Frankie Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
xWarner Marquez
December 3
Mr.Jackson
ERWC
12 Grade
Animal Testing In the article “Animal Testing and Its Gifts to Humans” Frankie Trull claims through pathos that the use of animal research is a necessity for the creation of new treatments. Trull opens by saying that animal research has provided another new treatment that is saving lives. He highlights that there is a new treatment in result of animal testing and opens his argument in contest of this treatment to establish a form of pathos. Through medical research animal models are indispensable and play a key role in creating treatments. Trull highlights another major breakthrough cure for Ebola that
…show more content…
One doctor, by the name of Jonas Salk set out to rid the world of polio and other viral diseases. Instead of working with patients, he set out to formulate a cure in the lab. At the cost of thousands of animal experimentations, we have rid the world of one of the worst epidemics in the history of the world, thanks to Jonas Salk.

Polio was not the only disease wiped out. Flu vaccinations were created and cures for smallpox came from animal testing. Therapeutic usage of many antibiotics, including penicillin,was conducted on animals. In medicine we owe much to these creatures. In the future, animals will be needed to test newer and more advanced viruses that have the potential to cause deadly diseases.

I believe that in order to keep saving thousands of lives each year, we need to continue with animal testing. I do not necessarily agree with animal cruelty, but I do believe that animals are needed in order to keep creating ground breaking treatments. If an anti-animal testing activist got sick with Ebola and wanted to get treatment, I know they would not reject the treatment that has been created by the use of animal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Each year, thousands of animals are euthanized due to animal research. Many individuals may argue that scientist are putting the lives of animals in danger by testing on them, however, is animal lives valued human lives? By showing emotion there may be some guilt for harming the lives of animals, although puzzling over the percentage of human lives are saved from animal testing doing all the research worthwhile. Should animal testing be banned in America? “Arguments against Animal Testing” by Natasha was written for the general audience who are interested in articles about animal testing.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maybe one day technology will have advanced so far as to render animal testing unnecessary, which would be ideal, but that day is simply not today. However we must not be wanton or ruthless in our testing of animals, just as animal test subjects are necessary so are the ethical and moral policies that regulate animal testing. Scientific advancement should never rely on what is blatantly cruel and scientists should always strive to do as little harm or cause as little distress as possible to their test subjects. Animal testing can lead to great advancements in medical technology and it is our job to make sure that we take the comfort and well being of the animals being tested into account. After all, to anthropomorphize for a moment, isn’t that the least we can do for the beings who are helping us treat all the diseases we are susceptible…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year, more than 100 million animals are being tested with products to help cure an illness, or are helping to better the life of humans. If these products work, then it is a success, but if they do not work it hurts the animal’s and it puts them in danger. Many may say it is a good thing because the products are being tested before handing them to a human. Animal testing is that it is wrong and dangerous and especially for the safety of medications for human consumption.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are you surprised by anything that is said on the website? Why do you think many people are so quick to believe reported statistics? While on the website and reading the article, few things stood out to me. Like many, I was aware of the animal testing epidemic as well as the arguments made by critics and anti-animal testing groups who are opposed to it.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Cruel

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Noël Merino in the article, “Medical Testing on Animals Is Cruel and Unnecessary” argues that animal testing is cruel and it does not benefit humans as much as society may think it does. Merino supports his argument by describing a summary of the process of animal research and how little it does for humans and how much it actually hurts animals. The author’s purpose is to show that humans do not fully understand what happens in the laboratories so that they don’t completely understand how demeaning it is to research on animals. The author writes in a formal tone to the audience.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is among one of the most controversial issues worldwide. Animal testing can lead to many great discoveries in our constant evolving world, but can also endanger the lives of innocent creatures. Through many arguments, animal testing puts the life of animals at risk in order to try to make advancements in the medical, cosmetic, and scientific fields. The first animal testing began in the 17th century on numerous animals to demonstrate blood circulation. Animal testing expanded quickly and in 1876 parliament passed the Cruelty to Animal Acts in Europe.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only way I can think of that people can justify the use of animals in testing is because of how it helps human. But that’s just not the case anymore. In March 2006, six human volunteers were injected with a drug that had been cleared in rats, rabbits, mice and monkeys with no effects. And within minutes the volunteers were withering on the floor with agony. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/aysha-akhtar/animal- experiments_b_4209541.html) “elephant man trial”…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With America choosing to throw out products tested on animals, the question people must ask themselves is, is animal testing really that bad? Arguing that rats who were born in laboratories and raised to be tested on is wrong, it makes people wonder if it really is bad. Animals are very similar to humans and resemble them outstandingly. With critters slowly becoming a widely talked about source in the world, communities have begun a debate about what side to be on. “My own experience of over 60 years in biomedical research amply demonstrated that without the use of animals and of human beings, it would have been impossible to acquire the important knowledge needed to prevent much suffering and premature death not only among humans but also among [other] animals.” said Albert Sabin, who was a Polish American medical researcher, best known for developing the oral polio vaccine which has played a key role in nearly eradicating the disease.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a world without vaccines. What starts as a small cough can grow into something much worse, and without the proper medicine to treat our infections and illnesses, we can land ourselves in an early grave. Because of the discoveries made by scientists with the help of animal testing, we’ve gained access to many different kinds of medicine and antibiotics. Animal testing has been used for years to improve our lives, but many people believe it is cruel and inhumane. These people are commonly known as animal rights activists, but they’ve also been called antivivisectionists.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many don’t know that the animals they are testing on are very healthy; they get most of their animals from people who breed them. Everything in the medical field being used today is from animal testing. Antibiotics were never used 100 years ago, because when they tried to fix the problem it was on the spot for humans. They can now use it as…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal testing has been used for centuries to provide trial runs for medication and procedures. Cosmetic companies have also started to use animals to test their products. This has brought a lot of backlash onto the topic animal testing. However, what they seem to forget is the fact that animal testing in the advancement in human health. Therefore, animal testing should be continued.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cassidy Walton Professor Marek English 1101 Sec. 54AZ 6 June 2018 Annotated Bibliography: Animal Testing Animal testing is one of the most frowned upon scientific experiments around, but the whole world needs this testing to save the human race. There are causes and effects just like any other scientific experiments. The testing of animals helps the human race better understand the way animals react to the cures, and to help find cures for the diseases.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of animals in research is widely accepted, particularly within the scientific community. However, with the rise of new technologies and growing concern over animal welfare, the ethics of animal experimentation and the extent to which it is practiced has increasingly come into question. Although animal experimentation is regulated to prevent excessive suffering, opponents argue that these measures are insufficient. Proponents of animal research argue that knowledge gained from it and the various applications for it justify the unethical manner by which that knowledge is obtained. This argument neglects critical moral considerations rooted in deontology and utilitarianism which condemn the unethical use of animals for the advancement…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays