The Dangers Of Animal Testing For Cosmetic Morality

1600 Words 7 Pages
Over the last several decades the topic of animal testing for cosmetic purposes has taken the world by surprise. The throngs of questions concerning this matter have skyrocketed, yet how often are these concerns addressed? For that matter, how many citizens even understand what cosmetic animal testing entails? As defined by Humane Society International, “the term ‘animal testing’ refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology” (About Animal Testing). These procedures typically result in pain, physiological distress, and in extreme cases, death. Animal testing for the sole purpose of cosmetics is an unnecessary worldwide problem which fundamentally tortures animals in order to achieve a goal which could be obtained through more humane circumstances.
Morality is a distinct role the conscious mind plays on one in order to determine right or wrong. Yet, when it comes to the difficult matters like as to whether animals have fundamental rights, it seems
…show more content…
After all, there is a major difference between humans and animals (Mone, 20). Different species simply react differently to certain substances. A Newkirk once said, “A rat is not a little man” (151). For example, parsley is poisonous to many birds and penicillin is deadly to guinea pigs (Newkirk, 152). Bin wrote in his article on animal testing, “There are increasing concerns that such an approach…may not provide sufficient information to adequately protect human health” (A264). Judging certain side effects on animals is often impossible as well. Scientists frequently overlook nausea, headache, and impaired vision in rodents because they are so difficult to pick up on (Newkirk, 152). Aside from less than accurate results, animal testing also takes a substantial amount of time and costs millions of dollars to carry out (Mone,

Related Documents