Law-Breaking as Protest Essay

defined as purposely transgressing the law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. It is also a way for people to protest against laws that should be changed. Although they may not impact our free society, others see fit to change it. In my opinion, I believe peaceful resistance to laws impact our free society. Let's take a moment to realize that civil disobedience is a way to protest without breaking the law. There are great civil rights activist…

avoided if everyone would just learn to respect one another. For example, instead of being rude to law enforcement and being disrespectful, just simply do as they ask. For example, Jeremy Brown wrote in his article “Polite to Police”, “A bad attitude will make even the most forgiving officer start to see how many violations can be found.” Also, people should protest peacefully instead of burning cars, breaking windows, and destroying other people’s belongings. Lastly, children are being bullied…

the world an effective method of protest that has allowed significant change to occur without war or mass bloodshed. What used to take a war to resolve can now be accomplished with a mass protest where the voices of those who are discontented can be heard. Some however, would argue that civil disobedience is detrimental to society, as it is technically breaking the law. However, these people neglect to understand that we, as Americans have a right to break the laws that impose…

Imagine, fires flaming, outside of homes, bullets breaking through the air, and riots roaring up and down city streets. The United States of America turned upside down because First Amendment restrictions ceased to exist. Regulations including time, place, and manner, keep our country from causing absolute chaos. In America, time, place, and manner are three key elements to success as a culture. Most of everything accepted in society is done in a specific time, place, and mode, even the way we…

"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so,” said by Thomas Jefferson. According to dictionary.com civil disobedience is, “the refusal to obey certain laws or governmental demands for the purpose of influencing legislation or government policy, characterized by the employment of such nonviolent techniques as boycotting,picketing, and nonpayment of taxes.” So, basically it means that a citizen refuses to follow laws that they don’t believe in or that they…

According to History.com, the Bill of Rights is the symbol of what lies at the heart of American idea of individual liberty, limited government, and the rule of law. The Bill of Rights was created to protect the citizens but was not considered important until supporters of the Constitution saw it was pivotal to ratify it. James Madison, the fourth president, was able to make the Bill of Rights officially became part of the Constitution in December 1791 (2009). With the Bill of Rights in place…

effort. He says unjust law is out of harmony with the moral law, however a just law is manmade law that square with moral law Kant agrees to this ideas too. According to King breaking an unjust law is not considered wrong. We have freedom of birthright which means that we are born as free. From it we are given free right to fight when something is wrong. I think college increasing their tuition every year is not fair. People have being questioning and have done small protest for it.Now the…

have been many laws that have not treated everyone fairly. In order to impact a free society, many had to undergo civil disobedience in order to impact the free society that we live in today. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. Without civil disobedience, it would have been almost impossible to make change in our society. In 1846, Henry David Thoreau refused to pay taxes as a way to show his opposition to slavery. Thoreau was intentionally breaking the law without any…

your period or a deep secret? I know how I feel about it but in some cases I have an understanding about it. The federal, state, and local governments do not have the right to monitor our social media; not only because it is against the law but can cause protests and chaos. We are protected by the fourth amendment and this is why the government is not allowed to invade our privacy. We are also protected by the first amendment because it allows us to speak how we please as long as not doing it in…

diffuse protests. However, is it an effective way? While it is quite common for police brutality to be enacted in order to stop protesters, it is neither a safe solution nor a permanent one. Protesting is one of the most basic rights of citizenship. Therefore, stopping a protest before it happens is not the answer, but stopping it before it gets dangerous. Finding a secure and effective way to defuse a violent crowd is imminent as to ensure the safety of everyone. Revolts and protests are not…