealing with the government? Does it even bring peace in today’s society? Would we still be allowed to voice our opinions or how we feel? I thank you for the Constitution. What is the constitution? Is the government still allowed to make decisions based on the constitution? Is the constitution keeping the Americans stable? I found myself asking myself these…

The United States Supreme Court has been a topic of controversy on several cases, during the last several decades in our country. If we look back in time, history shows us that the US Supreme Court has made several big mistakes in the ways they handled several federal court rulings. In the year 1944, just briefly after the battles and war between the United States and Japan, the Supreme Court ruled a law that would be considered immoral, and racial profiling in the present time. The Korematsu v…

process or collide with the rights of others” (McCarthy et al., 2014, p. 98). The Supreme Court applies the First Amendment in many cases regarding free speech. Through these various cases, the Supreme Court has established four legal principles to guide student expression rights in public educational facilities (McCarthy et al., 2014, p. 95). The first decision on student expression rights heard by the Supreme Court was in 1969, in the Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District. The…

Howard and treated his symptoms. He was screened and subsequently admitted to the hospital. The court did not find the defendant in violation of EMTALA. The plaintiff party appealed the decision. In the appellate decision, the courts ruled for the Plaintiff, declaring that EMTALA requires a hospital to treat a patient with an emergency condition in such a way that, at the time of the patient's release, no further…

so, the court can command the witness to produce the relevant articles which might enlighten the judge or jury over the case. These relevant articles may be documents, papers, articles, record, exhibits, microscopic slides, test results etc. EVIDENCES PRESENTED The evidences presented by the expert witnesses are Exculpatory evidence, Inculpatory evidence and Demonstrative evidence. An Expert Evidence is Fact Evidence not Hearsay Evidence. Hearsay Evidence is not acceptable in the court of Law.…