Animal Testing Benefits

Decent Essays
Most of the population see animal testing as cruel yet a necessity for medical progress. But, do the benefits outweigh the costs? Is animal research reliable on humans? According to Aysha Akhtar, the Food and Drug Administration estimated that 92 percent of drugs that pass animals testing, later fails in humans (410). There are many differences among animal species, while some medications and/or chemicals are harmless to humans they can be lethal to animals and vice versa. For example, arsenic is poisonous for humans, but for sheep is harmless; acetaminophen is lethal to cats but safe for humans; morphine is a stimulant for some animals such as cats and horses, but it is a sedative to humans and other animals such as mice. Animals are not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Every year, more than 100 million animals are being tested with products to help cure an illness, or are helping to better the life of humans. If these products work, then it is a success, but if they do not work it hurts the animal’s and it puts them in danger. Many may say it is a good thing because the products are being tested before handing them to a human. Animal testing is that it is wrong and dangerous and especially for the safety of medications for human consumption.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, prior to the article I did not contemplate or think about the issue or even its effectiveness. One thing in which I was surprised by was some of the statistics that was mentioned throughout the article. For example, I was unaware that out of all the drugs that pass animal tests, about 94 percent will fail clinical trials for humans. Majority of drugs that pass animal tests are often discarded immediately due to being deemed useless or harmful to humans, which is one of the reasons why activists contemplates that animal testing is useless (Stachura, 2008).…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits that more than half of their experiments involving animals result in the trash because the difficulty of handling with animals are producing false information. Animal testing is unpredictable because the condition of each individual animal and species will vary. Clearly, experimenting with animals is unreasonable, dangerous, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some doctors and scientists believe animal testing is not the best method for medical advances for many reasons and examples. In multiple cases, certain drugs have proven effective on animals but are not effective on humans. This occurs most often when testing drugs for stroke. Others include the following examples: a therapeutic dose of aspirin in a human is poisonous, but it has no negative effects to different animals; benzene causes leukemia in humans but not in mice; insulin produces birth defects in humans but not in animals; morphine calms people but excites some animals; chloramphenicol produces aplastic anemia in some humans but saves animals; fenclozic acid causes liver toxicity in people but not in some animals; penicillin is highly poisonous to a few animals but helps humans (Gorman 49).…

    • 1858 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The authors support their assertion by providing examples of needing animal experimentation for testing drugs and because some animal species are very similar to humans— genetical — so animals should continue to be tested, concluding “public opinion must be made aware that hypotheses in the biomedical field is just as likely to fail as in any other field of research. Only continuing trial- and -error to understand errors will show the best way to reach a goal” (34). The authors statement is necessary because in order to judge animal experimentation you must understand it from both sides— in order for researchers to progress even further they must continue trials and errors during animal experimentations. Their purpose is to make readers aware of the benefits of researching animals by animal experimentation from a researcher’s perspective, rather than just what is on the media. The authors establish a relationship of enlightenment with their audience of animal enthusiasts to show how essential animal experimentation is and that research thrives on “trial and error”…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilizing living animal for the benefit of researcher and for the testing many types of products has been a matter of heated debate for for many of years now. Many people consider animals as pets or companions; whereas others look upon animals as only aids for researchers to study on. Despite peoples feeling towards animals, the reality is that animals across the country and around the world animals are being abused by cosmetics companies and research facilities. Even though humans sometimes benefit from successful animal testing, the pain, the torment, and deaths of the animals are not worth the potential benefits it may bring to humans. However, With all the new advancements in medical and scientific technology, the pain and suffering of…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Essay: Lives Saved, Yet Many More Lives Lost Imagine that someone takes you from your cozy home, squeezes you into a cage, and takes you to a tall weird-looking building. Then, imagine that they force you to drink and take injections of liquids that you have never seen before. Suddenly, you start to feel sick and black out, forever. This is the story of more than a hundred million animals every year in animal testing labs.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lifesaving drugs and medication could come out even faster if scientists tested on humans rather than animals because of the difference in human and animal body chemistry. Considering this, animal testing cannot be justified by the fact that it has saved many human…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Testing is Cruel and Unnecessary The use of animal testing is very popular today in the advancement of medicine, but the costly effects outweigh the benefits. There are many cost effective and positive alternatives to animal testing. It is not useful for the advancements of medicine and is only still around today for the financial benefits that come with these tests. Can we truly eliminate animals from medical research?…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anaesthetics are not used frequently because of their variety of effects on the test subject (Animal Aid). For example, anaesthetics can cause the data to become less relatable to human bodily reactions (Animal Aid). Consequently, animals become extremely vulnerable as they are forced to participate in unpredictable and abusive experiments without any pain relief. These processes appear to be identical to torture by inflicting pain on the test subjects without aiding them in any way. Dogs are most commonly used without anaesthetics- animals that many of Americans adore and love as one of their own (Animal Aid).…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dillon Haynes Mrs. Mable Literature 04 May 2017 The Improper Use of Animals 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials. According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, over 100 stroke drugs that were effective when tested on animals have failed in humans. Animals are poor models for human beings because of their cellular differences and can cause major problems. Based on research and evidence, testing on animals is cruel and should be brought to the attention of everyone.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Millions of animals are put through unavailing animal tests each year, and most of them suffer abuse that is senseless because most tests are inaccurate. Peggy Carlson, an animal rights activist and head of the humane society argues “Nearly everything that medicine has learned about what substances cause human cancer and birth defects has come from human clinical and epidemiological studies because animal experiments do not accurately predict what occurs in humans” (161). In other words animals are being used and abused in tests that are not even projecting similar results as they would if humans were to do the test. Scientists say animals are used in testing because they are similar to humans in many ways. The truth is, they are similar to humans in many ways, but we are not exactly identical and also have many differences that affect test results.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Testing On Animals

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay: Introduction: “Is the use of laboratory animals for drug testing is justified?” Animal testing is a practise that has been done for many years for the fundamental purpose of investigating problems and side effects that may occur when using a chemical substance or a drug on the human body. Rather than testing it on a human the scientist tests this substance on an animal closely related to humans with both genetics and structure e.g. apes and orang-utan. After this is done, the scientist then considers the safety of the chemical and chooses if it is safe enough to get tested on human volunteers. The same procedure happens to investigate a drug that may cure some sort of illness /disease.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays