Ticking time bomb scenario

Is the act-utilitarian argument for torture in ticking bomb scenarios correct? Act-Utilitarianism is the rightness of actions depending entirely on how they impact welfare or happiness. In which, the decision will be attempting to maximize both welfare and happiness. Utilitarianism sees no action as bad in itself because morality is decided by the consequences of actions. The “right thing to do” of saving the innocent is necessary to be compared and evaluated against the bad. This is set to be able to make a complete and correct decision on the action taken. On the other hand, deontologists believe our moral obligations do not entirely depend on the consequences of our actions. Deontologists believe that no matter the situation, that actions are either wrong or right, regardless of what it may impact. So even in the case of saving lives or a good consequence of some sort, a wrong decision will always be wrong. This outlook is visible through: The Golden Rule or The Ten Commandments. Furthermore, deontologism is an ideal/belief that pursues to form universal rules for the ethics of human action. Kant summarizes this viewpoint with a deontological method by forging two universal rules: “Act as though the maxim of your action were by your will to become a…

Marcia Baron and Alan Dershowitz both have different views as to what the permissibility of torture should be, especially with regards to the famed Ticking Bomb Hypothetical which has been used on multiple occasions to permit and even encourage torture as an information gathering tactic. Baron makes it clear that she recognizes there might be extreme cases where torture is understood as the lesser of two evils, but that the Ticking Bomb Hypothetical should not be considered a viable hypothetical…

Torture can be used to realize valuable information that could help avert an atrocity. If a terrorist who has planted a bomb and a jumbo jet is the only one who can disarm it, he may be subjected to torture to give information that can help in disarming the bomb. Therefore, torture is necessary at times for saving lives and property especially if the terrorist can give information that can help to avert an imminent act of terror. A terrorist possesses information that could help a lot. If…

that Zubaydah had revealed significant information with regard to the apprehension of two al Qaeda leaders. However, this information was already known according to the 9/11 Commission Report. Moreover, some of the information was revealed without the use of coercion. Bush also claimed that Abu Zubaydah identified another al Qaeda leader upon being subjected to the mentioned CIA treatment. Since the critical information was obtained from tip offs, this claim is also doubtful. The assumptions…

Alexander argues "even in a ticking time bomb situation, which he encountered in Iraq with suicide bombers, a relationship-building approach is superior and does not have to be time-consuming." (Pfiffner, n.d.) It is the government's duty to protect its citizens from the anticipation and the act of being terrorized. The question remains: Is torture ever justified? Should governments be given judicial approval for using torture in the 'extreme…

Many scholars who seek to justify the use of torture use the consequentialist argument by saying the positive consequences compensate for any of the negatives. Thus saying torture is a permissible mechanism as long as torture is the lesser of two evils. In order for those who support torture to fortify and expand their stance, they depend greatly on the theoretical scenario of a ticking bomb, which was formerly thought of by an English philosopher known as Bentham (Bellamy 137). The ticking bomb…

institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

An example of this would be the ticking time bomb scenario as the information gained from torturing this terrorist would save thousands of lives at the expense of a few the effect of torture is massive not only on the receiver but the torturers as they have to give out this pain. But the lives saved are considered more valuable than the morals or a few lives. What if in the ticking time bomb scenario you couldn 't get the information from the terrorist as he was ready to die for his beliefs but…

torture to extract information, generally from terrorists or suspected terrorists held in US, or allied, custody. However, there are no realistic scenarios in which the application of torture against prisoners of the United States is ethically permissible. One of the more common scenarios devised by proponents of the usage of torture is the Ticking Time Bomb, which posits that there is a time bomb which a terrorist in US custody has the information necessary to defuse. From a Utilitarian…

Ticking Time Bomb The term torture makes teeth cringe with scenes of a person tied down to a chair with ruptured lips, busted up face, in a closed place full of people taking turns in “punching the truth” out of them. Torturers have an illusion of discovering the “truth” through inventive shapes of inflicting tortuous pain on a terrorist. Throughout times of crisis, this technique can be attractive to practice. The ticking time bomb scenario is always a form in a try to justify torture. These…