Jury Nullification In The Podcast: The Life Of The Law

Improved Essays
The Secret Power of Jury Nullification Response In the Podcast “The Life of the Law, Episode 1, The Secret Power of Jury Nullification”, Shannon Heffernan explains the often overlook power of jury nullification in the U.S. court system. She defines nullification as, when a jury is convinced that a defendant is guilty but find the defendant innocent anyway. Heffernan provides examples of cases throughout history that aid the idea that nullification among juries can potentially benefit courtroom justice. She also weights its negative effects that cause potentially major injustices in courtrooms. Jury nullification is a positive aspect of courtroom justice, providing jury members with a voice in their community.
Historically jury nullification has protected Americans from unjust law and oversight. During the revolution nullification was able to protect Americans from British rule. It also aided in the abolition of slavery by protecting slaves from unjust laws that denied their rights. These are perfect examples of how juries are provided the power to
…show more content…
courts. She also provides multiple examples through history, such as the U.S. revolution and prohibition, where jury nullification has had a large impact on shaping our nation. Insight provided by courtroom professionals benefits both the negative and positive effects of nullification. Diamond’s study puts the issue of nullification into perspective when she explains how rare nullification actually occurs and places trust in our juries because they contain the values that represent our society. Heffernan’s argument for the positive effects of jury nullification seems to outweigh the negative effects. Most examples jury nullification provided seem to be in cases of little significance, like the minor drug charges described by Paul Butler. Overall her podcast provides good arguments and insights for the positives and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jacobson arguing that the court had abused its discretionary powers when it did not allow Jacobson’s attorney’s to poll the jury, and instead assumed that the jurors had abided by the restrictions placed on them to avoid news reports. The due process clause guarantees everyone the right to a trial by an impartial jury, and this was denied to Sandra L. Jacobson when public broadcasting was clearly impartial towards the prosecution, and the jurors had the means to watch said report, which would render them biased. Legally, if there is the possibility that jurors may have been exposed to material that is prejudicial, then an appellate court should be able to gauge the exposure and determine the prejudice of the jury. The trial court was able to determine that unfair prejudice from this broadcasting station, including information that would be inadmissible in trial and would therefore contaminate the jury. Several cases have shown that warnings alone do not neutralize the potential for jury contamination, so a trial court should not rely solely on the warnings it gives jurors.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Professor of Law at George Mason University wrote an article about the jury nullification in the Washington Post. In it he focuses of various aspects that make this process so interesting and contradicting. The author give his personal view on jury nullification and his initial attitude toward it. Jury nullification can be seen as a two edged sword, because it is not applied on constant and consistent basis. The author, Ilya Somin agrees that it can curb unjust laws, however it can backfire.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juries are a key component of the justice system and they exist as the ultimate deciding factor in terms of defining the defendant as guilty or not guilty. In order to be on a jury and occupy one of the twelve spots, a jury consultant digs through the potential juror’s social media networks. Jury Consultants accumulate information about the jurors and check to see if the information they find is “favorable” or “unfavorable”. Jury Consultants have a job of Jury Profiling, which is the implementation of social science to help lawyers understand the underlying factors that jurors possess.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jury nullification is a way of people showing what they think about a law: The ultimate purpose of any true justice system is to help society by removing and punishing people that are dangerous to it. Specifically, all democratic regimes are based on the idea of people possessing the power, believing that leaving the government to society itself is the best way to go about making decisions because the people are competent and are the best at knowing what is good for them. Keeping jury nullification allows the people to show what they think about a law. For example, if many marijuana cases were nullified this would be a clear indication that the people don"t think these laws are good for society, the laws need to be altered, or the sentences are unreasonable. Consider this, laws are made for the good of society so if society feels like a law is not beneficial the law's purpose is undermined.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Clemence Boboy Professor Hollinger Course 1301 26 October 2017 Theory of “Nullification” “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”, quoted by James Madison. Nullification theory is a belief that a state has the right to invalidate any federal law that was considered unconstitutional. The Constitution Convention continuously rejects to support this theory. They declared that only the federal courts had the right to void a law.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury nullification is the point at which the jury knowing and intentionally rejects the proof or refusal to apply the law wither in light of the fact that the jury needs to communicate something specific about some social issue that is bigger than the case itself, or on the grounds that the outcome directed by law is in opposition to the jury feeling of justice, morality, or fairness. In addition, an optional demonstration is not a legitimate sanction capacity of the jury. It is the thought to be conflicting with the jury obligation to restore a decision construct exclusively in light of the law and the certainties of the case. The jury does not have a privilege to defense, and the direction is not allowed to exhibit the possibility of invalidation…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution affords defendants the right to a trial by an impartial jury through the Sixth Amendment (Hall, 2015). The selection of the jury is a precursor stage for all jury trials, in this stage, the counsel for the defense as well as the counsel for the prosecution have the right to request the dismissal of a potential juror commonly referred to as voir dire. In the instance where there is a specific reason, a potential juror is to be dismissed it is called a challenge for cause. Conversely, in the instance where a there is no supported reason an attorney may use what is called a peremptory challenge to dismiss a potential juror. The main difference in the two challenges is the reasoning.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sources 1.Constitution. Org. (1994, January 1). History of Jury Nullification. Retrieved from Constitution: http://www.constitution.org/jury/pj/fija_history.htm 2.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Illusory Causation in the Courtroom, published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, G. Daniel Lassiter explores illusory causation in terms of the role it plays in courtrooms. This is the possibility of the effect that camera perspective has on jurors’ judgements on the suspect’s guilt, whether it was a voluntary confession and sentence recommendations. The Death Penalty Information Center had documented cases in which death row inmates were released due to new evidence and in many cases, the cause of wrongful convictions can be traced back to the interrogation phase in which false confessions are extracted. Many experts believe that the solution to suspects being coerced into wrongful confessions are videotaping confessions.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of jury nullification has long incited debate, with strong opinions on both sides. Paul Butler a former Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, claims jury nullification is necessary in order to fight laws that are racially unjust and argues that African-American jurors should exercise their right of nullification and it is their moral responsibility to emancipate some guilty black outlaws (Butler, 1995, p. 679). Jury nullification, occurs when jurors deliberately vote to acquit a defendant, regardless of evidence presented to establish the defendant’s guilt (Spohn, 2009, p. 68). It is a mechanism employed by prosecutors to encourage jurors to disregard the law and evidence and acquit defendants (Horowitz,…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    IV. For Nullification Based on the tacit allowance of jury nullification that is present today, and the stated allowance of it in death penalty cases, jury nullification should be brought out of the darkness and instated as a right in trials. The benefits of jury nullification are clear, and include the fact that juries can respond to unanticipated circumstances in the moment that laws cannot and that they can look at exigent circumstances and choose to grant a defendant freedom when those circumstances are clear. There are three main ways that nullification should be made known and legal.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jon B. Gould, J.D., Ph.D., a professor and the director of the Washington Institute for Public and International Affairs Research at American University and his team of researchers conducted a three year, first of its kind, large-scale empirical study Predicting Erroneous Convictions: A Social Science Approach to Miscarriages of Justice employing social scientific methods. It was funded by NIJ, and an NIJ video features Gould discussing wrongful convictions. After identifying 460 cases employing sophisticated analytical methods matched with a qualitative review of the cases from a panel of experts, 10 statistically significant factors were identified that distinguish a wrongful conviction from a “near miss” (a case in which an innocent defendant was acquitted or had charges dismissed before trial) NIJ…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This spurs others to at least reconsider their verdict. Afterward, votes are changed as well as perspectives and lives. Votes are cast again and again, each time there are more not guilty verdicts. As the jurors continue to battle among themselves, minds are…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays