The World Of Double Freak By William Lutz

Improved Essays
Every year, more than 100 million animals are being tested with products to help cure an illness, or are helping to better the life of humans. If these products work, then it is a success, but if they do not work it hurts the animal’s and it puts them in danger. Many may say it is a good thing because the products are being tested before handing them to a human. Animal testing is that it is wrong and dangerous and especially for the safety of medications for human consumption. Many researchers think that the animals’ and humans are the same type of skin, which is not true. People can be misled about the information on animal testing. It is very easy to cover up the bad. What they don’t know is that these animals are being hurt or …show more content…
Animals are being caused to get cancer or other different illnesses just to find a cure for it. If the medication does not work for the animals, they suffer. The World of Doublespeak by William Lutz speaks to us about how people try to make the bad seem good. They deny their responsibilities and avoid being responsible for whatever situation they put themselves in. This is something that is most likely to happen daily. We all live in a world of doublespeak. Moreover, as Murnaghan mentions, animal testing is seen as something good because it is helping researchers to find drugs and treatments to these illnesses. People say that it helps to ensure the safety of drugs (Murnaghan). As seen here, researchers tried to make the bad seem good. It is sad because these animals are being held in captivity. Some are killed after they are done with their experiment. Ian Murnaghan mentions how some of the substance tested is never even used for anything useful. These products are tested on these animals for practice because it is a substance that wouldn’t be approved or won’t have public consumption. Another thing is that researchers keep thinking that animals and humans are the same in the skin. Animals can have a lot of reactions to these chemicals as well as humans because the skin is different. So, testing an animal is not a guarantee that it will save the lives of all human beings. Each body is different and it …show more content…
That is why us humans need to feel their pain and understand that it is not right to make these animals go through pain. They need to stop falling for these misleading information that is given to everyone on a daily basis. Propaganda: How Not to Be Bamboozled by Donna Woolfolk Cross, mentions to us how we can be tricked in many methods to believe something that might not be real or they may mislead us. Card-Stacking, in this method people tend to focus on their point of view and ignores the rest of the peoples’ point of view. Cross mentions how these methods are some nasty tricks that people use and it is full of lies. So, having this in mind it card-stacking has a lot to do with my topic on animal testing because these researchers are just focusing on their facts and ignoring the rest. Even though people say that they are just animals it doesn’t mean that what they do to them hurts them. In fact, these animals suffer a lot in the process of the experiment and afterwards. Some may say that they take good care of these animals, but in reality do they? “Before their deaths, some are forced to inhale toxic fumes, others are immobilized in resistant devices for hours, some have holes drilled into their skulls, and others have their skin burned off or their spinal cords crushed” (Collins). It can be so easy to lie to someone and someone to believe because they are professionals and they are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits that more than half of their experiments involving animals result in the trash because the difficulty of handling with animals are producing false information. Animal testing is unpredictable because the condition of each individual animal and species will vary. Clearly, experimenting with animals is unreasonable, dangerous, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal Testing Millions of animals are being used for medical and beauty products, along with biology lessons and medical training exercises, which is causing the animals to live their lives full of fear and torture. Although, it is known that animal testing is wrong, there are limited regulations to stop it, so this topic can get to be very controversial. Background on a topic can change a person’s point of view because it gives knowledge that they might not have. More than 100 million animals suffer and die every year, but only 5% of the animals are protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (Peta, ProCon). Out of that 100 million, approximately 26 million of those animals are used for commercial and scientific testing (ProCon).…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They use animal to check the safety of product, develop medical ,determine toxicity of substance. The horrific picture of animal being mistreated and horrendous would make anybody pity these poor animals. Animals testing is morally wrong because of the horrendous and mistreated of our animal brethren.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    states (Clemmitt 10). To repeat, chances are, no one is for sure that a medicine nor a chemical will be safe on us just for an experiment a scientist does on an animal. Despite the differences from each side of the issue, we both can agree that animal testing successfully helped discover information pertaining to our bodies and how it works. Not only does animal testing harm animals themselves, but it can as well harm us.