With the ever-growing inflation of goods and capital affecting the global economy of the world, a decade long pattern of studies shows that college fee has increased more drastically than almost any other inflations ever since its commencement. Right to education, a universal entitlement to education, needless to say is of dire importance in today’s modern world, but whether everybody has the privilege of this fundamental right is the today’s concern. Often cited as the career defining path, college education is not accessible to everybody and this in long run comes to determine the progress and prosperity of a country. Therefore, politicians have always raised concern towards the notion of free college with Barack Obama’s voice for possibility
…show more content…
The government has to take the responsibility at state or federal level so as to provide free education. By providing free education to the public, the government can earn the respect of the public which contributes to the sound prestige and development of the country. But the control of colleges can entail unprecedented expansion of federal power over public which is not always good. The expenditure for free college means that the federal power can impose more taxes on other things as the means of revenue so as to make up for the expenditure for free college. Thus, even though free college may earn the respect of the public towards the government, it does however tarnish the image of the government thanks to the increased imposed taxes in other areas. Reflecting the income gap of the poor and the rich, free college can provide opportunities for the poor to narrow the income gap who would not otherwise be able to do so. But it can be controversial considering if the use of the free college is efficient or not. The fact that most college students already come from disproportionately well-off backgrounds means that all the funds allocated for free college may well have been pouring into the pockets of the already rich families. Limited seats for college mean that the free education meant for the relatively poor students may be received by the ones who can already afford the cost while
The government has to take the responsibility at state or federal level so as to provide free education. By providing free education to the public, the government can earn the respect of the public which contributes to the sound prestige and development of the country. But the control of colleges can entail unprecedented expansion of federal power over public which is not always good. The expenditure for free college means that the federal power can impose more taxes on other things as the means of revenue so as to make up for the expenditure for free college. Thus, even though free college may earn the respect of the public towards the government, it does however tarnish the image of the government thanks to the increased imposed taxes in other areas. Reflecting the income gap of the poor and the rich, free college can provide opportunities for the poor to narrow the income gap who would not otherwise be able to do so. But it can be controversial considering if the use of the free college is efficient or not. The fact that most college students already come from disproportionately well-off backgrounds means that all the funds allocated for free college may well have been pouring into the pockets of the already rich families. Limited seats for college mean that the free education meant for the relatively poor students may be received by the ones who can already afford the cost while