Act Utilitarian Argument For Torture Essay

Is the act-utilitarian argument for torture in ticking bomb scenarios correct?
Act-Utilitarianism is the rightness of actions depending entirely on how they impact welfare or happiness. In which, the decision will be attempting to maximize both welfare and happiness. Utilitarianism sees no action as bad in itself because morality is decided by the consequences of actions. The “right thing to do” of saving the innocent is necessary to be compared and evaluated against the bad. This is set to be able to make a complete and correct decision on the action taken. On the other hand, deontologists believe our moral obligations do not entirely depend on the consequences of our actions. Deontologists believe that no matter the situation, that actions are either wrong or right, regardless of what it may impact. So even in the case of saving lives or a good consequence of some sort, a wrong decision will always be wrong. This outlook is visible through: The Golden Rule or The Ten Commandments. Furthermore, deontologism is an ideal/belief that pursues to form universal rules for the ethics of human action. Kant summarizes this viewpoint with a deontological method by forging two universal rules: “Act as though the maxim of your action were by your will to become a …show more content…
However, because the instantaneous decision is so tough and because the person making it is in a situation of high consequence. I would absolutely not condemn the verdict to torture provided it was chosen in an emergency state and with the correct purpose. To be ignorant and conceive a premature judgement that torture is justified in some way is dangerous and wrong. Although, I strongly suggest to understand the mitigating conditions when it occurs is equally imperative. In the end, torture has to still be labeled as a crime wherever it occurs, and deserves the same legal process as any other act against the