Water Torture

Improved Essays
The issue of whether or not torture is an effective and appropriate means of extracting information from subjects has been pondered for centuries. More so than ever before, the interrogation tactics used by the CIA after September 11, 2001 have been the subject of intense scrutiny. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on 9/11, the CIA ramped up its efforts to acquire human intelligence information deemed vital to United States national security. The compelling need to acquire information important to national security was not adequately balanced against the need to respect basic human rights. Further, the highly controversial interrogation methods employed on potential suspects linked to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the …show more content…
Although this tactic dates back to the Spanish Inquisition, the form of waterboarding most widely used today involves choking the victim by filling his or her throat with a steady stream of water so as to simulate the experience of drowning. The use of waterboarding, known variously as "water torture," the "water cure", or “tormenta de toca,” was first documented in the 14th century, according to Ed Peters, a historian at the University of Pennsylvania (Weiner). Around 1800, as the Enlightenment swept across Europe, many countries banned the practice and people began to view waterboarding as "morally repugnant;" nevertheless, President Bush still authorized the use of this contemptible practice approximately 183 times on Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-professed mastermind of the September 11th attacks, and 83 times on Abu Zubaydah, another prominent al-Qaeda operative. Staunchly unremorseful, Bush went so far as to state that he would "do it again to save lives" while speaking to the Economic Club of Grand Rapids, Michigan (Associated Press). In 2010, the Prime Minister of Great Britain voiced opposition to George Bush's claim that waterboarding was a legitimate interrogation method after Bush had attempted to downplay the brutality of the technique and claimed that it had saved British lives (Siddique & McGreal). The British went further, confirming that they share in President Obama's position that waterboarding indeed constitutes torture (Siddique & McGreal). In addition, former Republican presidential nominee, Senator John McCain, who was subjected to torture techniques as a soldier in Vietnam, has long professed that waterboarding is a “horrible torture technique” and a “terrible and odious practice” that “should never be condoned in the United States” (USA Today). With the eyes of the world upon it, it is essential that the United States clearly differentiate its own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anne Applebaum states in “The Torture Myth”, that America has operated under the false pretense that torture is a viable option for obtaining information, and because terrorists are malicious, so America needs more aggression to win. She argues that torture hurts the country more than it benefits. Torture…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “ticking time bomb” scenario is arguably the most used justification for the use of torture. The problem with this scenario is that it is based solely on the discretion of the intelligence official. This policy addresses the idea of discretion as both the ability to make a decision and the ability to govern in terms of policymaking. Theodore J. Lowi in his article Legitimizing Public Administration: A Disturbed Dissent talks about where the constitutional ability to use discretion lies. He contends that discretion lies in the hands Congress first and foremost (Lowi, 1993, p. 263).…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government is known to do controversial actions when it comes to interrogation. The most controversial tactic is torture treatment. Torture treatment has always been around, but there have always been issues with it. The main issue is, is it constitutional? The eighth amendment states that no one is subject to cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Zimbardo Evaluation

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Abu Ghraib held one of the most notorious prisons whereby executions, torture and appalling living conditions existed. Abu Ghraib became a U.S. military prison for criminals after its original regime collapsed. To much concern, after America had taken over this prison and replaced all of its inmates, Major General Antonio M. Tuguba found that there were numerous cases of abuse at Abu Ghraib. These illegal instances of abuse were actioned by members of the American intelligence community (Hersh, 2004). This displays that the Americans level of authority over those in Abu Ghraib may have been due trying to conform to their role of power.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The producers of 24 utilize American paranoia to the show’s advantage and have subsequently changed the nation’s perception of the word interrogation, its meaning, use, and popularity. Ever since the tragedy of September 11 attacks, The American public has become aware that the United States is no longer invulnerable to terrorist attacks. Nowadays, people think that interrogation and torture are the same because 24 imposed on viewers the idea that torture is the most effective type of interrogation. According to the Human Rights First, less than four acts of torture appeared on prime-time television each year prior to the September 11 attacks. Since then, more than a hundred of torture scenes had aired annually.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, Report: CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques “brutal” and “ineffective” by Justin Scuiletti says that the enhanced interrogation techniques implemented by the CIA are not that effective with the detainees. The Attorney General John Ashcroft approved verbally the methods used as enhanced interrogation techniques on July 24, 2002. A report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee Tuesday announced the CIA’s use of several interrogation methods. In the report there were in total of ten interrogation techniques. After a few days, waterboarding was verbally approved.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the same time the opponents of these methods were convinced that one individual could not be an organizer of so many terrorist plots and revealed their skepticism in relation to his claims. They stated that taking into consideration the types of tortures, which could be applied to an individual, there is never a guarantee that his confessions are true to life and were not made purely with the aim to stop tortures and remain alive. This argument makes everybody doubt as for effectiveness of tortures. “For instance, a torture victim deprived of his clothes will feel so “ashamed and humiliated and cold,” said retired FBI counterterrorism agent Dan Coleman, “he 'll tell you anything you want to hear to get his clothing back. There 's no value in it.”…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “A Case for Torture,” Michael Levin makes the erroneous claim that torture is permissible because he does not address the countless legal issues connected to the controversy. Instead of choosing to include verifiable facts that disprove the legitimacy of torture, Levin manipulates his readers’ emotions through the use of pathos, the fabrication of improbable tragedies, and unsourced studies. Levin’s “A Case for Torture” is purposely flawed in hopes of convincing his audience to join him in advocating for…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Strained positions for long hours, sleep deprivation and waterboarding, with the occasional punch or slap, may sound worth it in order to save thousands of innocent Americans lives from the ongoing war of terror. It is a known fact that the American government used the term “enhanced interrogation” loosely in order to cover up their questionable actions to get any little piece of information about any terrorist motives with torture. Enhanced interrogation has been described as systematic torture in order to obtain potential terrorist information. Even though the CIA get their information, the process behind on how they got it always remains confidential only for the government. Because of the confidentiality this causes a problem to the public and foreign relations.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emergency Powers Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Standard interrogation procedures failed to produce what the Administration deemed to be “actionable intelligence;” consequently, the Administration ordered detainees being held in Guantanamo, the Abu Ghraib prison, and the Bagram Air Force Base be forced to endure degrading tactics, such as waterboarding and sleep deprivation, to coerce confessions and produce information. The 2002 Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum, which defined “torture” very narrowly, was specifically cited by the Bush administration as the legal justification for their actions. (Justice Department Memos on Interrogation Techniques, 35). Although the Bush administration denied that Congress could institute limitations regarding the president’s torture policy, arguing in OLC memos that Congress cannot inhibit presidential actions as Commander in Chief, Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, states that the “Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces,” are to be made by…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ever since the 9/11 attacks the United States government has been very cautious on anything relating to homeland security. Since the 9/11 attacks Washington Post conducted a nation wide survey that states, majority of Americans believe that its okay to use harsh interrogation techniques on suspects considered to be terrorist. The margin of Americans who believe this is nearly two to one, fifty-nine percent believe that it's okay to torture while as the thirty-one percent believe that it is never okay to do so. However the arguments that proponents for torture have are very understandable. One arguement proponents for toruture would say is for you to imagine if a bomb has been planted in the heart of a nearby city, the police have made everyone aware of who the culprit is and provided profound evidence against the man…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Responsibility for prisoner abuse in Iraq continues to bring down the military. Maintaining Presidential Deniability is a big thing. The CIA offers to take the blame on things. President Bush proclaimed that he would never condone torture because “the values of this country are such that torture is not part of our soul and our being.” Sixty-three percent say that torture is not acceptable, while the other 37 percent say yes.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There should be a fine line between allowing torture and not allowing torture. There should not be any gray area where a civilian who has not committed the crime can be…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays