All-white jury

The Secret Power of Jury Nullification Response In the Podcast “The Life of the Law, Episode 1, The Secret Power of Jury Nullification”, Shannon Heffernan explains the often overlook power of jury nullification in the U.S. court system. She defines nullification as, when a jury is convinced that a defendant is guilty but find the defendant innocent anyway. Heffernan provides examples of cases throughout history that aid the idea that nullification among juries can potentially benefit…

whole audience of the court stating they would be cowards if they didn’t convict him. The outburst is clearly a last resort method from emotional distress, all leading to the assumption of false testimony. In clear contrast, Tom is called upon in his defense and described the scenario with extreme detail, even recalling exact verbal exchange, all with great fluency. Today, simply because of his body language and fluency in his recollection, most would conclude his innocence. When Mayella’s…

Arguments and evidence presented by the prosecution as well as both the council for Ponder and the council for Yilma allowed for the majority of the truth of the case to be put before the jury, and resulted in justice in Ponder’s case, but not in Yilma’s. The prosecution team’s preparation of evidence allowed for the truth regarding the murder charge to come out, however, we did not present enough to convict either defendant of robbery because of the lack of physical evidence that would suggest…

|No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random…

The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose should be read in schools. The play takes place during the 1950s, and is about a jury comprised of white males. In the trial, the defendant, a teenage boy, is on trial for murdering his father after he claims his father abused him. Like everyone, all the jurors have some prejudices about the defendant and opinions of the case before they begin to deliberate. While these twelve men try to reach a unanimous decision, some jurors are unwilling to change…

alongside the scholarly sources I have decided that both crime control and due process methods were present at the time of my observations. Court Details I observed at court three separate cases, kidnapping, police brutality and property damage/arson. All…

achieving justice was deterred as occupational status and race contaminated and fostered impartiality amongst the jury, the witnesses and the provided evidence; three of the fundamental components of a judicial proceedings. Firstly, the jurors of a trial are of…

States and across the world. People were glued to their televisions as the trial carried on. The verdict of the O.J. Simpson trial was wronged by many factors. Starting with the race of the suspect, to the selection of the jury, concluding with the prosecution’s failure to collect all of the substantial information and evidence to prove the guilty verdict of O.J. Simpson. This country has never seen something quite like the O.J. Simpson trial. An American football legend put on trial for a…

Trial by Jury What is a Jury? – A jury can be simply defined as a body of people that are sworn to give a verdict on a particular matter that is submitted to them. Also a jury is a group of people that attends in judgement not only upon the accused but also upon the justice and humanity of the law. Role of a jury – The jury fulfils a very important function in the legal system. The jury decides the facts of a case and their directions. You are entitled to be tried by the jury unless the alleged…

Trial of Tom Robinson Lucia Selaelo 201570291 Introduction The trial of Tom Robinson takes place around the 1930s, a time in America where racism was rife and in the South, where the rights and interests of whites were favoured to those of the blacks. It was the time and era where the whites strongly believed that they were better than people of colour and due to this premise, it was more likely that people of colour would be convicted, most probably unfairly and endure arbitrary arrests and…