Nuisance

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 1 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The legal issues that have arisen in this scenario are those concerned with private nuisance. The tort of private nuisance has been developed to protect the interests of land owners who have the right to the use and enjoyment of their property without interference. It is effectively the land that is protected and only those who own or have an interest in the land may bring a claim in private nuisance. The nuisance that Kate is suffering stems from the noise generated by a nearby airfield. Statute and case law will be employed to determine whether Kate has a case and what remedies if any are available to her. When cases of private nuisance arise it is not always possible to ascertain what the outcome will be. This is because the courts will usually be required to resolve competing interests between neighbouring properties both with owners or other interested parties who will also have the right to the use and enjoyment of their land. A private nuisance may be defined as an unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of land or with some right over, or connection with it. Steele, J (2014) p 595. For example, contaminating another persons land with little or toxic fumes would be considered to be a private nuisance. Kate bought the property two years ago and moved…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuisance Laws

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The way that the courts would deal with the pollution associated with slaughterhouses, fat melting and bone boiling establishments, and other traditional nuisance industries was by enforcing the nuisance law that would protect those affected by the industrial pollution emitted by these particular industries. The legal doctrines that the courts would generally enforce would come from the principles of the legal proverb: sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas, “so use your own as not to injure…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stuart Mills Nuisance

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The issue of a nuisance in society has always been a problem. The idea that an individual is so much of a problem that the government/society has to intervene is a troubling idea. However, john Stuart mills, would state that it is wrong for the government/society to intervene in an individual’s life. But, the issue of the nuisance is that he is a threat to himself and the people around him. According to john Stuart mills, “The liberty of the individual must be thus far limited; he must not…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The above mentioned points are discussed in details as follows. (a) Nuisance – In the words of R.N.D. Hamiton “ the deepest doctrinal roots of modern environmental law are found in the common law principles of nuisance. It may be caused through escape of water, filthy liquid or substances, smokes, fumes, gas, noise, heat, vibrations, electricity, disease, bacteria, trees, etc”. Literal meaning of nuisance is anything that annoys, hurts or offends, but for an interference to an actionable…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Issue: Tenants are losing their properties without being notified and heard in Chronic Nuisance Ordinance jurisdictions. They are losing their property and liberty interest, whiles people in similar situations that are not under the CNO are not. Rule: Due Process/ Mathews test/ Additional safeguards - “due process requires that, when a State seeks to terminate an interest . . . it must afford notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuisance can be separated into private, public and statutory nuisance. Private nuisance is “ the unreasonable use of man of his land to the detriment of his neighbour (Miller v. Jackson [1977] QB 966 (CA); 3 All ER 338) and can only be claimed by the individual affected that has an interest in the land . The potential defendants can be the creators of the nuisance, regardless of whether they are also the occupiers of the property . However, if the occupier or landlord are not the creators…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Can Benario, Conant, and Gossard claim private nuisance against Copeland when his elaborate display includes overbearing music and bright lights that prevents nearby neighbors’ in a residential area from getting a restful night sleep, and enjoying their property? BRIEF ANSWER Yes. Under Missouri law, private nuisance is a conjunctive test where both of the following elements must be met: (1) unreasonable, unnatural or unusual use of land which (2) substantially harms the rights of another to…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many dogs roaming around in the streets. Most dogs are owned and have a family to live in; however, there are still some that are homeless and are not leashed. Unleashed dogs are a dangerous nuisance because people that have children or other animals get attacked by the unleashed dogs, they cause public nuisance, and they provoke fights with other dogs or animals.. Many people have unleashed dogs because they want to have the house guarded through the day, or the night. Some dogs just…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What if you were in the middle of a test and someone pulls out a fidget spinner? You would most likely get distracted.You would not be able to concentrate because they are spinning it repeatedly, and you think that it is so cool. Then, they start to do cool tricks, so you really want to watch even more but you're still taking a test. Fidget spinners should be banned from school because they are distracting, a nuisance, and lastly they are dangerous. Not only are fidget spinners a distraction…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PARTIES: P = Ensign and others D = Walls PRIOR HISTORY: Plaintiffs claimed that Defendant’s business constitutes a nuisance. Trial court enjoined defendant from continuing her business after 90 days. Defendant appealed. FACTS: For some years, at 13949 Dacosta street, in the city of Detroit, the Defendant had a business of raising, breeding and boarding St. Bernard dogs. Her business is adjacent to the Plaintiff's neighbor, Defendant's business would give off obnoxious odors and…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Previous
    Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50