Animal Testing Is Wrong Essay

Superior Essays
Is Animal Testing Wrong? In the current discussions of animal testing, an important argument has been whether or not animal testing is wrong, considering that animals have feelings. One viewpoint is that using animals for testing is completely okay and important in human survival. From this idea, many people such as Heloisa Sabin believe that “without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year” (158). Basically, Sabin is stating that sacrificing animals for testing saves human lives. From a conflicting position, others insist that animal testing is inhumane and extremely cruel. In the words and ideas of Peter Singer, “It is a demand that we cease to regard the exploitation of other species as natural and inevitable, …show more content…
Though I concede that in some situations, animal testing may be useful, such as in immensely important medical studies, I still maintain that it is unnecessary to make an animal suffer and be discriminated against. Although some people may think that animal testing is healthy and beneficial to humans, I believe that animal testing is unethical and utterly wrong because of the unfair repulsive treatment that animals receive from scientists. This topic is important because the world we live in is as much an animal 's world as it is a human’s world and right now humans are discriminating and enslaving …show more content…
Millions of animals are put through unavailing animal tests each year, and most of them suffer abuse that is senseless because most tests are inaccurate. Peggy Carlson, an animal rights activist and head of the humane society argues “Nearly everything that medicine has learned about what substances cause human cancer and birth defects has come from human clinical and epidemiological studies because animal experiments do not accurately predict what occurs in humans” (161). In other words animals are being used and abused in tests that are not even projecting similar results as they would if humans were to do the test. Scientists say animals are used in testing because they are similar to humans in many ways. The truth is, they are similar to humans in many ways, but we are not exactly identical and also have many differences that affect test results. That being said, animals have the ability to feel pain and suffer as humans do. Singer states that “the grounds for inferring that these animals can feel pain are nearly as good as the grounds for inferring other humans do” (135). Pretty much Singer means that there is no way to prove whether other humans or animals feel pain and there is about the same amount of evidence for each. Humans and animals both have similar nervous systems and both react the same way to pain.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This shows that getting research from animals for humans is not always approved by the human body, even if scientists say that animals have the same traits as humans. Animals are getting harmed as they are being tested on for research and it is very cruel because the outcome of the animal is dying and by the treatment that may not work on humans it is not worth it for the animals. As a matter of fact, Animal experimentation does not need to happen there is other alternatives that can replace…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A drug tested on animals to prove if it’s safe for humans is a very risky move because all drugs affect various species differently. Lastly, do we have the right to test on these creatures? ”There is no doubt that animals experience a life… Like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction” (Cothran 29). Animals feel much more pain that what we think and have a life that they should be allowed to live without the intrusion of humans. Animal experimentation, one of the many injustices we still have, should be a thing of the…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Along with their opinion that animal testing is unnecessary, animal rights activists are concerned that research animals receive poor treatment and care. However, “scientists, veterinarians, physicians, surgeons, and others who do research in animal laboratories are as much concerned about the care of the animals as anyone can be” (Animal Research 8). Animal rights groups make assumptions about the treatment of animals in research labs without accurate research to back up their statements. The groups say the animals are not adequately cared for, yet in reality the researchers are always making sure the animals are treated humanely and live comfortably. Additionally, “animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Animals In). “Some people, including some scientists object to the practice strictly on ethical and moral grounds, refuting or rejecting any scientific evidence that animal testing is helpful to humans.” (Judson 12). However, groups opposing the cruel treatment of animals were influential in getting regulations passed to protect welfare of animals. (Judson 10). A lot of people agree that the leading con of animal testing is how the animals are treated.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethics In Animal Testing

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Proponents of animal research want to argue that the avoidance of animals’ pain is not worth the suffering that humans endure; specifically when some human suffering can be prevented or treated with research using animals. “If a clinical research program will result in some procedure that has significant increases in well-being, then some suffering is justified” (Monaghan on Clinical Research, slide 36). This idea is skewed in animal testing. Yes, some of animal research has gone to benefit many humans and animals, but the fail rate of experiments at the costs of animals’ lives is just as great (Engel 4). The cost-benefit analysis regarding animal research has no good answer.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also new effective medical treatments have been effectively developed because of animal experiments. However the tests that the animals are used are extremely painful and immoral. Although people are using animals to satisfy their own desires and do not consider the rights of animals that were sacrificed for animal experiment. People should know that the animals used in animal experimentation are worthier than the benefits that people can earn…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The cons of animal testing is that it is inhumane and cruel and there are alternative ways to test products. I favor animal testing because it has a great contribution to life saving cures/ treatments, animals are similar to human beings in many ways, and it 's safer to test…

    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The drug was quickly taken off the market. Something else that you should keep in mind is that medical testing on animals “could mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments” ("Animal Testing - ProCon.org"). As said before, animals and humans have very different internal systems which means that some chemicals that would be harmful to animals could be perfectly fine to give to humans. An example of this is the drug aspirin. Aspirin is harmful to some animal species but alright to give to humans.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Data shows that testing on animals is not effective. It can often take research in the wrong direction. Examples, such as experiments proving that smoking both does and does not cause cancer, show how animal testing can be used to prove virtually any theory. Unlike the others, Carl Cohen’s piece, “Why animals have no rights”, is in favor of animal experimentation. He would refute Gluck’s claim that animal testing is morally wrong because he believes animals do not have rights.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays