Book of Judges

Criminal defense attorneys are skilled professionals who have experience defending their clients against serious felony or misdemeanor criminal charges. The best criminal defense professionals have completed years of education in the law and criminal defense fields and they have hundreds of hours of real-world courtroom experience facing aggressive prosecutors. When faced with a criminal complaint, the defendant must know how to find the best defense team available in order to increase their…

After reading the story “The myth of the Latin Woman”, I was not surprised that people still to this day carry the mindset of racial stereotyping. Even though that no matter how much a person tries to avoid being prejudged and cast away from their culture, they would still be judged from what people see portrayed in the media. However even until this day, I am and will forever be a victim of being labeled due to the color of my skin in this society. I myself as well as others in society am…

#1 –– Under what circumstances might prosecutors engage in mis-conduct? What are four types of prosecutorial misconduct? The textbook makes it very clear that attorneys undergo many unique pressures from multiple sources. They have an enormous obligation to represent their client in the best possible manner, despite the fact they may be dealing with a weak case with an inadequate amount of evidence. Therefore, often times attorneys have to over emphasize the relevance and cruciality of their…

That doesn’t mean they don’t exist or matter. Even the closest friends we think we know the best, we really don’t. Nobody could know an entire person's life from beginning to end. There’s so many things we don’t know about others, so who are we to judge them? In the story called The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton, there’s 2 very disparate cliques. One called…

The individuals and organizations who decide to file an amicus brief must adhere to the specific regulations and guidelines, which are set by the United States Supreme Court. To file an amicus brief, the interested individual and or group must previously receive permission of all parties involved in the case, which is being heard. Although, “the United States SolicitorGeneral, government agencies, and local or state governments do not have to seek permission to file” an amicus brief (Salzman;…

The AGCO is governed by Alcohol and Gaming Regulation and Public Protection Act, 1996; Gaming Control Act, 1992; Liquor License Act; Wine Content and Labeling Act, 2000; and the Liquor Control Act sec. 3(1) b,e,f,g and 3(2)a. The AGCO deals with several matters such as alcohol hearings and appeals, gaming hearings and appeals, horse racing hearing and appeals, public interest hearings, and arbitration of lottery disputes. If the hearing/appeal is about matters that deal with alcohol, then it is…

The Purpose Behind “Twelve Angry Men” The purpose behind the play “Twelve Angry Men” is to address the realities of what happens on a jury behind closed doors. The author, Reginald Rose, wants readers and viewers to realize being on a jury is not easy and requires careful thinking throughout the decision-making process. Each jury member represents the types of people that serve on an actual jury. Rose does not want to sugar coat the true actions that occur when serving along with strangers.…

1. This appeal was critical of both the crown counsel and the trial judge in this case because of the credibility during the trial became an issue. Even though some objection was taken, crown counsel did not warn the jury, and gave instruction to neutralize the impropriety. Also, the cross-examination of the appellant was not fair and improper. Therefore, the appellant brought up four grounds of appeal, and the first ground of appeal was granted under the remedy. The first ground was that the…

The final argument that was presented was that the plaintiff has to prove that there was intent to discriminate in order to establish an equal protection violation. Under this argument the respondents claim that the courts have consistently ruled that intent must be established in order to back up any claims of violations. They claimed that previous courts have conceded that “the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal laws but not equal results” . They argued that the plaintiff has failed to…

were families of the defendant. The courtroom could be an intimidating and uneasy place to be in for most people unless you're a lawyer or other members of the courthouse. As we all know courts and courtrooms are a place of power, being that the judge has the last to said along with the…