Acceptability Of Torture Essay

Improved Essays
The Case for Torture
People struggle to determine the acceptability of torture. Each one has his opinion regarding torture depending on his point of view. Sometimes the importance of information outweighs the importance of morals. Therefore, it is important to put aside morals and sympathy especially in situations where thousands of innocent lives are at stake. Saving many lives at the expense of a single individual who is orchestrating matter is more permissible.Torture, an advanced interrogation technique, gathers information far more efficiently than any other technique, and it should be justified because information can be more easily retrieved from criminals. Torture is justified as a measure of preventing future evils because it is an
…show more content…
Torture can be used to realize valuable information that could help avert an atrocity. If a terrorist who has planted a bomb and a jumbo jet is the only one who can disarm it, he may be subjected to torture to give information that can help in disarming the bomb. Therefore, torture is necessary at times for saving lives and property especially if the terrorist can give information that can help to avert an imminent act of terror. A terrorist possesses information that could help a lot. If applied correctly, torture can work quickly and effectively because it outwits the detainee because he is not able to resist. Justifying torture is the same as justifying self-defense. The right to self-defense is inviolable, and it extends to the defense of another. It may be true to assert that torture does not go against the morals of the society because it is worth the temporary pain to the detainee to save many lives. Torture is, therefore, a necessary tactic for thwarting potential terrorist attacks. Torture may be barbaric, but mass murder is far more barbaric. Furthermore, it is often argued that it would have been worth assassinating Hitler in 1943 as it would have shortened that war and saved millions of lives. Therefore, it is important to protect the rights of many individuals who are threatened by terrorists by applying torture

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The Term Torture

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term “Torture” derives from the Latin word “tortus” meaning “twisted. Torture involves the intentional infliction of physical or mental pain on a person to fulfill some desire of the perpetrator or to compel some action from the victim. The following are some general definitions of torture. 1. Torture is the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Diagnostic: “The Torture Myth” by Anne Applebaum After the events of September 11, 2001, America launched into an anti-terrorism fight that was different from any other fight seen before. The aspiration for three-letter government agencies became information. Information became the most valuable asset in warfare. Initially, torture was the obvious choice for extracting information. However, officials started to question its effectiveness.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jessica Wolfendale discusses what permitting torture would involve realistically in her work Training Torturers: A Critique of the “Ticking Bomb” Argument. The hypothetical ticking bomb argument fails to distinguish a justification of the general practice and individual instances of torture. She refers to the discussion as “a new war in which moral constraints do not apply”, for to allow torture is to allow the training of torturers. Historically they have been chosen for obedience, trustworthiness, political beliefs, and endurance of pain. Torturers would have to be trained in interrogational torture.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we use torture tactics we could prevent more major terrorist attacks. Torture is the easiest way to get information out of terrorist. The CIA would only use torture methods on Al Qaeda leaders in order to get information that may prevent future attacks. Personally I believe that these torture methods are justified because of what they do to POW’s overseas. 59% of the American society support the CIA’s methods according to new polls conducted by telephone calls.(Adam Goldman reports on terrorism and national security for The Washington Post.)…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dialawar Torture Effects

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages

    That quote speaks volumes, understanding that if torture is being accepted and practiced, how that does make you any better than the enemies and the same people called terrorist. That is exactly how they view the tortures’, the tortures’ become the terrorist, the enemy just depends on which side a person is on. There is no justification for the same thing you…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “A Case for Torture,” Michael Levin makes the erroneous claim that torture is permissible because he does not address the countless legal issues connected to the controversy. Instead of choosing to include verifiable facts that disprove the legitimacy of torture, Levin manipulates his readers’ emotions through the use of pathos, the fabrication of improbable tragedies, and unsourced studies. Levin’s “A Case for Torture” is purposely flawed in hopes of convincing his audience to join him in advocating for…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the infliction of pain on individuals endangering the U.S., it creates a deterrent or a scare tactic towards other nations ("Torture Is a Just Means of Preventing Terrorism."). The idea of torture strikes fear into the hearts of terrorist subjects because it can be brutal when they fail to comply. This fear deterrent now creates a robust and powerful figure for the United States, in that no organization or terrorist has any desire to attack a country that will get all information needed, and one can either suffer or give away vital information of their associates ("Torture Is a Just Means of Preventing Terrorism)". This idea may seem completely immoral to some, however needs to be accepted. The idea of war is immensely immoral, however it is inevitable at different times throughout history.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the only way to save the citizen’s lives is to subject the terrorist to the most excruciating possible pain, how can we not do so? Is torturing the terrorist unconstitutional? Most likely. But millions of lives definitely outweigh constitutionality. Is torture a barbaric practice?…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For instance one might not give the correct information, or simply say something randomly in order to avoid more physical and mental pain. All in all Censorship of Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Prisons simply doe not work. This is because of the reasons of the abuse of prisoners is simply wrong, unlawful trials, and the fact that enhanced interrogation techniques do not always work. The people of the United States should be outraged that our government would ever consider censoring their actions. Torture is an unlawful and barbaric tactic that is not only simply wrong, but it is illegal.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture is generally ineffective, effects those subjected to it for the remainder of their lives, and is unacceptable no matter the reason. Consider the United Nations, what it is and what it stands for. The United Nations wrote and signed something known as the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions explicitly state in article 3 that, “humane treatment is required for all people in enemy hands. The use of murder, mutilation, torture, and the use of humiliating or degrading treatment is prohibited.”…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Water Torture

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The issue of whether or not torture is an effective and appropriate means of extracting information from subjects has been pondered for centuries. More so than ever before, the interrogation tactics used by the CIA after September 11, 2001 have been the subject of intense scrutiny. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on 9/11, the CIA ramped up its efforts to acquire human intelligence information deemed vital to United States national security. The compelling need to acquire information important to national security was not adequately balanced against the need to respect basic human rights. Further, the highly controversial interrogation methods employed on potential suspects linked to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays