Alexandra Sedgwick Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Starting off an essay with four different sickening cases of animal abuse from animal testing definitely catches an audience's attention. In the article, Calls to Stop Testing on Animals at Universities, kittens, monkeys, dogs, and rats were all tested and abused at Australian Universities. All four cases had occurred in the last year with the goal to make medical and scientific advancements. Although the testing does not break any laws, the animals endured a great amount of pain from the tests. Alexandra Sedgwick was one person that noticed the testing and took a stance. The Deakin University student’s main goal is to end animal cruelty. Her proposal, that got support from PETA, was to use digital software and human simulators for testing. Alexandra is taking action by leading a protest, and PETA is sponsoring some software for her school. Sedgwick is an animal lover and wants to see Australia follow in the United States footsteps and stop using animals for learning surgical skills. …show more content…
The author does a nice job of collecting information from various sources like the universities, PETA, and Humane Research Australia. There are quotes from Alexandra Sedgwick, the girl responsible for the protest. The information all adds up and seems reliable because of the detailed information and all the people referenced in the article. This article shines the light on the efforts to ending animal testing, but the article is not biased. Although there is descriptive results of brutal cases caused by animal testing in the beginning, all four were horror situations that were real. The author simply informed the audience with out her opinion added in. The goal was to inform people of the testing done in Australia and how people are trying to make a difference and stop animal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Goodall’s essay is much more convincing because it is much more different to argue against her statements than it is to argue against Sabin’s conclusion. Goodwill’s argumentative persuasive essay is well-formed because she attempts to understand both extremes of the dilemma, does not see the issue in black and white, personifies animals, mentions alternatives to animal testing, uses all-inclusive terminology and calls for an open discussion. On the other hand, Sabin’s argument is weaker, and her statements are easier to argue against because she does not consider the other extreme, lumps organizations together and tries too hard to humanize her husband, which shows extreme bias. She outright demonizes those who oppose animal testing and indirectly blames them of being ignorant. Sabin’s argument would have been stronger if she stated some reasons why animal testing is considered inhumane and provided some ethical, logical and emotional appeal to debunk those reasons in a mature and appropriate…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although some topics may be considered controversial, they need to be talked about. This is true with the subject of animal testing. In an article published in the New York Times, "Second Thoughts of an Animal Researcher", author John P. Gluck informs the reader why a scientist, who formerly conducted experiments on monkeys, would change his views to be against the practice of animal experimentation. He does this by using personal experiences. In another article, "Animal Research is Wasteful and Misleading", authors Neal D. Barnard and Stephen R. Kaufman use scientific data and evidence to make a logical case against animal testing.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, the co-authors of the essay “The Evil of Animal “Rights”’ elucidate that, animal rights activists are terrorists who use violence to get their requests accepted by different entities. Epstein and Brook, who are for animal testing belief that, using animals for testing is very vital when conducting research for possible cures of terminal diseases like cancer and AIDS. However, they do not seem to get their way…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each year, thousands of animals are euthanized due to animal research. Many individuals may argue that scientist are putting the lives of animals in danger by testing on them, however, is animal lives valued human lives? By showing emotion there may be some guilt for harming the lives of animals, although puzzling over the percentage of human lives are saved from animal testing doing all the research worthwhile. Should animal testing be banned in America? “Arguments against Animal Testing” by Natasha was written for the general audience who are interested in articles about animal testing.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal welfare states the laws and regulations needed to follow to ensure a safe and ethical lab experiment on animals. It also argues the point that animals have absolutely no right or say in what is going on with them nor are they subject to any court trials on behalf of their abuse. This extremely opinionated source lists the many reason to be against animal testing and the unjust treatment they are getting. The purpose of this book is to state and explain the laws animal testing is “sliding under” and to help the reader understand the laws that are already existing to prevent such hearsh conditions.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are you surprised by anything that is said on the website? Why do you think many people are so quick to believe reported statistics? While on the website and reading the article, few things stood out to me. Like many, I was aware of the animal testing epidemic as well as the arguments made by critics and anti-animal testing groups who are opposed to it.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Using scientific data from tests that the physicians and scientists at numerous universities have conducted, you are able to determine how a product would work on an actual person. This article appeared in the Wall Street Journal, so her audience consists of those reading for business and financial news. In Trull’s case, this is considered business news because it focuses around business’s that test on animals. Trull pushes to raise awareness about all the success that testing on animals has had. Trull is a Biomedical researcher, so it is understandable that her viewpoint would be for animal testing in order to find cures.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Satire On Animal Testing

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Millions of animals around the world being abused causing them pain, depression, and anxiety. They spend all of their lives inside in small cages with minimum room; they're confused, scared and very lonely and aren’t able to interact with other animals, and aren’t able to defend themselves. Many different types of species have to suffer everyday because of animal testing. Animal testing shouldn’t be allowed considering it is abusive, ethical wrong, and not beneficial for humans or animals. Animals bodies are very different from humans.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Researchers should observe firsthand any suffering they cause, so that they can better balance the benefit (or hoped-for benefit) to humanity against the cost in suffering to the animal”(Goodall 671). I agree with her claim, because it is rational. She realizes that animal testing does benefit humans with education, biomedical and behavioral research, and drug and product testing; all she asks is that everyone involved with animal testing should have to witness, be knowledgeable, and try to find a balance between benefit and the cost in suffering to the animal. The author uses pathos including: anecdotes, loaded language, and the appeal to pity to convince her audience. Goodall uses emotional appeal effectively in her argument, because she evokes sympathy and empathy from her audience.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Essay: Lives Saved, Yet Many More Lives Lost Imagine that someone takes you from your cozy home, squeezes you into a cage, and takes you to a tall weird-looking building. Then, imagine that they force you to drink and take injections of liquids that you have never seen before. Suddenly, you start to feel sick and black out, forever. This is the story of more than a hundred million animals every year in animal testing labs.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Few examples exist that truly show how cruel people can be, and animal testing is high on the list. Imagine a beloved animal, caged in stainless steel, shaking, being analyzed for the effects of a new ingredient in a beauty product. Millions are drawn to protest the tests conducted for vanity, and some countries have already placed laws in action to ban the practice. The fight continues in the U.S. for the welfare of animals that are still undergoing vile tests so that people can have cosmetic products. The cry for justice grows louder as new technology allows far more accurate testing to be conducted, without ever involving innocent animals that will live out their lives and likely die in the laboratories, often as a result of the tests.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Though I concede that in some situations, animal testing may be useful, such as in immensely important medical studies, I still maintain that it is unnecessary to make an animal suffer and be discriminated against. Although some people may think that animal testing is healthy and beneficial to humans, I believe that animal testing is unethical and utterly wrong because of the unfair repulsive treatment that animals receive from scientists. This topic is important because the world we live in is as much an animal 's world as it is a human’s world and right now humans are discriminating and enslaving…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Among one of these people is Steve Siegal who wrote the article: “Animal Research is Unnecessary and Dangerous to Human Health”. Siegal brought up numerous points in his article, the most basic of these being as follows: “There is a basic immorality in forcing those weaker than us to be our testers” (Siegal 60). This simple statement in itself has such a powerful meaning. We do not need to dig any deeper in order to see that animal testing should be avoided, yet this statement does not suffice. We try to see past the immorality and try to do whatever may benefit us.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The removal of these live subjects should matter little, as scientists have claimed that animals are no longer necessary to manufacture a safe product. Once this bill becomes enacted into a law, a vast majority of animals will be safe to live a fulfilled with supportive caregivers. O’Neil effectively describes how the community views strongly against animal testing, and has the community’s best interests in mind when introducing this Bill to Parliament. This Bill is limited only within the borders of Australia, and does not serve to ban the practice of live animal testing overseas. This would therefore mean that animal experimentation would continue outside the authority of the Australian government even if this Bill were to become legislated.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays