Michael Levin The Case For Torture Summary

Improved Essays
The best Way to Deal with Terrorists
Is it really necessary to torture or make people suffer just to get stuff that we need from them? After reading “The Case for Torture” by Dr. Michael Levin, I disagree with torturing terrorists to gain information. I am totally against with torture or punish terrorists because first, most terrorists are forced to act in the way they do, they have no power over their actions. Secondly, it is possible to transform the bad feelings inside them to a good one, I believe everyone deserves a second chance. Finally, I believe only God has the power to do the right justice to those terrorists. So who are we to judge?
My first reason why I believe terrorists do not deserve to be tortured is that they might be forced into it. They could be a part of a hierarchy that has control over them. If they do not do what their master says, they too could be beheaded or bombed. Terrorists are under a lot of pressure too when they have to bomb our country and others because one little mistake and they are goners. They are just trying to save their skins. Michael Levin said, “How can we tell 300,100, or 10 people who never asked to be put
…show more content…
My reasons include God has the power to punish who he knows deserves it, everyone even killers deserve a second chance to redeem themselves and turn their life around, and finally that the terrorists might be forced into it. If the terrorists are really doing something wrong, then they would have been defeated when they started. Only God can truly decide what is right and what is wrong. Why should we put someone else’s life at risk or even death just because someone did the same thing first? Like I said, why fight fire with fire? “Isn’t there a danger of error and abuse? We won’t turn into Them (Levin 524)”? Think about this statement next time you are wondering if terrorists deserve punishment in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The answer to that question should be easy. At the same time, torture should not be used for much smaller crimes compared to terrorism. For example, someone robbing a bank. Even though it is crucial to get the money back, it isn’t that extreme of a crime where it would have to result torture the culprit in order to find out where they hid…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons why the torture shouldn’t be legal. For example, what if the suspected bomber, isn’t the mastermind behind the whole plan. If the person tries to tell the police that, they obviously won’t believe the person and torture them worse. Another reason why it shouldn’t be legal is, what if the suspected bomber decides to not tell the police anything. If the suspected bomber is willing to die to make sure the plan is accomplished, then not only did the police kill someone, they also wasted time that could’ve been spent searching for the…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Interrogating one man can help reveal additional information to help foil any other possible plans the terrorist may have up his sleeves. In addition the utilitarian principle still applies in this situation. In fact, it is even more justifiable, because the torturer only places one person in pain. Not only do you get to save more lives, but torturing someone only causes them temporary physical pain. Killing thousands is permanent damage.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Sandel Justice

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a hypothetical scenario, if there was an Al-Qaeda terrorist that did not want to give up information, is it ok to inflict torture in order to get information out of him? For this approach, justice would be that torture should be practiced on the terrorist in order to maximize the welfare of the many lives we would be saving by torturing the terrorist. While this approach does have many hypothetical scenarios in which it would make sense to have one person harmed rather than the other, there are many time where the person being negatively affected does not obtain their human rights. One very shocking observations Sandel discusses some ways, through our current governmental structure, we aren’t obtaining our human…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the terrorists are caught and put in the court of law, it should be mandatory that they do not get the priviledge to our rights. These rights include: the right to remain silent, the right to confront witnesses, the right to a public trial, the right to a jury trial, the right to a speedy trial, the right to adequate representation, the right to be represented by an attorney, the right to not be placed in double jeopardy. (Nolo.com, 2015) The rights stated above are rights that are given to the criminal defendant in America. There are infact, “pro’s” to being privileged enough with those rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first reason torture should be justified is as followed: the use of torture can save lives and prevent future acts of terrorism. Through the process of torture, the US, was able to distinguish connections between Khalid Sheik Muhammed and Jose Padilla. The use of torture was conducted on al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah. Khalid Sheik Muhammed and Jose Padilla are two international terrorists that have committed terrorist actions m42k.p against the United States. When Khalid Sheik Mohammed was taken by the US in Pakistan, the use of torture gave the US new intel on new crimes that were being planned against the US.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States may have captured many person who they are accusing of being a terrorist suspect and correctly identified them as terrorist but that does not neutralize the possibility of a person being falsely accusing. Allowing known terrorists to be tortured for information is acceptable morally incorrect but acceptable, but once the word 'suspect' is used it creates a different meaning for the question. Under the eighth amendment which says “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted”. While it is the Supreme Court that decides what is considered cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture: An Ethical Debate

    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Torture has been the focus of ethical debate for quite some time. Many people have very different, opposing thoughts on whether it is alright to torture somebody or not. Whether it be torturing for information to save lives or punishment, the morals of have been discussed. Two schools of thought with differing views would be Human Rights advocates and the Consequentialists. A Human Rights advocate would suggest that torture is a cruel, unreliable method for retrieving information while a Consequentialist would likely believe torture to be acceptable if it benefits more people than it harms.…

    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Interrogation and Torture In the Roman civilization torture was used mostly as a means of entertainment in the form of gladiator fights, and throughout history torture has been used as punishment by the state the senate, the public, and even the church. In the 17th and 18th century torture had its fall and that was thought to be the end of the era of harsh physical torture. However Since 2001 there has been a rise in torture. Im sure everyone knows what an interrogation is.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Of Torture Essay

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The practice of using torture is one of the ethical controversies of all time, especially in obtaining information from suspected terrorists. According to Arthur .F. Holmes, individuals will have different decisions, which depends on the theories they stand for. Based on the definition, utilitarianism maximizes the benefits of people and considers the consequence of the whole community. In other words, utilitarian would give their decisions after examining whether the specific issue fits their standard of good and/ or right. From this perspective, one might believe that torture is the most ethical choice as prisoner should deal with what they deserve, and it would give a high degree of probability that prisoner's resolve will be broken.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin makes it clear that torture should not be used as punishment, but as a way to prevent future terror. No terrorist victim should lose his or her life just because America considers torture as unethical. One example Michael provided was when former president Roosevelt faced an ethical dilemma; in 1943 he could have had Hitler killed but did not based on ethical grounds. However, in this time period Americans now see that if he would have had him killed the war would have ended, and many lives would have been saved. A different time Levin also appealed to the audience’s logical reasoning was when he said torture was justified since “unlike his victims, he volunteered for the risks of his deed.”…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 1287 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imagine a terrorist has planted a bomb somewhere on campus, the police have captured him, and they know that the bomb will explode in an hour if they cannot find it first. One option would be to persuade the terrorist to give up the location of the bomb, perhaps offering some sort of immunity or reward for doing so. What happens then if the man still does not give up the location? The police now are forced to make a moral decision; either break the law and torture the terrorist to get the information, or let the bomb go off, killing many innocent people. This is where the advocates for the use of torture would say that it is fair to use.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To torture or not to torture is a very sensitive question. To side with torture or not to requires a lot of thought, research, and your ability to understand your own morals. The country has been debating this issue for quite some time and it has divided this nation on the issue of whether or not to close the facility that houses torture for terrorists. The facilities purpose is to stop terrorists from harming the US. Furthermore, there are four theories, utilitarianism, Kantian duty-based ethics, virtue ethics, and Christian-principle based ethics, that may answer the question of whether or not to allow torture in this country.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Torture

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of torture in the United States should not be justified. Torture is defined as intentionally causing physical, mental, emotional and psychological discomfort to the unwilling individual in order to gain information. This involves the employment of physical assault, administering mind-altering drugs, beatings, rape and all other behaviors that may most likely inflict heavy pain and bodily harm as well as affecting the mind of human beings. Personally, I am against the act of torture that is often perpetuated by inhuman people who simply feel that they have much at their disposal and often do what is good for them. Allowing torture causes a heavy infringement on human rights.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay Against Torture

    • 1291 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to the topic of torturing terrorists for information, most of us will readily agree that it’s a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether useful information could be gained from torturing terrorists. Whereas some are convinced that torture could be used as a tool for obtaining information, others maintain that torture is not effective and can even result in gaining false information. I agree that torture is a necessary tool for gaining information from terrorists because it is possible that future terrorist attacks can happen. Torture should be used to prevent future attacks and provide safety to American citizens as it is an effective way of gaining information.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays