Biomedica Trull Animal Testing Essay

As he backed himself into the corner of the cage, fear penetrated the little guinea pig’s eyes while he watched the man carrying a scary needle closer to him. Now imagine that little guinea pig being your pet. Being a pet owner, you can tell when your pet is sad, happy, or not acting like themselves. Thinking about that, I picture my guinea pig in a scary room with strangers who continuously do tests on him and that is truly terrifying. There are many questions about animal testing. Is it right? Is it wrong? If major companies have been doing it for years, it can’t be that bad. Little does anyone realize, there is another way we could conduct tests that do not harm animals in the slightest. No animals should be tested on because although a few studies have shown to help humans, the tests are very harmful to animals when there are other ways to test products. Should animals be used for …show more content…
Using scientific data from tests that the physicians and scientists at numerous universities have conducted, you are able to determine how a product would work on an actual person. This article appeared in the Wall Street Journal, so her audience consists of those reading for business and financial news. In Trull’s case, this is considered business news because it focuses around business’s that test on animals. Trull pushes to raise awareness about all the success that testing on animals has had. Trull is a Biomedical researcher, so it is understandable that her viewpoint would be for animal testing in order to find cures. She mainly took a very biased side when writing because she was not worried about the harm it would cause the animal, but only the outcome of the harm being done. Trull’s approach leaned more towards the appeal of logos. She used specific data revolving around testing on animals that proved successful when then used on