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is not only harmful to the animals, but cruel. In the article Results from Research on Animals Are Not Valid When Applied to Humans, it says, “animals in laboratories are frequently treated as objects that can be manipulated at will, with little value for their lives beyond the cost of purchase.” this shows that the animals that are being tested are treated with disrespect, and are not properly cared for. Another reason that it is cruel is that “In most cases, researchers attempt to minimize the pain and distress experienced by animals in laboratories, but suffering is nonetheless inherent as animals are held in sterile, isolated cages, forced to suffer disease and injury, or euthanised at the end of the study.” as stated in the same…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For decades, animal testing has been and still is one of the most controversial topics discuss in the modern world, our society is no exception. Like a never-ending story, animals have been brutally used as testing objects in scientific research purposely for humans’ usage. It can be dated back as early as 1880’s that animals including mice, pigs, rabbits, and etc. were exploited in scientific experiments. Vaccines, medicines, and cures are discovered with animal testing, but the practice of using animals in research testing is unnecessary especially with the availability of advanced technology that we have now. Animal protection organizations and animal rights groups including John Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing have been…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goldberg, the author explores animal testing from a slightly different perspective. Goldberg acknowledges that sometimes animal testing can be beneficial, but he also goes into detail about other ways in which the same testing can be done with little or no use of whole living animals. The process of in vitro can be utilized in order to study different drugs on individual colonies of cells as opposed to whole organisms (Goldberg). This is really important in backing up the argument that animals should not be used as test subjects, especially if there is a way around…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing should stay legal and have no restrictions so long that it is benefiting humans and the greater good. Cancer, heart disease, and other various incurable illnesses are present in today’s world and taking many lives with them. Animal testing can help to develop medications to aide or even cure these illnesses in humans. Our health fields today are booming due to advances in medicines and drugs. Animal testing plays a very important role in our medication advancements and improving the overall health of our human race.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most of the population see animal testing as cruel yet a necessity for medical progress. But, do the benefits outweigh the costs? Is animal research reliable on humans? According to Aysha Akhtar, the Food and Drug Administration estimated that 92 percent of drugs that pass animals testing, later fails in humans (410). There are many differences among animal species, while some medications and/or chemicals are harmless to humans they can be lethal to animals and vice versa.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of animals for commercial and scientific testing is inhumane. According to Dawkins, “all suffering is undesirable, whether it be in humans or animals”. The tests need to be conducted on animals because we don’t know what the reaction will be. Test subjects that are used go through endless suffering and pain on a daily basis because the research conducted isn’t near perfection. The scientists who are using animals as their test subject do not care about the animal’s lives.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    n the late 1800s animal testing emerged as a way of testing human inventions before applying them to a human organism. Due to the lack of technology, animals seemed to be the most accurate way to predict a human’s reaction to a product before risking the life of a person. While this practice might have been one of the better options in the past, it is unreliable and needs to be eradicated. Every year approximately 17-22 million animals are used in research testing. Not all of the testing is done for medical research; in fact many are done by cosmetic companies.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is probably one of the most debatable topics of medicine today. It has been used for over a century and a half, and it still continues to expand its usage more and more every year. Although banned in some countries, statistics of others are terrifying, making us question whether it is or it isn’t the right choice when it comes to using innocent animals for research purposes. First of all, animals do not choose to be in a lab. They do not get to choose to be treated like they are, and definitely do not choose to be manipulated by us, humans.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned Everyday innocent animals are being forced into labs and tested for human research advancement. Cruelty Free International states how approximately 115 million animals, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, mice, dogs and monkeys are used in dangerous laboratory experiments every year. In fact, many of the experiments are said to be useless tests, as stated, “The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable” (“Animal Testing is Bad Science”). Misconceptions by the media may stretch the idea how animal testing can cure diseases, illnesses etc.. But actually, as emphasized, animal testing is an inefficient way of finding medical advances, making the procedures to be unnecessary and making there be no reason to force animals into labs without a choice, it's blatantly a waste of animals lives.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the act of using them as test subjects is not justifiable by any means, especially because humans and animals do not have similar bodies, and some diseases such as HIV-AIDS do not attack animals. Hence, testing for such diseases’ drugs on animals may not offer conclusive results. Moreover, use of animal tests greatly infringes animal rights, because just like humans, animals also have their rights. Additionally, such tests greatly inflict a lot of pain and suffering to these animals, because some of the tests run on them are quite painful and in most cases deadly. Therefore, animals should be treated with consideration and care and not as test…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays