As state, and federal officers governed for the state 's interests, the performance as the sovereign authority of the state is to prevent violation of civil rights of individuals. Procedural due process under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment guarantees certain bureaucratic rights to entities who are view as being disadvantaged of life, liberty, or property by federal, state, or local government (Coggburn, & Kearney, 2011), When determining what are deemed as civil violation of civil liberties; procedure warrants three balance factors:
1) The individual’s welfares at stake. 2) the risk techniques used, if any, will result in inaccurate decision, and the significance of additional procedures …show more content…
The disagreement over the Protestant Bible provoked social unrest, political campaign subjected, a proposed constitutional Fourteenth Amendment and societies gathered in efforts to attack school employees and its administration in a mob violence mentality (Laycock, 2013). In 1844, Mobs gathered and the worst rioting occurrence took place for five days in Philadelphia (Laycock, 2013). Protestant and Catholic mobs fought, a Catholic church was pulverized as it plummet to the ground, at least twenty people were killed, and two thousand territorial armies occupied the city (Laycock, 2013). With the unrest with the city, school organizational regulations remained the same and Bible reading in the common schools continued without change (Laycock, 2013). Under equal rights religious liberalism was deemed to have no place in the public school system, daily monologue force to be recited daily was ruled unconstitutional, and the effect was to removal legal expressions, organized prayer, and Bible reading was removed from within the public schools. The expectation, of prayer within the public school was therefore deemed …show more content…
Under equal protection with the public sector strict scrutiny is the most intense and the exacting form of judicial review; the landmark case of United States v. Paradise 1987, supports the under strict scrutiny review as affirmative action as the action may be viable concerning resolution of past woes and proven issue administered to individuals of minority (Coggburn, & Kearney, 2011), (Aronson, 2007, p. 1455). On the other hand, make a number of other important decisions that occur behind closed doors which do not get publish to the jurors, public or judge which are not subjected to such intense public scrutiny, such as charging and sentencing decisions. Because of a wide range of media recognition, a case receives an enormous pressure to charge a suspect with a crime and seek a long sentence, due to the likely positive public response (Aronson, 2007, p. 1455). The U.S. Constitution use of governance concerning the public administration organization are of direct sharing between what are negotiated as jurisdiction and governmental agency are held to a different sort of