Biblical judges

The individuals and organizations who decide to file an amicus brief must adhere to the specific regulations and guidelines, which are set by the United States Supreme Court. To file an amicus brief, the interested individual and or group must previously receive permission of all parties involved in the case, which is being heard. Although, “the United States SolicitorGeneral, government agencies, and local or state governments do not have to seek permission to file” an amicus brief (Salzman;…

The AGCO is governed by Alcohol and Gaming Regulation and Public Protection Act, 1996; Gaming Control Act, 1992; Liquor License Act; Wine Content and Labeling Act, 2000; and the Liquor Control Act sec. 3(1) b,e,f,g and 3(2)a. The AGCO deals with several matters such as alcohol hearings and appeals, gaming hearings and appeals, horse racing hearing and appeals, public interest hearings, and arbitration of lottery disputes. If the hearing/appeal is about matters that deal with alcohol, then it is…

The Purpose Behind “Twelve Angry Men” The purpose behind the play “Twelve Angry Men” is to address the realities of what happens on a jury behind closed doors. The author, Reginald Rose, wants readers and viewers to realize being on a jury is not easy and requires careful thinking throughout the decision-making process. Each jury member represents the types of people that serve on an actual jury. Rose does not want to sugar coat the true actions that occur when serving along with strangers.…

1. This appeal was critical of both the crown counsel and the trial judge in this case because of the credibility during the trial became an issue. Even though some objection was taken, crown counsel did not warn the jury, and gave instruction to neutralize the impropriety. Also, the cross-examination of the appellant was not fair and improper. Therefore, the appellant brought up four grounds of appeal, and the first ground of appeal was granted under the remedy. The first ground was that the…

The final argument that was presented was that the plaintiff has to prove that there was intent to discriminate in order to establish an equal protection violation. Under this argument the respondents claim that the courts have consistently ruled that intent must be established in order to back up any claims of violations. They claimed that previous courts have conceded that “the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal laws but not equal results” . They argued that the plaintiff has failed to…

were families of the defendant. The courtroom could be an intimidating and uneasy place to be in for most people unless you're a lawyer or other members of the courthouse. As we all know courts and courtrooms are a place of power, being that the judge has the last to said along with the…

levels of law enforcement to include local, state and federal agencies. If a person is arrested by a police officer for breaking the law they will be tried in the court system. The court system is comprised of prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges. The prosecutor who is a representative of the state and will review the evidence to see if an individual has broken the law. They have…

An analysis of the reasons for the judges decisions in each of the hearings including the basis on which liability was established or dismissed and the role of the persuasive precedent. Refer to two of the cases used in each hearing and how the judges used these. In the first hearing the judge chose to dismiss the liability factor as they believed the school could not do anymore to prevent a one off incident such as this. One of the precedent cases used was; Romel El-Sheik v. Australian Capital…

Whether you're involved in a family law dispute or civil litigation, the shape of your life can hinge on the outcome of your trial. Legal proceedings are highly stressful and confusing to those with limited experience, which is why having an experienced attorney guide you through is crucial for ensuing the best possible outcome of your case. For your own peace of mind, Malcolm Stewart Douglas Attorney At Law, handling civil and criminal law cases throughout Ashtabula county, recommends asking…

he doctrine of piercing the corporate veil is not subject to any bright line tests. Courts have struggled for years to develop and refine their analysis of these claims. However, each new action brings a different set of facts and circumstances into the equation and a separate determination must be made as to whether the plaintiff has adduced sufficient evidence of control and domination, improper purpose, or use and resulting damage. The decision whether to pierce the corporate veil may be…