Although, I do agree that there are merits to full inclusion, I do not believe that it is the right choice for every child with a disability. There cannot be one rule that applies to all students with disabilities, which range from severely mentally handicapped to mild cases of ADHD. I agree with Kauffman, McGee and Brigham’s assertion (2008) that the goals of full inclusion are more for the perception of normalization with a disregard of expected proficiency. Placing students who cannot function at the relative level of their peers “fosters the impression that students are fitting in,” (p.93) when in reality this in not that case. Within full inclusion students with disabilities are given more support in achieving their goals, not only
